Proving Correctness of Imperative Programs by Linearizing Constrained Horn Clauses

We present a method for verifying the correctness of imperative programs which is based on the automated transformation of their specifications. Given a program prog, we consider a partial correctness specification of the form $\{\varphi\}$ prog $\{\psi\}$, where the assertions $\varphi$ and $\psi$ are predicates defined by a set Spec of possibly recursive Horn clauses with linear arithmetic (LA) constraints in their premise (also called constrained Horn clauses). The verification method consists in constructing a set PC of constrained Horn clauses whose satisfiability implies that $\{\varphi\}$ prog $\{\psi\}$ is valid. We highlight some limitations of state-of-the-art constrained Horn clause solving methods, here called LA-solving methods, which prove the satisfiability of the clauses by looking for linear arithmetic interpretations of the predicates. In particular, we prove that there exist some specifications that cannot be proved valid by any of those LA-solving methods. These specifications require the proof of satisfiability of a set PC of constrained Horn clauses that contain nonlinear clauses (that is, clauses with more than one atom in their premise). Then, we present a transformation, called linearization, that converts PC into a set of linear clauses (that is, clauses with at most one atom in their premise). We show that several specifications that could not be proved valid by LA-solving methods, can be proved valid after linearization. We also present a strategy for performing linearization in an automatic way and we report on some experimental results obtained by using a preliminary implementation of our method.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), Proceedings of ICLP 201

Enhancing Predicate Pairing with Abstraction for Relational Verification

Relational verification is a technique that aims at proving properties that relate two different program fragments, or two different program runs. It has been shown that constrained Horn clauses (CHCs) can effectively be used for relational verification by applying a CHC transformation, called predicate pairing, which allows the CHC solver to infer relations among arguments of different predicates. In this paper we study how the effects of the predicate pairing transformation can be enhanced by using various abstract domains based on linear arithmetic (i.e., the domain of convex polyhedra and some of its subdomains) during the transformation. After presenting an algorithm for predicate pairing with abstraction, we report on the experiments we have performed on over a hundred relational verification problems by using various abstract domains. The experiments have been performed by using the VeriMAP transformation and verification system, together with the Parma Polyhedra Library (PPL) and the Z3 solver for CHCs.Comment: Pre-proceedings paper presented at the 27th International Symposium on Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR 2017), Namur, Belgium, 10-12 October 2017 (arXiv:1708.07854

Scalable Logic Defined Static Analysis

Logic languages such as Datalog have been proposed as a method for specifying flexible and customisable static analysers. Using Datalog, various classes of static analyses can be expressed precisely and succinctly, requiring fewer lines of code than hand-crafted analysers. In this paradigm, a static analysis specification is encoded by a set of declarative logic rules and an o -the-shelf solver is used to compute the result of the static analysis. Unfortunately, when large-scale analyses are employed, Datalog-based tools currently fail to scale in comparison to hand-crafted static analysers. As a result, Datalog-based analysers have largely remained an academic curiosity, rather than industrially respectful tools. This thesis outlines our e orts in understanding the sources of performance limitations in Datalog-based tools. We propose a novel evaluation technique that is predicated on the fact that in the case of static analysis, the logical specification is a design time artefact and hence does not change during evaluation. Thus, instead of directly evaluating Datalog rules, our approach leverages partial evaluation to synthesise a specialised static analyser from these rules. This approach enables a novel indexing optimisations that automatically selects an optimal set of indexes to speedup and minimise memory usage in the Datalog computation. Lastly, we explore the case of more expressive logics, namely, constrained Horn clause and their use in proving the correctness of programs. We identify a bottleneck in various symbolic evaluation algorithms that centre around Craig interpolation. We propose a method of improving these evaluation algorithms by a proposing a method of guiding theorem provers to discover relevant interpolants with respect to the input logic specification. The culmination of our work is implemented in a general-purpose and highperformance tool called Souffl´e. We describe Souffl´e and evaluate its performance experimentally, showing significant improvement over alternative techniques and its scalability in real-world industrial use cases

Data Abstraction: A General Framework to Handle Program Verification of Data Structures

Proving properties on programs accessing data structures such as arrays often requires universally quantified invariants, e.g., "all elements below index $i$ are nonzero''. In this research report, we propose a general data abstraction scheme operating on Horn formulas, into which we recast previously published abstractions. We show our instantiation scheme is relatively complete: the generated purely scalar Horn clauses have a solution (inductive invariants) if and only if the original problem has one expressible by the abstraction.Pour prouver des propriétés de programmes qui manipulent des structures de données comme des tableaux , nous avons besoin de savoir résoudre des formules comportant des quantificateurs universels: par exemple, “tous les éléments d’index inférieur à $i$ sont différents de 0”. Dans ce rapport de recherche, nous proposons une technique générale d’abstraction opérant sur des Clauses de Horn, qui permet de reformuler un certain nombre d’abstractions déjà publiées. Nous montrons que notre schéma d’abstraction est relativement complet: le système de clauses purement scalaires a une solution (sous forme d’invariants inductifs) si et seulement si le problème initial a une solution exprimable dans la logique de l’abstraction