Mode-Based versus Activity-Based Search for a Nonredundant Resolution of the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem

[EN] This paper addresses an energy-based extension of the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (MRCPSP) called MRCPSP-ENERGY. This extension considers the energy consumption as an additional resource that leads to different execution modes (and durations) of the activities. Consequently, different schedules can be obtained. The objective is to maximize the efficiency of the project, which takes into account the minimization of both makespan and energy consumption. This is a well-known NP-hard problem, such that the application of metaheuristic techniques is necessary to address real-size problems in a reasonable time. This paper shows that the Activity List representation, commonly used in metaheuristics, can lead to obtaining many redundant solutions, that is, solutions that have different representations but are in fact the same. This is a serious disadvantage for a search procedure. We propose a genetic algorithm(GA) for solving the MRCPSP-ENERGY, trying to avoid redundant solutions by focusing the search on the execution modes, by using the Mode List representation. The proposed GA is evaluated on different instances of the PSPLIB-ENERGY library and compared to the results obtained by both exact methods and approximate methods reported in the literature. This library is an extension of the well-known PSPLIB library, which contains MRCPSP-ENERGY test cases.This paper has been partially supported by the Spanish Research Projects TIN2013-46511-C2-1-P and TIN2016-80856-R.Morillo-Torres, D.; Barber, F.; Salido, MA. (2017). Mode-Based versus Activity-Based Search for a Nonredundant Resolution of the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2017:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4627856S1152017Mouzon, G., Yildirim, M. B., & Twomey, J. (2007). Operational methods for minimization of energy consumption of manufacturing equipment. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4247-4271. doi:10.1080/00207540701450013Hartmann, S., & Sprecher, A. (1996). A note on «hierarchical models for multi-project planning and scheduling». European Journal of Operational Research, 94(2), 377-383. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00158-1Christofides, N., Alvarez-Valdes, R., & Tamarit, J. M. (1987). Project scheduling with resource constraints: A branch and bound approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 29(3), 262-273. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(87)90240-2Zhu, G., Bard, J. F., & Yu, G. (2006). A Branch-and-Cut Procedure for the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project-Scheduling Problem. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 18(3), 377-390. doi:10.1287/ijoc.1040.0121Kolisch, R., & Hartmann, S. (1999). Heuristic Algorithms for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem: Classification and Computational Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 147-178. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5533-9_7Józefowska, J., Mika, M., Różycki, R., Waligóra, G., & Węglarz, J. (2001). Annals of Operations Research, 102(1/4), 137-155. doi:10.1023/a:1010954031930Bouleimen, K., & Lecocq, H. (2003). A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version. European Journal of Operational Research, 149(2), 268-281. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00761-0Alcaraz, J., Maroto, C., & Ruiz, R. (2003). Solving the Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with genetic algorithms. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 614-626. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601563Zhang, H., Tam, C. M., & Li, H. (2006). Multimode Project Scheduling Based on Particle Swarm Optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 21(2), 93-103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00420.xJarboui, B., Damak, N., Siarry, P., & Rebai, A. (2008). A combinatorial particle swarm optimization for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195(1), 299-308. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2007.04.096Li, H., & Zhang, H. (2013). Ant colony optimization-based multi-mode scheduling under renewable and nonrenewable resource constraints. Automation in Construction, 35, 431-438. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.030Lova, A., Tormos, P., Cervantes, M., & Barber, F. (2009). An efficient hybrid genetic algorithm for scheduling projects with resource constraints and multiple execution modes. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(2), 302-316. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.11.002Peteghem, V. V., & Vanhoucke, M. (2010). A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 409-418. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.034Węglarz, J., Józefowska, J., Mika, M., & Waligóra, G. (2011). Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes – A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 208(3), 177-205. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.037Kolisch, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 23-37. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.065Debels, D., De Reyck, B., Leus, R., & Vanhoucke, M. (2006). A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(2), 638-653. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.020Paraskevopoulos, D. C., Tarantilis, C. D., & Ioannou, G. (2012). Solving project scheduling problems with resource constraints via an event list-based evolutionary algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(4), 3983-3994. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.062Drexl, A. (1991). Scheduling of Project Networks by Job Assignment. Management Science, 37(12), 1590-1602. doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.12.1590BOCTOR, F. F. (1996). Resource-constrained project scheduling by simulated annealing. International Journal of Production Research, 34(8), 2335-2351. doi:10.1080/0020754960890502

