Fourier Transforms of Lorentz Invariant Functions

Fourier transforms of Lorentz invariant functions in Minkowski space, with support on both the timelike and the spacelike domains are performed by means of direct integration. The cases of 1+1 and 1+2 dimensions are worked out in detail, and the results for 1+n dimensions are given.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figur

Weighted frames of exponentials and stable recovery of multidimensional functions from nonuniform Fourier samples

In this paper, we consider the problem of recovering a compactly supported multivariate function from a collection of pointwise samples of its Fourier transform taken nonuniformly. We do this by using the concept of weighted Fourier frames. A seminal result of Beurling shows that sample points give rise to a classical Fourier frame provided they are relatively separated and of sufficient density. However, this result does not allow for arbitrary clustering of sample points, as is often the case in practice. Whilst keeping the density condition sharp and dimension independent, our first result removes the separation condition and shows that density alone suffices. However, this result does not lead to estimates for the frame bounds. A known result of Groechenig provides explicit estimates, but only subject to a density condition that deteriorates linearly with dimension. In our second result we improve these bounds by reducing the dimension dependence. In particular, we provide explicit frame bounds which are dimensionless for functions having compact support contained in a sphere. Next, we demonstrate how our two main results give new insight into a reconstruction algorithm---based on the existing generalized sampling framework---that allows for stable and quasi-optimal reconstruction in any particular basis from a finite collection of samples. Finally, we construct sufficiently dense sampling schemes that are often used in practice---jittered, radial and spiral sampling schemes---and provide several examples illustrating the effectiveness of our approach when tested on these schemes

Incremental Distance Transforms (IDT)

A new generic scheme for incremental implementations of distance transforms (DT) is presented: Incremental Distance Transforms (IDT). This scheme is applied on the cityblock, Chamfer, and three recent exact Euclidean DT (E2DT). A benchmark shows that for all five DT, the incremental implementation results in a significant speedup: 3.4×−10×. However, significant differences (i.e., up to 12.5×) among the DT remain present. The FEED transform, one of the recent E2DT, even showed to be faster than both city-block and Chamfer DT. So, through a very efficient incremental processing scheme for DT, a relief is found for E2DT’s computational burden

Maximum Scatter TSP in Doubling Metrics

We study the problem of finding a tour of $n$ points in which every edge is long. More precisely, we wish to find a tour that visits every point exactly once, maximizing the length of the shortest edge in the tour. The problem is known as Maximum Scatter TSP, and was introduced by Arkin et al. (SODA 1997), motivated by applications in manufacturing and medical imaging. Arkin et al. gave a $0.5$-approximation for the metric version of the problem and showed that this is the best possible ratio achievable in polynomial time (assuming $P \neq NP$). Arkin et al. raised the question of whether a better approximation ratio can be obtained in the Euclidean plane. We answer this question in the affirmative in a more general setting, by giving a $(1-\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for $d$-dimensional doubling metrics, with running time $\tilde{O}\big(n^3 + 2^{O(K \log K)}\big)$, where $K \leq \left( \frac{13}{\epsilon} \right)^d$. As a corollary we obtain (i) an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) for all constant dimensions $d$, (ii) a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for dimension $d = \log\log{n}/c$, for a sufficiently large constant $c$, and (iii) a PTAS for constant $d$ and $\epsilon = \Omega(1/\log\log{n})$. Furthermore, we show the dependence on $d$ in our approximation scheme to be essentially optimal, unless Satisfiability can be solved in subexponential time