1,820 research outputs found
Most Expected Winner: An Interpretation of Winners over Uncertain Voter Preferences
It remains an open question how to determine the winner of an election when
voter preferences are incomplete or uncertain. One option is to assume some
probability space over the voting profile and select the Most Probable Winner
(MPW) -- the candidate or candidates with the best chance of winning. In this
paper, we propose an alternative winner interpretation, selecting the Most
Expected Winner (MEW) according to the expected performance of the candidates.
We separate the uncertainty in voter preferences into the generation step and
the observation step, which gives rise to a unified voting profile combining
both incomplete and probabilistic voting profiles. We use this framework to
establish the theoretical hardness of \mew over incomplete voter preferences,
and then identify a collection of tractable cases for a variety of voting
profiles, including those based on the popular Repeated Insertion Model (RIM)
and its special case, the Mallows model. We develop solvers customized for
various voter preference types to quantify the candidate performance for the
individual voters, and propose a pruning strategy that optimizes computation.
The performance of the proposed solvers and pruning strategy is evaluated
extensively on real and synthetic benchmarks, showing that our methods are
practical.Comment: This is the technical report of the following paper: Haoyue Ping and
Julia Stoyanovich. 2023. Most Expected Winner: An Interpretation of Winners
over Uncertain Voter Preferences. Proc. ACM Manag. Data, 1, N1, Article 22
(May 2023), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/358870
Structure in Dichotomous Preferences
Many hard computational social choice problems are known to become tractable
when voters' preferences belong to a restricted domain, such as those of
single-peaked or single-crossing preferences. However, to date, all algorithmic
results of this type have been obtained for the setting where each voter's
preference list is a total order of candidates. The goal of this paper is to
extend this line of research to the setting where voters' preferences are
dichotomous, i.e., each voter approves a subset of candidates and disapproves
the remaining candidates. We propose several analogues of the notions of
single-peaked and single-crossing preferences for dichotomous profiles and
investigate the relationships among them. We then demonstrate that for some of
these notions the respective restricted domains admit efficient algorithms for
computationally hard approval-based multi-winner rules.Comment: A preliminary version appeared in the proceedings of IJCAI 2015, the
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligenc
X THEN X: Manipulation of Same-System Runoff Elections
Do runoff elections, using the same voting rule as the initial election but
just on the winning candidates, increase or decrease the complexity of
manipulation? Does allowing revoting in the runoff increase or decrease the
complexity relative to just having a runoff without revoting? For both weighted
and unweighted voting, we show that even for election systems with simple
winner problems the complexity of manipulation, manipulation with runoffs, and
manipulation with revoting runoffs are independent, in the abstract. On the
other hand, for some important, well-known election systems we determine what
holds for each of these cases. For no such systems do we find runoffs lowering
complexity, and for some we find that runoffs raise complexity. Ours is the
first paper to show that for natural, unweighted election systems, runoffs can
increase the manipulation complexity
- …