Project schedule optimisation utilising genetic algorithms

This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University.This thesis extends the body of research into the application of Genetic Algorithms to the Project Scheduling Problem (PSP). A thorough literature review is conducted in this area as well as in the application of other similar meta-heuristics. The review extends previous similar reviews to include PSP utilizing the Design Structure Matrix (DSM), as well as incorporating recent developments. There is a need within industry for optimisation algorithms that can assist in the identification of optimal schedules when presented with a network that can present a number of possible alternatives. The optimisation requirement may be subtle only performing slight resource levelling or more profound by selecting an optimal mode of execution for a number of activities or evaluating a number of alternative strategies. This research proposes a unique, efficient algorithm using adaptation based on the fitness improvement over successive generations. The algorithm is tested initially using a MATLAB based implementation to solve instances of the travelling salesman problem (TSP). The algorithm is then further developed both within MATLAB and Microsoft Project Visual Basic to optimise both known versions of the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problems as well as investigating newly defined variants of the problem class

The Response Time Variability Problem: a review

Preprin

Exact and non-exact procedures for solving the response time variability problem (RTVP)

Premi extraordinari doctorat curs 2009-2010, àmbit d’Enginyeria IndustrialCuando se ha de compartir un recurso entre demandas (de productos, clientes, tareas, etc.) competitivas que requieren una atención regular, es importante programar el derecho al acceso del recurso de alguna forma justa de manera que cada producto, cliente o tarea reciba un acceso al recurso proporcional a su demanda relativa al total de las demandas competitivas. Este tipo de problemas de secuenciación pueden ser generalizados bajo el siguiente esquema. Dados n símbolos, cada uno con demanda di (i = 1,...,n), se ha de generar una secuencia justa o regular donde cada símbolo aparezca di veces. No existe una definición universal de justicia, ya que puede haber varias métricas razonables para medirla según el problema específico considerado. En el Problema de Variabilidad en el Tiempo de Respuesta, o Response Time Variability Problem (RTVP) en inglés, la injusticia o irregularidad de una secuencia es medida como la suma, para todos los símbolos, de sus variabilidades en las distancias en que las copias de cada símbolo son secuenciados. Así, el objetivo del RTVP es encontrar la secuencia que minimice la variabilidad total. En otras palabras, el objetivo del RTVP es minimizar la variabilidad de los instantes en que los productos, clientes o trabajos reciben el recurso necesario. Este problema aparece en una amplia variedad de situaciones de la vida real; entre otras, secuenciación en líneas de modelo-mixto bajo just-in-time (JIT), en asignación de recursos en sistemas computacionales multi-hilo como sistemas operativos, servidores de red y aplicaciones mutimedia, en el mantenimiento periódico de maquinaria, en la recolección de basura, en la programación de comerciales en televisión y en el diseño de rutas para agentes comerciales con múltiples visitas a un mismo cliente. En algunos de estos problemas la regularidad no es una propiedad deseable por sí misma, si no que ayuda a minimizar costes. De hecho, cuando los costes son proporcionales al cuadrado de las distancias, el problema de minimizar costes y el RTVP son equivalentes. El RTVP es muy difícil de resolver (se ha demostrado que es NP-hard). El tamaño de las instancias del RTVP que pueden ser resueltas óptimamente con el mejor método exacto existente en la literatura tiene un límite práctico de 40 unidades. Por otro lado, los métodos no exactos propuestos en la literatura para resolver instancias mayores consisten en heurísticos simples que obtienen soluciones rápidamente, pero cuya calidad puede ser mejorada. Por tanto, los métodos de resolución existentes en la literatura son insuficientes. El principal objetivo de esta tesis es mejorar la resolución del RTVP. Este objetivo se divide en los dos siguientes subobjetivos : 1) aumentar el tamaño de las instancias del RTVP que puedan ser resueltas de forma óptima en un tiempo de computación práctico, y 2) obtener de forma eficiente soluciones lo más cercanas