17,987 research outputs found
Newsletter / House of Finance, Goethe-UniversitÀt Frankfurt 3/12
Parallel Banking â Frankfurt Can Bring some Light into the Darkness_3
THOMAS SCHĂFER
Inflation and Growth: New Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Threshold Analysis_4
ALEXANDER BICK | STEPHANIE KREMER | DIETER NAUTZ
Who Benefits from Building Insurance Groups?_6
SEBASTIAN SCHLĂTTER | HELMUT GRĂNDL
IT Innovation: Mindfully Resisting the Bandwagon_8
ROMAN BECK | WOLFGANG KĂNIG | IMMANUEL PAHLKE | MARTIN WOLF
âThe Part-Time Master in Finance is GBS' Answer to the Bologna Processâ_10
UWE WALZ
House of Finance Wins New LOEWE Center_1
ÂżEs Ăștil diferenciar a los interlocks de acuerdo con el tipo de consejero (ejecutivo o no ejecutivo) que los posee? Su influencia sobre el rendimiento de la empresa
Taking the assumptions of the resource dependency theory as our starting point, the main objective
of this investigation is to gain an understanding of how and in what way board members who serve
on multiple boards (interlocks) can affect a firmâs profitability, and whether it is useful to consider the
derivation of these interlocks according to the type of board member (executive or non-executive) who
possesses them. Using dynamic panel data analysis (GMM) and a sample of 88 firms quoted on the
Spanish Continuous Market for the period 2005â2008, our results confirm the existence of a curvilinear
(inverted-U) relation between interlocks and firm performance. The results demonstrate that this relation
is only significant if we include the total number of external ties rather than just the number of links
generated by non-executive directors. We can also confirm that the degree of familiarity and shared
knowledge between board members (measured by average board tenure) affects this relationship.Partiendo de los supuestos de la teorĂa de dependencia de recursos, el principal objetivo de esta investigaciĂłn
pasa por conocer cĂłmo y de quĂ© forma la pertenencia de los consejeros a mĂșltiples consejos
(interlocks) podrĂa afectar a la rentabilidad de la empresa y si es importante considerar en esta relaciĂłn
la procedencia de los interlocks segĂșn la tipologĂa del consejero que lo ostente (consejeros ejecutivos
y no ejecutivos). Mediante un anålisis de datos de panel dinåmico (GMM), y a través de una muestra
de 88 empresas cotizadas en el Mercado Continuo espaËnol para el periodo 2005â2008, los resultados
obtenidos confirman que existe una relaciĂłn curvilĂnea (en forma de U invertida) entre los interlocks y el
rendimiento de la empresa, y que esta relaciĂłn es sĂłlo significativa si tenemos en cuenta el nĂșmero total
de vĂnculos externos, y no sĂłlo cuando tomamos en nĂșmero de vĂnculos generados por los consejeros
no-ejecutivos. Asimismo, podemos afirman que el grado de familiaridad y conocimiento mutuo entre los
miembros del consejo (medido por la permanencia media del consejo) influye sobre esta relaciĂłn
Smooth the Dying Pillow: Alaska Natives and Their Destruction [chapter]
This paper was originally presented in Symposium III, "Group Rights at the Close of the Twentieth Century: Strategies for Assisting the Fourth World; Session 3, Evaluating Strategies for Change" at the 12th International Congress, Commission on Folk Law and Legal Pluralism, International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Zagreb, Yugoslavia, Jul 1988. The paper as originally presented can be found at http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7350.The policy for Native self-determination in Alaska developed by the Congress and the state has sought to replace a tribal model of governance with a body of legislation which confirms land rights without the direct political involvement of Alaska Native villages. However, the author argues, the absence of tribes as formal political structures has contributed to a loss of self-determination among Alaska Natives and to serious negative effects on Native village life.The Pre-Land Claims Agenda: 1955-1965 /
The Land Claims Era: 1967-72 /
1988 â A Watershed /
Notes /
Bibliograph
Disaggregating U.S. Interests in International Law
The Constitution is so central to American identity that any concession of external constitutional constraints may constitute a threat to national self-determination. This explains the relative intensity of objections to international norms and institutions thought to compromise constitutional discretion, at least in the absence of countervailing interests
- âŠ