1,742 research outputs found
Decision Problems for Nash Equilibria in Stochastic Games
We analyse the computational complexity of finding Nash equilibria in
stochastic multiplayer games with -regular objectives. While the
existence of an equilibrium whose payoff falls into a certain interval may be
undecidable, we single out several decidable restrictions of the problem.
First, restricting the search space to stationary, or pure stationary,
equilibria results in problems that are typically contained in PSPACE and NP,
respectively. Second, we show that the existence of an equilibrium with a
binary payoff (i.e. an equilibrium where each player either wins or loses with
probability 1) is decidable. We also establish that the existence of a Nash
equilibrium with a certain binary payoff entails the existence of an
equilibrium with the same payoff in pure, finite-state strategies.Comment: 22 pages, revised versio
The Complexity of Nash Equilibria in Simple Stochastic Multiplayer Games
We analyse the computational complexity of finding Nash equilibria in simple
stochastic multiplayer games. We show that restricting the search space to
equilibria whose payoffs fall into a certain interval may lead to
undecidability. In particular, we prove that the following problem is
undecidable: Given a game G, does there exist a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium
of G where player 0 wins with probability 1. Moreover, this problem remains
undecidable if it is restricted to strategies with (unbounded) finite memory.
However, if mixed strategies are allowed, decidability remains an open problem.
One way to obtain a provably decidable variant of the problem is restricting
the strategies to be positional or stationary. For the complexity of these two
problems, we obtain a common lower bound of NP and upper bounds of NP and
PSPACE respectively.Comment: 23 pages; revised versio
Pure Nash Equilibria in Concurrent Deterministic Games
We study pure-strategy Nash equilibria in multi-player concurrent
deterministic games, for a variety of preference relations. We provide a novel
construction, called the suspect game, which transforms a multi-player
concurrent game into a two-player turn-based game which turns Nash equilibria
into winning strategies (for some objective that depends on the preference
relations of the players in the original game). We use that transformation to
design algorithms for computing Nash equilibria in finite games, which in most
cases have optimal worst-case complexity, for large classes of preference
relations. This includes the purely qualitative framework, where each player
has a single omega-regular objective that she wants to satisfy, but also the
larger class of semi-quantitative objectives, where each player has several
omega-regular objectives equipped with a preorder (for instance, a player may
want to satisfy all her objectives, or to maximise the number of objectives
that she achieves.)Comment: 72 page
Infinite sequential Nash equilibrium
In game theory, the concept of Nash equilibrium reflects the collective
stability of some individual strategies chosen by selfish agents. The concept
pertains to different classes of games, e.g. the sequential games, where the
agents play in turn. Two existing results are relevant here: first, all finite
such games have a Nash equilibrium (w.r.t. some given preferences) iff all the
given preferences are acyclic; second, all infinite such games have a Nash
equilibrium, if they involve two agents who compete for victory and if the
actual plays making a given agent win (and the opponent lose) form a
quasi-Borel set. This article generalises these two results via a single
result. More generally, under the axiomatic of Zermelo-Fraenkel plus the axiom
of dependent choice (ZF+DC), it proves a transfer theorem for infinite
sequential games: if all two-agent win-lose games that are built using a
well-behaved class of sets have a Nash equilibrium, then all multi-agent
multi-outcome games that are built using the same well-behaved class of sets
have a Nash equilibrium, provided that the inverse relations of the agents'
preferences are strictly well-founded.Comment: 14 pages, will be published in LMCS-2011-65
The Complexity of Admissibility in Omega-Regular Games
Iterated admissibility is a well-known and important concept in classical
game theory, e.g. to determine rational behaviors in multi-player matrix games.
As recently shown by Berwanger, this concept can be soundly extended to
infinite games played on graphs with omega-regular objectives. In this paper,
we study the algorithmic properties of this concept for such games. We settle
the exact complexity of natural decision problems on the set of strategies that
survive iterated elimination of dominated strategies. As a byproduct of our
construction, we obtain automata which recognize all the possible outcomes of
such strategies
- …