2,020 research outputs found
Treebank-based acquisition of a Chinese lexical-functional grammar
Scaling wide-coverage, constraint-based grammars such as Lexical-Functional Grammars (LFG) (Kaplan and Bresnan, 1982; Bresnan, 2001) or Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammars (HPSG) (Pollard and Sag, 1994) from fragments to naturally occurring unrestricted text is knowledge-intensive, time-consuming and (often prohibitively) expensive. A number of researchers have recently presented methods to automatically acquire wide-coverage, probabilistic constraint-based grammatical resources from treebanks (Cahill et al., 2002, Cahill et al., 2003; Cahill et al., 2004; Miyao et al., 2003; Miyao et al., 2004; Hockenmaier and Steedman, 2002; Hockenmaier, 2003), addressing the knowledge acquisition bottleneck in constraint-based grammar development. Research to date has concentrated on English and German. In this paper we report on an experiment to induce wide-coverage, probabilistic LFG grammatical and lexical resources for Chinese from the Penn Chinese Treebank (CTB) (Xue et al., 2002) based on an automatic f-structure annotation algorithm. Currently 96.751% of the CTB trees receive a single, covering and connected f-structure, 0.112% do not receive an f-structure due to feature clashes, while 3.137% are associated with multiple f-structure fragments. From the f-structure-annotated CTB we extract a total of 12975 lexical entries with 20 distinct subcategorisation frame types. Of these 3436 are verbal entries with a total of 11 different frame types. We extract a number of PCFG-based LFG approximations. Currently our best automatically induced grammars achieve an f-score of 81.57% against the trees in unseen articles 301-325; 86.06% f-score (all grammatical functions) and 73.98% (preds-only) against the dependencies derived from the f-structures automatically generated for the original trees in 301-325 and 82.79% (all grammatical functions) and 67.74% (preds-only) against the dependencies derived from the manually annotated gold-standard f-structures for 50 trees randomly selected from articles 301-325
GF-DOP: grammatical feature data-oriented parsing
This paper proposes an extension of Tree-DOP which approximates the LFG-DOP model. GF-DOP combines the robustness of the DOP model with some of the linguistic competence of LFG. LFG c-structure trees are augmented with LFG functional information, with the aim of (i) generating
more informative parses than Tree-DOP; (ii) improving overall parse ranking by modelling grammatical features; and (iii) avoiding the inconsistent probability models of LFG-DOP. In a number of experiments on the HomeCentre corpus, we report on which (groups of) features most heavily influence parse quality, both positively and negatively
Improved Relation Extraction with Feature-Rich Compositional Embedding Models
Compositional embedding models build a representation (or embedding) for a
linguistic structure based on its component word embeddings. We propose a
Feature-rich Compositional Embedding Model (FCM) for relation extraction that
is expressive, generalizes to new domains, and is easy-to-implement. The key
idea is to combine both (unlexicalized) hand-crafted features with learned word
embeddings. The model is able to directly tackle the difficulties met by
traditional compositional embeddings models, such as handling arbitrary types
of sentence annotations and utilizing global information for composition. We
test the proposed model on two relation extraction tasks, and demonstrate that
our model outperforms both previous compositional models and traditional
feature rich models on the ACE 2005 relation extraction task, and the SemEval
2010 relation classification task. The combination of our model and a
log-linear classifier with hand-crafted features gives state-of-the-art
results.Comment: 12 pages for EMNLP 201
Recommended from our members
Leveraging a semantically annotated corpus to disambiguate prepositional phrase attachment
Accurate parse ranking requires semantic information, since a sentence may have many candidate parses involving common syntactic constructions. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic frame- work for incorporating distributional semantic information into a maximum entropy parser. Further- more, to better deal with sparse data, we use a modified version of Latent Dirichlet Allocation to smooth the probability estimates. This LDA model generates pairs of lemmas, representing the two arguments of a semantic relation, and can be trained, in an unsupervised manner, on a corpus anno- tated with semantic dependencies. To evaluate our framework in isolation from the rest of a parser, we consider the special case of prepositional phrase attachment ambiguity. The results show that our semantically-motivated feature is effective in this case, and moreover, the LDA smoothing both produces semantically interpretable topics, and also improves performance over raw co-occurrence frequencies, demonstrating that it can successfully generalise patterns in the training data.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Association for Computational Linguistics via http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W15-0101
