15 research outputs found
Generation and Analysis of Content for Physics-Based Video Games
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques that can assist with the creation and analysis of digital content is a broad and challenging task for researchers. This topic has been most prevalent in the field of game AI research, where games are used as a testbed for solving more complex real-world problems. One of the major issues with prior AI-assisted content creation methods for games has been a lack of direct comparability to real-world environments, particularly those with realistic physical properties to consider. Creating content for such environments typically requires physics-based reasoning, which imposes many additional complications and restrictions that must be considered. Addressing and developing methods that can deal with these physical constraints, even if they are only within simulated game environments, is an important and challenging task for AI techniques that intend to be used in real-world situations.
The research presented in this thesis describes several approaches to creating and analysing levels for the physics-based puzzle game Angry Birds, which features a realistic 2D environment. This research was multidisciplinary in nature and covers a wide variety of different AI fields, leading to this thesis being presented as a compilation of published work. The central part of this thesis consists of procedurally generating levels for physics-based games similar to those in Angry Birds. This predominantly involves creating and placing stable structures made up of many smaller blocks, as well as other level elements. Multiple approaches are presented, including both fully autonomous and human-AI collaborative methodologies. In addition, several analyses of Angry Birds levels were carried out using current state-of-the-art agents. A hyper-agent was developed that uses machine learning to estimate the performance of each agent in a portfolio for an unknown level, allowing it to select the one most likely to succeed. Agent performance on levels that contain deceptive or creative properties was also investigated, allowing determination of the current strengths and weaknesses of different AI techniques. The observed variability in performance across levels for different AI techniques led to the development of an adaptive level generation system, allowing for the dynamic creation of increasingly challenging levels over time based on agent performance analysis. An additional study also investigated the theoretical complexity of Angry Birds levels from a computational perspective.
While this research is predominately applied to video games with physics-based simulated environments, the challenges and problems solved by the proposed methods also have significant real-world potential and applications
The Difficulty of Novelty Detection in Open-World Physical Domains: An Application to Angry Birds
Detecting and responding to novel situations in open-world environments is a
key capability of human cognition. Current artificial intelligence (AI)
researchers strive to develop systems that can perform in open-world
environments. Novelty detection is an important ability of such AI systems. In
an open-world, novelties appear in various forms and the difficulty to detect
them varies. Therefore, to accurately evaluate the detection capability of AI
systems, it is necessary to investigate the difficulty to detect novelties. In
this paper, we propose a qualitative physics-based method to quantify the
difficulty of novelty detection focusing on open-world physical domains. We
apply our method in a popular physics simulation game, Angry Birds. We conduct
an experiment with human players with different novelties in Angry Birds to
validate our method. Results indicate that the calculated difficulty values are
in line with the detection difficulty of the human players
Game-based Platforms for Artificial Intelligence Research
Games have been the perfect test-beds for artificial intelligence research
for the characteristics that widely exist in real-world scenarios. Learning and
optimisation, decision making in dynamic and uncertain environments, game
theory, planning and scheduling, design and education are common research areas
shared between games and real-world problems. Numerous open-sourced games or
game-based environments have been implemented for studying artificial
intelligence. In addition to single- or multi-player, collaborative or
adversarial games, there has also been growing interest in implementing
platforms for creative design in recent years. Those platforms provide ideal
benchmarks for exploring and comparing artificial intelligence ideas and
techniques. This paper reviews the game-based platforms for artificial
intelligence research, discusses the research trend induced by the evolution of
those platforms, and gives an outlook
Generative Design in Minecraft: Chronicle Challenge
