The connection between an event structure semantics and an operational semantics for TCSP

The relation between an operational interleaving semantics for TSCP based on a transition system and a compositional true concurrency semantics based on event structures is studied. In particular we extend the consistency result of U. Goltz and R. Loogen [Ann. Soc. Math. Pol., Ser. IV, Fundam. Inf. 14, 39-73 (1991; Zbl 0717.68028)] for TCSP processes without recursion to the general case. Thus, we obtain for every TCSP process P that its operational meaning O(P) and the interleaving behaviour O(M[[P]]) which is derived from the event structure M[[P]] associated with P are bisimilar. (aus: Zentralblatt MATH

How to interpret and establish consistency results for semantics of concurrent programming languages

It is meaningful that a language is provided with several semantic descriptions: e.g. one which serves the needs of the implementor, another one that is suitable for specification and yet another one that will be used to explain the language to the user. In this case one has to guarantee that the various semantics are 'consistent'. The attempt of this paper is to clarify the notion 'consistency' and to present a general framework and theorems for consistency results

Tools and verification techniques for integrated formal methods

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

Fairness of components in system computations

In this paper we provide a simple characterization of (weak) fairness of components as defined by Costa and Stirling. The study is carried out at system specification level by resorting to a common process description language. This paper follows and exploits similar techniques as those developed in an earlier paper -- where fairness of actions was taken into account and was contrasted to the PAFAS timed operational semantics -- but the characterization of fair executions is based on a new semantics for PAFAS; it makes use of only two copies of each basic action instead of infinitely many and allows for a simple and finite representation of fair executions by using regular expressions. The new semantics can also be understood as describing timed behaviour of systems with upper time bounds. The paper discusses in detail how this new semantics differs from the old one, and why theses changes are necessary to properly capture fairness of components

Weak Sequential Composition in Process Algebras

n this paper we study a special operator for sequential composition, which is defined relative to a dependency relation over the actions of a given system. The idea is that actions which are not dependent (intuitively because they share no common resources) do not have to wait for one another to proceed, even if they are composed sequentially. Such a notion has been studied before in a linear-time setting, but until recently there has been no systematic investigation in the context of process algebras. We give a structural operational semantics for a process algebraic language containing such a sequential composition operator, which shows some interesting interplay with choice. We give a complete axiomatisation of strong bisimilarity and we show consistency of the operational semantics with an event-based denotational semantics developed recently by the second author. The axiom system allows to derive the communication closed layers law, which in the linear time setting has been shown to be a very useful instrument in correctness preserving transformations. We conclude with a couple of examples

Infinite possible worlds for process algebras

[VD98] propose to view a finite nondeterministic process as a specification for a set of deterministic implementations: its possible worlds or model space. Refinement amounts to inclusion of possible worlds. We consider here the extension to infinite processes. We study the properties of possible worlds semanties, answer in particular an open question concerning the relation between bisimulation and possible worlds equivalence and discuss operational aspects

Event structure semantics for multiparty sessions

We propose an interpretation of multiparty sessions as flow event structures, which allows concurrency between communications within a session to be explicitly represented. We show that this interpretation is equivalent, when the multiparty sessions can be described by global types, to an interpretation of global types as prime event structures.Nous proposons une interprétation des sessions multi-parties en structures d’événements à flux, permettant une représentation explicite de la concurrence entre les communications d’une session. Nous montrons que, lorsque les sessions peuvent être décrites par des types globaux, cette interprétation est équivalente à une interprétation des types globaux comme structures d’événements premières

Event structure semantics for multiparty sessions

We propose an interpretation of multiparty sessions as "Flow Event Structures", which allows concurrency within sessions to be explicitly represented. We show that this interpretation is equivalent, when the multiparty sessions can be described by global types, to an interpretation of such global types as "Prime Event Structures"

Verification in the Hierarchical Development of Reactive Systems

In many approaches to the verification of reactive systems, operational semantics are used to model systems whereas specifications are expressed in temporal logics. Most approaches however fail to handle changes of the specification but assume, that the initial specification is indeed the intended one. Changing the specification thus necessitates to find an accordingly adapted system and to carry out the verification from scratch. During a systems life cycle however, changes of the requirements and resources necessitate repeated adaptations of specifications. We here propose a method that supports syntactic action refinement (in the process algebra TCSP and the Modal Mu-Calculus) and allows to automatically obtain (a priori) correct reactive systems by hierarchically adding details to the according specifications