Parallel Distributed Grammar Engineering for Practical Applications
Based on a detailed case study of parallel grammar development distributed across two sites, we review some of the requirements for regression testing in grammar engineering, summarize our approach to systematic competence and performance profiling, and discuss our experience with grammar development for a commercial application. If possible, the workshop presentation will be organized around a software demonstration
Wide-coverage deep statistical parsing using automatic dependency structure annotation
A number of researchers (Lin 1995; Carroll, Briscoe, and Sanfilippo 1998; Carroll et al. 2002; Clark and Hockenmaier 2002; King et al. 2003; Preiss 2003; Kaplan et al. 2004;Miyao and Tsujii 2004) have convincingly argued for the use of dependency (rather than CFG-tree) representations
for parser evaluation. Preiss (2003) and Kaplan et al. (2004) conducted a number of experiments comparing ādeepā hand-crafted wide-coverage with āshallowā treebank- and machine-learning based parsers at the level of dependencies, using simple and automatic methods to convert tree output generated by the shallow parsers into dependencies. In this article, we revisit the experiments
in Preiss (2003) and Kaplan et al. (2004), this time using the sophisticated automatic LFG f-structure annotation methodologies of Cahill et al. (2002b, 2004) and Burke (2006), with surprising results. We compare various PCFG and history-based parsers (based on Collins, 1999; Charniak, 2000; Bikel, 2002) to find a baseline parsing system that fits best into our automatic dependency structure annotation technique. This combined system of syntactic parser and dependency structure annotation is compared to two hand-crafted, deep constraint-based parsers (Carroll and Briscoe 2002; Riezler et al. 2002). We evaluate using dependency-based gold standards (DCU 105, PARC 700, CBS 500 and dependencies for WSJ Section 22) and use the Approximate Randomization Test (Noreen 1989) to test the statistical significance of the results. Our experiments show that machine-learning-based shallow grammars augmented with sophisticated automatic dependency annotation technology outperform hand-crafted, deep, widecoverage constraint grammars. Currently our best system achieves an f-score of 82.73% against the PARC 700 Dependency Bank (King et al. 2003), a statistically significant improvement of 2.18%over the most recent results of 80.55%for the hand-crafted LFG grammar and XLE parsing system of Riezler et al. (2002), and an f-score of 80.23% against the CBS 500 Dependency Bank (Carroll, Briscoe, and Sanfilippo 1998), a statistically significant 3.66% improvement over the 76.57% achieved by the hand-crafted RASP grammar and parsing system of Carroll and
Briscoe (2002)
Dublin City University at QA@CLEF 2008
We describe our participation in Multilingual Question Answering at CLEF 2008 using German and English as our source and target languages respectively. The system was built using UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) as underlying framework
Neural Architecture for Question Answering Using a Knowledge Graph and Web Corpus
In Web search, entity-seeking queries often trigger a special Question
Answering (QA) system. It may use a parser to interpret the question to a
structured query, execute that on a knowledge graph (KG), and return direct
entity responses. QA systems based on precise parsing tend to be brittle: minor
syntax variations may dramatically change the response. Moreover, KG coverage
is patchy. At the other extreme, a large corpus may provide broader coverage,
but in an unstructured, unreliable form. We present AQQUCN, a QA system that
gracefully combines KG and corpus evidence. AQQUCN accepts a broad spectrum of
query syntax, between well-formed questions to short `telegraphic' keyword
sequences. In the face of inherent query ambiguities, AQQUCN aggregates signals
from KGs and large corpora to directly rank KG entities, rather than commit to
one semantic interpretation of the query. AQQUCN models the ideal
interpretation as an unobservable or latent variable. Interpretations and
candidate entity responses are scored as pairs, by combining signals from
multiple convolutional networks that operate collectively on the query, KG and
corpus. On four public query workloads, amounting to over 8,000 queries with
diverse query syntax, we see 5--16% absolute improvement in mean average
precision (MAP), compared to the entity ranking performance of recent systems.
Our system is also competitive at entity set retrieval, almost doubling F1
scores for challenging short queries.Comment: Accepted to Information Retrieval Journa
- ā¦