949 research outputs found

    Towards computable analysis on the generalised real line

    Full text link
    In this paper we use infinitary Turing machines with tapes of length Îș\kappa and which run for time Îș\kappa as presented, e.g., by Koepke \& Seyfferth, to generalise the notion of type two computability to 2Îș2^{\kappa}, where Îș\kappa is an uncountable cardinal with Îș<Îș=Îș\kappa^{<\kappa}=\kappa. Then we start the study of the computational properties of RÎș\mathbb{R}_\kappa, a real closed field extension of R\mathbb{R} of cardinality 2Îș2^{\kappa}, defined by the first author using surreal numbers and proposed as the candidate for generalising real analysis. In particular we introduce representations of RÎș\mathbb{R}_\kappa under which the field operations are computable. Finally we show that this framework is suitable for generalising the classical Weihrauch hierarchy. In particular we start the study of the computational strength of the generalised version of the Intermediate Value Theorem

    Explaining the unobserved: why quantum mechanics is not only about information

    Get PDF
    A remarkable theorem by Clifton, Bub and Halvorson (2003)(CBH) characterizes quantum theory in terms of information--theoretic principles. According to Bub (2004, 2005) the philosophical significance of the theorem is that quantum theory should be regarded as a ``principle'' theory about (quantum) information rather than a ``constructive'' theory about the dynamics of quantum systems. Here we criticize Bub's principle approach arguing that if the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics remains intact then there is no escape route from solving the measurement problem by constructive theories. We further propose a (Wigner--type) thought experiment that we argue demonstrates that quantum mechanics on the information--theoretic approach is incomplete.Comment: 34 Page

    Explaining the Unobserved: Why Quantum Theory Ain't Only About Information

    Get PDF
    A remarkable theorem by Clifton, Bub and Halvorson (2003) (CBH) characterizes quantum theory in terms of information--theoretic principles. According to Bub (2004, 2005) the philosophical significance of the theorem is that quantum theory should be regarded as a ``principle'' theory about (quantum) information rather than a ``constructive'' theory about the dynamics of quantum systems. Here we criticize Bub's principle approach arguing that if the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics remains intact then there is no escape route from solving the measurement problem by constructive theories. We further propose a (Wigner--type) thought experiment that we argue demonstrates that quantum mechanics on the information--theoretic approach is incomplete

    Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and the gang: The true history of the concepts of limit and shadow

    Full text link
    Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy all used one or another form of approximate equality, or the idea of discarding "negligible" terms, so as to obtain a correct analytic answer. Their inferential moves find suitable proxies in the context of modern theories of infinitesimals, and specifically the concept of shadow. We give an application to decreasing rearrangements of real functions.Comment: 35 pages, 2 figures, to appear in Notices of the American Mathematical Society 61 (2014), no.

    Effective Physical Processes and Active Information in Quantum Computing

    Get PDF
    The recent debate on hypercomputation has arisen new questions both on the computational abilities of quantum systems and the Church-Turing Thesis role in Physics. We propose here the idea of "effective physical process" as the essentially physical notion of computation. By using the Bohm and Hiley active information concept we analyze the differences between the standard form (quantum gates) and the non-standard one (adiabatic and morphogenetic) of Quantum Computing, and we point out how its Super-Turing potentialities derive from an incomputable information source in accordance with Bell's constraints. On condition that we give up the formal concept of "universality", the possibility to realize quantum oracles is reachable. In this way computation is led back to the logic of physical world.Comment: 10 pages; Added references for sections 2 and

    Linear logic for constructive mathematics

    Full text link
    We show that numerous distinctive concepts of constructive mathematics arise automatically from an interpretation of "linear higher-order logic" into intuitionistic higher-order logic via a Chu construction. This includes apartness relations, complemented subsets, anti-subgroups and anti-ideals, strict and non-strict order pairs, cut-valued metrics, and apartness spaces. We also explain the constructive bifurcation of classical concepts using the choice between multiplicative and additive linear connectives. Linear logic thus systematically "constructivizes" classical definitions and deals automatically with the resulting bookkeeping, and could potentially be used directly as a basis for constructive mathematics in place of intuitionistic logic.Comment: 39 page
    • 

    corecore