9,457 research outputs found
Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment?
Many reasoning problems are based on the problem of satisfiability (SAT).
While SAT itself becomes easy when restricting the structure of the formulas in
a certain way, the situation is more opaque for more involved decision
problems. We consider here the CardMinSat problem which asks, given a
propositional formula and an atom , whether is true in some
cardinality-minimal model of . This problem is easy for the Horn
fragment, but, as we will show in this paper, remains -complete (and
thus -hard) for the Krom fragment (which is given by formulas in
CNF where clauses have at most two literals). We will make use of this fact to
study the complexity of reasoning tasks in belief revision and logic-based
abduction and show that, while in some cases the restriction to Krom formulas
leads to a decrease of complexity, in others it does not. We thus also consider
the CardMinSat problem with respect to additional restrictions to Krom formulas
towards a better understanding of the tractability frontier of such problems
Learning Tree Patterns from Example Graphs
This paper investigates the problem of learning tree patterns that return nodes with a given set of labels, from example graphs provided by the user. Example graphs are annotated by the user as being either positive or negative. The goal is then to determine whether there exists a tree pattern returning tuples of nodes with the given labels in each of the positive examples, but in none of the negative examples, and, furthermore, to find one such pattern if it exists. These are called the satisfiability and learning problems, respectively.
This paper thoroughly investigates the satisfiability and learning problems in a variety of settings. In particular, we consider example sets that (1) may contain only positive examples, or both positive and negative examples, (2) may contain directed or undirected graphs, and (3) may have multiple occurrences of labels or be uniquely labeled (to some degree). In addition, we consider tree patterns of different types that can allow, or prohibit, wildcard labeled nodes and descendant edges. We also consider two different semantics for mapping tree patterns to graphs. The complexity of satisfiability is determined for the different combinations of settings. For cases in which satisfiability is polynomial, it is also shown that learning is polynomial (This is non-trivial as satisfying patterns may be exponential in size). Finally, the minimal learning problem, i.e., that of finding a minimal-sized satisfying pattern, is studied for cases in which satisfiability is polynomial
Recursive Online Enumeration of All Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets
In various areas of computer science, we deal with a set of constraints to be
satisfied. If the constraints cannot be satisfied simultaneously, it is
desirable to identify the core problems among them. Such cores are called
minimal unsatisfiable subsets (MUSes). The more MUSes are identified, the more
information about the conflicts among the constraints is obtained. However, a
full enumeration of all MUSes is in general intractable due to the large number
(even exponential) of possible conflicts. Moreover, to identify MUSes
algorithms must test sets of constraints for their simultaneous satisfiabilty.
The type of the test depends on the application domains. The complexity of
tests can be extremely high especially for domains like temporal logics, model
checking, or SMT. In this paper, we propose a recursive algorithm that
identifies MUSes in an online manner (i.e., one by one) and can be terminated
at any time. The key feature of our algorithm is that it minimizes the number
of satisfiability tests and thus speeds up the computation. The algorithm is
applicable to an arbitrary constraint domain and its effectiveness demonstrates
itself especially in domains with expensive satisfiability checks. We benchmark
our algorithm against state of the art algorithm on Boolean and SMT constraint
domains and demonstrate that our algorithm really requires less satisfiability
tests and consequently finds more MUSes in given time limits
The Complexity of Computing Optimal Assignments of Generalized Propositional Formulae
We consider the problems of finding the lexicographically minimal (or
maximal) satisfying assignment of propositional formulae for different
restricted formula classes. It turns out that for each class from our
framework, the above problem is either polynomial time solvable or complete for
OptP. We also consider the problem of deciding if in the optimal assignment the
largest variable gets value 1. We show that this problem is either in P or P^NP
complete.Comment: 17 pages, 1 figur
On the Complexity of Finding Second-Best Abductive Explanations
While looking for abductive explanations of a given set of manifestations, an
ordering between possible solutions is often assumed. The complexity of
finding/verifying optimal solutions is already known. In this paper we consider
the computational complexity of finding second-best solutions. We consider
different orderings, and consider also different possible definitions of what a
second-best solution is
Satisfiability in multi-valued circuits
Satisfiability of Boolean circuits is among the most known and important
problems in theoretical computer science. This problem is NP-complete in
general but becomes polynomial time when restricted either to monotone gates or
linear gates. We go outside Boolean realm and consider circuits built of any
fixed set of gates on an arbitrary large finite domain. From the complexity
point of view this is strictly connected with the problems of solving equations
(or systems of equations) over finite algebras.
The research reported in this work was motivated by a desire to know for
which finite algebras there is a polynomial time algorithm that
decides if an equation over has a solution. We are also looking for
polynomial time algorithms that decide if two circuits over a finite algebra
compute the same function. Although we have not managed to solve these problems
in the most general setting we have obtained such a characterization for a very
broad class of algebras from congruence modular varieties. This class includes
most known and well-studied algebras such as groups, rings, modules (and their
generalizations like quasigroups, loops, near-rings, nonassociative rings, Lie
algebras), lattices (and their extensions like Boolean algebras, Heyting
algebras or other algebras connected with multi-valued logics including
MV-algebras).
This paper seems to be the first systematic study of the computational
complexity of satisfiability of non-Boolean circuits and solving equations over
finite algebras. The characterization results provided by the paper is given in
terms of nice structural properties of algebras for which the problems are
solvable in polynomial time.Comment: 50 page
The Connectivity of Boolean Satisfiability: Computational and Structural Dichotomies
Boolean satisfiability problems are an important benchmark for questions
about complexity, algorithms, heuristics and threshold phenomena. Recent work
on heuristics, and the satisfiability threshold has centered around the
structure and connectivity of the solution space. Motivated by this work, we
study structural and connectivity-related properties of the space of solutions
of Boolean satisfiability problems and establish various dichotomies in
Schaefer's framework.
On the structural side, we obtain dichotomies for the kinds of subgraphs of
the hypercube that can be induced by the solutions of Boolean formulas, as well
as for the diameter of the connected components of the solution space. On the
computational side, we establish dichotomy theorems for the complexity of the
connectivity and st-connectivity questions for the graph of solutions of
Boolean formulas. Our results assert that the intractable side of the
computational dichotomies is PSPACE-complete, while the tractable side - which
includes but is not limited to all problems with polynomial time algorithms for
satisfiability - is in P for the st-connectivity question, and in coNP for the
connectivity question. The diameter of components can be exponential for the
PSPACE-complete cases, whereas in all other cases it is linear; thus, small
diameter and tractability of the connectivity problems are remarkably aligned.
The crux of our results is an expressibility theorem showing that in the
tractable cases, the subgraphs induced by the solution space possess certain
good structural properties, whereas in the intractable cases, the subgraphs can
be arbitrary
Simplifying Random Satisfiability Problem by Removing Frustrating Interactions
How can we remove some interactions in a constraint satisfaction problem
(CSP) such that it still remains satisfiable? In this paper we study a modified
survey propagation algorithm that enables us to address this question for a
prototypical CSP, i.e. random K-satisfiability problem. The average number of
removed interactions is controlled by a tuning parameter in the algorithm. If
the original problem is satisfiable then we are able to construct satisfiable
subproblems ranging from the original one to a minimal one with minimum
possible number of interactions. The minimal satisfiable subproblems will
provide directly the solutions of the original problem.Comment: 21 pages, 16 figure
- …