a las óptimas para instancias mayores. Además, la tesis tiene los dos siguientes objetivos secundarios: a) investigar el uso de metaheurísticos bajo el esquema de los hiper-heurísticos, y b) diseñar un procedimiento sistemático y automático para fijar los valores adecuados a los parámetros de los algoritmos. Se han desarrollado diversos métodos para alcanzar los objetivos anteriormente descritos. Para la resolución del RTVP se ha diseñado un método exacto basado en la técnica branch and bound y el tamaño de las instancias que pueden resolverse en un tiempo práctico se ha incrementado a 55 unidades. Para instancias mayores, se han diseñado métodos heurísticos, metaheurísticos e hiper-heurísticos, los cuales pueden obtener soluciones óptimas o casi óptimas rápidamente. Además, se ha propuesto un procedimiento sistemático y automático para tunear parámetros que aprovecha las ventajas de dos procedimientos existentes (el algoritmo Nelder & Mead y CALIBRA).When a resource must be shared between competing demands (of products, clients, jobs, etc.) that require regular attention, it is important to schedule the access right to the resource in some fair manner so that each product, client or job receives a share of the resource that is proportional to its demand relative to the total of the competing demands. These types of sequencing problems can be generalized under the following scheme. Given n symbols, each one with demand di (i = 1,...,n), a fair or regular sequence must be built in which each symbol appears di times. There is not a universal definition of fairness, as several reasonable metrics to measure it can be defined according to the specific considered problem. In the Response Time Variability Problem (RTVP), the unfairness or the irregularity of a sequence is measured by the sum, for all symbols, of their variabilities in the positions at which the copies of each symbol are sequenced. Thus, the objective of the RTVP is to find the sequence that minimises the total variability. In other words, the RTVP objective is to minimise the variability in the instants at which products, clients or jobs receive the necessary resource. This problem appears in a broad range of real-world areas. Applications include sequencing of mixed-model assembly lines under just-in-time (JIT), resource allocation in computer multi-threaded systems such as operating systems, network servers and media-based applications, periodic machine maintenance, waste collection, scheduling commercial videotapes for television and designing of salespeople's routes with multiple visits, among others. In some of these problems the regularity is not a property desirable by itself, but it helps to minimise costs. In fact, when the costs are proportional to the square of the distances, the problem of minimising costs and the RTVP are equivalent. The RTVP is very hard to be solved (it has been demonstrated that it is NP-hard). The size of the RTVP instances that can be solved optimally with the best exact method existing in the literature has a practical limit of 40 units. On the other hand, the non-exact methods proposed in the literature to solve larger instances are simple heuristics that obtains solutions quickly, but the quality of the obtained solutions can be improved. Thus, the solution methods existing in the literature are not enough to solve the RTVP. The main objective of this thesis is to improve the resolution of the RTVP. This objective is split in the two following sub-objectives: 1) to increase the size of the RTVP instances that can be solved optimally in a practical computing time; and 2) to obtain efficiently near-optimal solutions for larger instances. Moreover, the thesis has the following two secondary objectives: a) to research the use of metaheuristics under the scheme of hyper-heuristics, and b) to design a systematic, hands-off procedure to set the suitable values of the algorithm parameters. To achieve the aforementioned objectives, several procedures have been developed. To solve the RTVP an exact procedure based on the branch and bound technique has been designed and the size of the instances that can be solved in a practical time has been increased to 55 units. For larger instances, heuristic, heuristic, metaheuristic and hyper-heuristic procedures have been designed, which can obtain optimal or near-optimal solutions quickly. Moreover, a systematic, hands-off fine-tuning method that takes advantage of the two existing ones (Nelder & Mead algorithm and CALIBRA) has been proposed.Award-winningPostprint (published version