© 2016 ACC 2019We introduce the Chronicle Challenge as an optional addition to the Settlement Generation Challenge in Minecraft. One of the foci of the overall competition is adaptive procedural content generation (PCG), an arguably under-explored problem in computational creativity. In the base challenge, participants must generate new settlements that respond to and ideally interact with existing content in the world, such as the landscape or climate. The goal is to understand the underlying creative process, and to design better PCG systems. The Chronicle Challenge in particular focuses on the generation of a narrative based on the history of a generated settlement, expressed in natural language. We discuss the unique features of the Chronicle Challenge in comparison to other competitions, clarify the characteristics of a chronicle eligible for submission and describe the evaluation criteria. We furthermore draw on simulation-based approaches in computational storytelling as examples to how this challenge could be approached.Peer reviewe
Dual Indicators to Analyse AI Benchmarks: Difficulty, Discrimination, Ability and Generality
[EN] With the purpose of better analyzing the result of artificial intelligence (AI) benchmarks, we present two indicators on the side of the AI problems, difficulty and discrimination, and two indicators on the side of the AI systems, ability and generality. The first three are adapted from psychometric models in item response theory (IRT), whereas generality is defined as a new metric that evaluates whether an agent is consistently good at easy problems and bad at difficult ones. We illustrate how these key indicators give us more insight on the results of two popular benchmarks in AI, the Arcade Learning Environment (Atari 2600 games) and the General Video Game AI competition, and we include some guidelines to estimate and interpret these indicators for other AI benchmarks and competitions.This work was supported by the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Award FA9550-17-1-0287; in part by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MINECO under Grant TIN 2015-69175-C4-1-R; and in part by the Generalitat Valenciana PROMETEOII/2015/013. The work of F. Mart ' inez-Plumed was supported by INCIBE (Ayudas para la excelencia de los equipos de investigaci ' on avanzada en ciberseguridad), the European Commission, JRC's Centre for Advanced Studies, HUMAINT project (Expert Contract CT-EX2018D335821-101), and UPV PAID-06-18 Ref. SP20180210. The work of J. Hern ' andez-Orallo was supported in part by Salvador de Madariaga grant (PRX17/00467) from the Spanish MECD, in part by the BEST Grant (BEST/2017/045) from the GVA for research stays at the CFI, and in part by the FLI grant RFP2-152.Martínez-Plumed, F.; Hernández-Orallo, J. (2020). Dual Indicators to Analyse AI Benchmarks: Difficulty, Discrimination, Ability and Generality. IEEE Transactions on Games. 12(2):121-131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2018.2883773S12113112
The AI Settlement Generation Challenge in Minecraft : First Year Report
© 2020 Springer-Verlag. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in KI - Künstliche Intelligenz. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00635-0.This article outlines what we learned from the first year of the AI Settlement Generation Competition in Minecraft, a competition about producing AI programs that can generate interesting settlements in Minecraft for an unseen map. This challenge seeks to focus research into adaptive and holistic procedural content generation. Generating Minecraft towns and villages given existing maps is a suitable task for this, as it requires the generated content to be adaptive, functional, evocative and aesthetic at the same time. Here, we present the results from the first iteration of the competition. We discuss the evaluation methodology, present the different technical approaches by the competitors, and outline the open problems.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio
Physics-Based Task Generation through Causal Sequence of Physical Interactions
Performing tasks in a physical environment is a crucial yet challenging
problem for AI systems operating in the real world. Physics simulation-based
tasks are often employed to facilitate research that addresses this challenge.
In this paper, first, we present a systematic approach for defining a physical
scenario using a causal sequence of physical interactions between objects.
Then, we propose a methodology for generating tasks in a physics-simulating
environment using these defined scenarios as inputs. Our approach enables a
better understanding of the granular mechanics required for solving
physics-based tasks, thereby facilitating accurate evaluation of AI systems'
physical reasoning capabilities. We demonstrate our proposed task generation
methodology using the physics-based puzzle game Angry Birds and evaluate the
generated tasks using a range of metrics, including physical stability,
solvability using intended physical interactions, and accidental solvability
using unintended solutions. We believe that the tasks generated using our
proposed methodology can facilitate a nuanced evaluation of physical reasoning
agents, thus paving the way for the development of agents for more
sophisticated real-world applications.Comment: The 19th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive
Digital Entertainment (AIIDE-23