1,889 research outputs found

    Implementation of Captcha as Graphical Passwords For Multi Security

    Get PDF
    To validate human users, passwords play a vital role in computer security. Graphical passwords offer more security than text-based passwords, this is due to the reason that the user replies on graphical passwords. Normal users choose regular or unforgettable passwords which can be easy to guess and are prone to Artificial Intelligence problems. Many harder to guess passwords involve more mathematical or computational complications. To counter these hard AI problems a new Captcha technology known as, Captcha as Graphical Password (CaRP), from a novel family of graphical password systems has been developed. CaRP is both a Captcha and graphical password scheme in one. CaRP mainly helps in hard AI problems and security issues like online guess attacks, relay attacks, and shoulder-surfing attacks if combined with dual view technologies. Pass-points, a new methodology from CaRP, addresses the image hotspot problem in graphical password systems which lead to weak passwords. CaRP also implements a combination of images or colors with text which generates session passwords, that helps in authentication because with session passwords every time a new password is generated and is used only once. To counter shoulder surfing, CaRP provides cheap security and usability and thus improves online security. CaRP is not a panacea; however, it gives protection and usability to some online applications for improving online security

    Cryptanalysis of LFSR-based Pseudorandom Generators - a Survey

    Full text link
    Pseudorandom generators based on linear feedback shift registers (LFSR) are a traditional building block for cryptographic stream ciphers. In this report, we review the general idea for such generators, as well as the most important techniques of cryptanalysis

    An End-to-end Plaintext-based Side-channel Collision Attack without Trace Segmentation

    Get PDF
    Side-channel Collision Attacks (SCCA) constitute a subset of non-profiling attacks that exploit information dependency leaked during cryptographic operations. Unlike traditional collision attacks, which seek instances where two different inputs to a cryptographic algorithm yield identical outputs, SCCAs specifically target the internal state, where identical outputs are more likely. In CHES 2023, Staib et al. presented a Deep Learning-based SCCA (DL-SCCA), which enhanced the attack performance while decreasing the required effort for leakage preprocessing. Nevertheless, this method inherits the conventional SCCA\u27s limitations, as it operates on trace segments reflecting the target operation explicitly, leading to issues such as portability and low tolerance to errors. This paper introduces an end-to-end plaintext-based SCCA to address these challenges. We leverage the bijective relationship between plaintext and secret data to label the leakage measurement with known information, then learn plaintext-based profiling models to depict leakages from varying operations. By comparing the leakage representations produced by the profiling model, an adversary can reveal the key difference. As an end-to-end approach, we propose an error correction scheme to rectify false predictions. Experimental results indicate our approach significantly surpasses DL-SCCA in terms of attack performance (e.g., success rate increased from 53\% to 100\%) and computational complexity (training time reduced from approximately 2 hours to 10 minutes). These findings underscore our method\u27s effectiveness and practicality in real-world attack scenarios

    Residual Vulnerabilities to Power side channel attacks of lightweight ciphers cryptography competition Finalists

    Get PDF
    The protection of communications between Internet of Things (IoT) devices is of great concern because the information exchanged contains vital sensitive data. Malicious agents seek to exploit those data to extract secret information about the owners or the system. Power side channel attacks are of great concern on these devices because their power consumption unintentionally leaks information correlatable to the device\u27s secret data. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of authenticated encryption with advanced data, in protecting communications with these devices. A comprehensive evaluation of the seven (out of 10) algorithm finalists of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) IoT lightweight cipher competition that do not integrate built‐in countermeasures is proposed. The study shows that, nonetheless, they still present some residual vulnerabilities to power side channel attacks (SCA). For five ciphers, an attack methodology as well as the leakage function needed to perform correlation power analysis (CPA) is proposed. The authors assert that Ascon, Sparkle, and PHOTON‐Beetle security vulnerability can generally be assessed with the security assumptions “Chosen ciphertext attack and leakage in encryption only, with nonce‐misuse resilience adversary (CCAmL1)” and “Chosen ciphertext attack and leakage in encryption only with nonce‐respecting adversary (CCAL1)”, respectively. However, the security vulnerability of GIFT‐COFB, Grain, Romulus, and TinyJambu can be evaluated more straightforwardly with publicly available leakage models and solvers. They can also be assessed simply by increasing the number of traces collected to launch the attack

    Systematic Characterization of Power Side Channel Attacks for Residual and Added Vulnerabilities

