17 research outputs found

    Sign-Compute-Resolve for Random Access

    Get PDF
    We present an approach to random access that is based on three elements: physical-layer network coding, signature codes and tree splitting. Upon occurrence of a collision, physical-layer network coding enables the receiver to decode the sum of the information that was transmitted by the individual users. For each user this information consists of the data that the user wants to communicate as well as the user's signature. As long as no more than KK users collide, their identities can be recovered from the sum of their signatures. A splitting protocol is used to deal with the case that more than KK users collide. We measure the performance of the proposed method in terms of user resolution rate as well as overall throughput of the system. The results show that our approach significantly increases the performance of the system even compared to coded random access, where collisions are not wasted, but are reused in successive interference cancellation.Comment: Accepted for presentation at 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computin

    Constructing codes

    Get PDF

    A Note on the Probability of Rectangles for Correlated Binary Strings

    Full text link
    Consider two sequences of nn independent and identically distributed fair coin tosses, X=(X1,…,Xn)X=(X_1,\ldots,X_n) and Y=(Y1,…,Yn)Y=(Y_1,\ldots,Y_n), which are ρ\rho-correlated for each jj, i.e. P[Xj=Yj]=1+ρ2\mathbb{P}[X_j=Y_j] = {1+\rho\over 2}. We study the question of how large (small) the probability P[X∈A,Y∈B]\mathbb{P}[X \in A, Y\in B] can be among all sets A,BβŠ‚{0,1}nA,B\subset\{0,1\}^n of a given cardinality. For sets ∣A∣,∣B∣=Θ(2n)|A|,|B| = \Theta(2^n) it is well known that the largest (smallest) probability is approximately attained by concentric (anti-concentric) Hamming balls, and this can be proved via the hypercontractive inequality (reverse hypercontractivity). Here we consider the case of ∣A∣,∣B∣=2Θ(n)|A|,|B| = 2^{\Theta(n)}. By applying a recent extension of the hypercontractive inequality of Polyanskiy-Samorodnitsky (J. Functional Analysis, 2019), we show that Hamming balls of the same size approximately maximize P[X∈A,Y∈B]\mathbb{P}[X \in A, Y\in B] in the regime of ρ→1\rho \to 1. We also prove a similar tight lower bound, i.e. show that for ρ→0\rho\to 0 the pair of opposite Hamming balls approximately minimizes the probability P[X∈A,Y∈B]\mathbb{P}[X \in A, Y\in B]

    The Bernoulli numerators

    Get PDF
    corecore