2,370 research outputs found

    Algorithms and lower bounds for de Morgan formulas of low-communication leaf gates

    Get PDF
    The class FORMULA[s]āˆ˜GFORMULA[s] \circ \mathcal{G} consists of Boolean functions computable by size-ss de Morgan formulas whose leaves are any Boolean functions from a class G\mathcal{G}. We give lower bounds and (SAT, Learning, and PRG) algorithms for FORMULA[n1.99]āˆ˜GFORMULA[n^{1.99}]\circ \mathcal{G}, for classes G\mathcal{G} of functions with low communication complexity. Let R(k)(G)R^{(k)}(\mathcal{G}) be the maximum kk-party NOF randomized communication complexity of G\mathcal{G}. We show: (1) The Generalized Inner Product function GIPnkGIP^k_n cannot be computed in FORMULA[s]āˆ˜GFORMULA[s]\circ \mathcal{G} on more than 1/2+Īµ1/2+\varepsilon fraction of inputs for s=oā€‰ā£(n2(kā‹…4kā‹…R(k)(G)ā‹…logā”(n/Īµ)ā‹…logā”(1/Īµ))2). s = o \! \left ( \frac{n^2}{ \left(k \cdot 4^k \cdot {R}^{(k)}(\mathcal{G}) \cdot \log (n/\varepsilon) \cdot \log(1/\varepsilon) \right)^{2}} \right). As a corollary, we get an average-case lower bound for GIPnkGIP^k_n against FORMULA[n1.99]āˆ˜PTFkāˆ’1FORMULA[n^{1.99}]\circ PTF^{k-1}. (2) There is a PRG of seed length n/2+O(sā‹…R(2)(G)ā‹…logā”(s/Īµ)ā‹…logā”(1/Īµ))n/2 + O\left(\sqrt{s} \cdot R^{(2)}(\mathcal{G}) \cdot\log(s/\varepsilon) \cdot \log (1/\varepsilon) \right) that Īµ\varepsilon-fools FORMULA[s]āˆ˜GFORMULA[s] \circ \mathcal{G}. For FORMULA[s]āˆ˜LTFFORMULA[s] \circ LTF, we get the better seed length O(n1/2ā‹…s1/4ā‹…logā”(n)ā‹…logā”(n/Īµ))O\left(n^{1/2}\cdot s^{1/4}\cdot \log(n)\cdot \log(n/\varepsilon)\right). This gives the first non-trivial PRG (with seed length o(n)o(n)) for intersections of nn half-spaces in the regime where Īµā‰¤1/n\varepsilon \leq 1/n. (3) There is a randomized 2nāˆ’t2^{n-t}-time #\#SAT algorithm for FORMULA[s]āˆ˜GFORMULA[s] \circ \mathcal{G}, where t=Ī©(nsā‹…logā”2(s)ā‹…R(2)(G))1/2.t=\Omega\left(\frac{n}{\sqrt{s}\cdot\log^2(s)\cdot R^{(2)}(\mathcal{G})}\right)^{1/2}. In particular, this implies a nontrivial #SAT algorithm for FORMULA[n1.99]āˆ˜LTFFORMULA[n^{1.99}]\circ LTF. (4) The Minimum Circuit Size Problem is not in FORMULA[n1.99]āˆ˜XORFORMULA[n^{1.99}]\circ XOR. On the algorithmic side, we show that FORMULA[n1.99]āˆ˜XORFORMULA[n^{1.99}] \circ XOR can be PAC-learned in time 2O(n/logā”n)2^{O(n/\log n)}

    Grothendieck inequalities for semidefinite programs with rank constraint

    Get PDF
    Grothendieck inequalities are fundamental inequalities which are frequently used in many areas of mathematics and computer science. They can be interpreted as upper bounds for the integrality gap between two optimization problems: a difficult semidefinite program with rank-1 constraint and its easy semidefinite relaxation where the rank constrained is dropped. For instance, the integrality gap of the Goemans-Williamson approximation algorithm for MAX CUT can be seen as a Grothendieck inequality. In this paper we consider Grothendieck inequalities for ranks greater than 1 and we give two applications: approximating ground states in the n-vector model in statistical mechanics and XOR games in quantum information theory.Comment: 22 page

    Simulating Quantum Correlations with Finite Communication

    Get PDF
    Assume Alice and Bob share some bipartite dd-dimensional quantum state. A well-known result in quantum mechanics says that by performing two-outcome measurements, Alice and Bob can produce correlations that cannot be obtained locally, i.e., with shared randomness alone. We show that by using only two bits of communication, Alice and Bob can classically simulate any such correlations. All previous protocols for exact simulation required the communication to grow to infinity with the dimension dd. Our protocol and analysis are based on a power series method, resembling Krivine's bound on Grothendieck's constant, and on the computation of volumes of spherical tetrahedra.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figures, preliminary version in IEEE FOCS 2007; to appear in SICOM

    Adiabatic Quantum State Generation and Statistical Zero Knowledge

    Get PDF
    The design of new quantum algorithms has proven to be an extremely difficult task. This paper considers a different approach to the problem, by studying the problem of 'quantum state generation'. This approach provides intriguing links between many different areas: quantum computation, adiabatic evolution, analysis of spectral gaps and groundstates of Hamiltonians, rapidly mixing Markov chains, the complexity class statistical zero knowledge, quantum random walks, and more. We first show that many natural candidates for quantum algorithms can be cast as a state generation problem. We define a paradigm for state generation, called 'adiabatic state generation' and develop tools for adiabatic state generation which include methods for implementing very general Hamiltonians and ways to guarantee non negligible spectral gaps. We use our tools to prove that adiabatic state generation is equivalent to state generation in the standard quantum computing model, and finally we show how to apply our techniques to generate interesting superpositions related to Markov chains.Comment: 35 pages, two figure

    Hardy is (almost) everywhere: nonlocality without inequalities for almost all entangled multipartite states

    Full text link
    We show that all nn-qubit entangled states, with the exception of tensor products of single-qubit and bipartite maximally-entangled states, admit Hardy-type proofs of non-locality without inequalities or probabilities. More precisely, we show that for all such states, there are local, one-qubit observables such that the resulting probability tables are logically contextual in the sense of Abramsky and Brandenburger, this being the general form of the Hardy-type property. Moreover, our proof is constructive: given a state, we show how to produce the witnessing local observables. In fact, we give an algorithm to do this. Although the algorithm is reasonably straightforward, its proof of correctness is non-trivial. A further striking feature is that we show that n+2n+2 local observables suffice to witness the logical contextuality of any nn-qubit state: two each for two for the parties, and one each for the remaining nāˆ’2n-2 parties.Comment: 23 pages. Submitted for publicatio
    • ā€¦
    corecore