    Get PDF
    Power Side Channel Attacks have continued to be a major threat to cryptographic devices. Hence, it will be useful for designers of cryptographic systems to systematically identify which type of power Side Channel Attacks their designs remain vulnerable to after implementation. It’s also useful to determine which additional vulnerabilities they have exposed their devices to, after the implementation of a countermeasure or a feature. The goal of this research is to develop a characterization of power side channel attacks on different encryption algorithms\u27 implementations to create metrics and methods to evaluate their residual vulnerabilities and added vulnerabilities. This research studies the characteristics that influence the power side leakage, classifies them, and identifies both the residual vulnerabilities and the added vulnerabilities. Residual vulnerabilities are defined as the traits that leave the implementation of the algorithm still vulnerable to power Side Channel Attacks (SCA), sometimes despite the attempt at implementing countermeasures by the designers. Added vulnerabilities to power SCA are defined as vulnerabilities created or enhanced by the algorithm implementations and/or modifications. The three buckets in which we categorize the encryption algorithm implementations are: i. Countermeasures against power side channel attacks, ii. IC power delivery network impact to power leakage (including voltage regulators), iii. Lightweight ciphers and applications for the Internet of Things (IoT ) From the characterization of masking countermeasures, an example outcome developed is that masking schemes, when uniformly distributed random masks are used, are still vulnerable to collision power attacks. Another example outcome derived is that masked AES, when glitches occur, is still vulnerable to Differential Power Analysis (DPA). We have developed a characterization of power side-channel attacks on the hardware implementations of different symmetric encryption algorithms to provide a detailed analysis of the effectiveness of state-of-the-art countermeasures against local and remote power side-channel attacks. The characterization is accomplished by studying the attributes that influence power side-channel leaks, classifying them, and identifying both residual vulnerabilities and added vulnerabilities. The evaluated countermeasures include masking, hiding, and power delivery network scrambling. But, vulnerability to DPA depends largely on the quality of the leaked power, which is impacted by the characteristics of the device power delivery network. Countermeasures and deterrents to power side-channel attacks targeting the alteration or scrambling of the power delivery network have been shown to be effective against local attacks where the malicious agent has physical access to the target system. However, remote attacks that capture the leaked information from within the IC power grid are shown herein to be nonetheless effective at uncovering the secret key in the presence of these countermeasures/deterrents. Theoretical studies and experimental analysis are carried out to define and quantify the impact of integrated voltage regulators, voltage noise injection, and integration of on-package decoupling capacitors for both remote and local attacks. An outcome yielded by the studies is that the use of an integrated voltage regulator as a countermeasure is effective for a local attack. However, remote attacks are still effective and hence break the integrated voltage regulator countermeasure. From experimental analysis, it is observed that within the range of designs\u27 practical values, the adoption of on-package decoupling capacitors provides only a 1.3x increase in the minimum number of traces required to discover the secret key. However, the injection of noise in the IC power delivery network yields a 37x increase in the minimum number of traces to discover. Thus, increasing the number of on-package decoupling capacitors or the impedance between the local probing site and the IC power grid should not be relied on as countermeasures to power side-channel attacks, for remote attack schemes. Noise injection should be considered as it is more effective at scrambling the leaked signal to eliminate sensitive identifying information. However, the analysis and experiments carried out herein are applied to regular symmetric ciphers which are not suitable for protecting Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The protection of communications between IoT devices is of great concern because the information exchanged contains vital sensitive data. Malicious agents seek to exploit those data to extract secret information about the owners or the system. Power side channel attacks are of great concern on these devices because their power consumption unintentionally leaks information correlatable to the device\u27s secret data. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of authenticated encryption with advanced data (AEAD), in protecting communications with these devices. In this research, we have proposed a comprehensive evaluation of the ten algorithm finalists of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) IoT lightweight cipher competition. The study shows that, nonetheless, some still present some residual vulnerabilities to power side channel attacks (SCA). For five ciphers, we propose an attack methodology as well as the leakage function needed to perform correlation power analysis (CPA). We assert that Ascon, Sparkle, and PHOTON-Beetle security vulnerability can generally be assessed with the security assumptions Chosen ciphertext attack and leakage in encryption only, with nonce-misuse resilience adversary (CCAmL1) and Chosen ciphertext attack and leakage in encryption only with nonce-respecting adversary (CCAL1) , respectively. However, the security vulnerability of GIFT-COFB, Grain, Romulus, and TinyJambu can be evaluated more straightforwardly with publicly available leakage models and solvers. They can also be assessed simply by increasing the number of traces collected to launch the attack
    • 

    corecore