IJCAI-ECAI Workshop “Interactions between Analogical Reasoning and Machine Learning” (IARML 2022)

International audienceAnalogical reasoning is a remarkable capability of human reasoning, used to solve hard reasoning tasks. It consists in transferring knowledge from a source domain to a different, but somewhat similar, target domain by relying simultaneously on similarities and dissimilarities. In particular, analogical proportions, i.e., statements of the form “A is to B as C is to D", are the basis of analogical inference. Analogical reasoning is pertaining to case-based reasoning and it has contributed to multiple machine learning tasks such as classification, decision making, and automatic translation with competitive results. Moreover, analogical extrapolation can support dataset augmentation (analogical extension) for model learning,especially in environments with few labeled examples. Conversely, advanced neural techniques, such as representation learning, enabled efficient approaches to detecting and solving analogies in domains where symbolic approaches had shown their limits. However, recent approaches using deep learning architectures remain task and domain specific, and strongly rely on ad-hoc representations of objects, i.e., tailor made embeddings.The first workshop Interactions between Analogical Reasoning and Machine Learning (IARML) was hosted by the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 25th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-ECAI 2022). It brought together AI researchers at the cross roads of machine learning, cognitive sciences and knowledge representation and reasoning, who are interested by the various applications of analogical reasoning in machine learning or, conversely, of machine learning techniques to improve analogical reasoning. The IARML workshop aims to bridge gaps between different AI communities, including case-based reasoning, deep learning and neuro-symbolic machine learning. The workshop welcomed submissions of research papers on all topics at the intersection of analogical reasoning and machine learning. The submissions were subjected to a strict double-blind reviewing process that resulted in the selection of six original contributions and two invited talks, in addition to the two plenary keynote talks

Case based reasoning as a model for cognitive artificial intelligence.

Cognitive Systems understand the world through learning and experience. Case Based Reasoning (CBR) systems naturally capture knowledge as experiences in memory and they are able to learn new experiences to retain in their memory. CBR's retrieve and reuse reasoning is also knowledge-rich because of its nearest neighbour retrieval and analogy-based adaptation of retrieved solutions. CBR is particularly suited to domains where there is no well-defined theory, because they have a memory of experiences of what happened, rather than why/how it happened. CBR's assumption that 'similar problems have similar solutions' enables it to understand the contexts for its experiences and the 'bigger picture' from clusters of cases, but also where its similarity assumption is challenged. Here we explore cognition and meta-cognition for CBR through self-refl ection and introspection of both memory and retrieve and reuse reasoning. Our idea is to embed and exploit cognitive functionality such as insight, intuition and curiosity within CBR to drive robust, and even explainable, intelligence that will achieve problemsolving in challenging, complex, dynamic domains

Findings from a literature review

Mentzingen, H., António, N., & Bação, F. (2023). Automation of legal precedents retrieval: Findings from a literature review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2023, 1-22. [6660983]. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2292464/v1, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2292464/v2, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6660983---This work was supported by national funds through FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia), under the project-UIDB/04152/2020-Centro de Investigação em Gestão de Informação (MagIC)/NOVA IMS.Judges frequently rely their reasoning on precedents. Courts must preserve uniformity in decisions while, depending on the legal system, previous cases compel rulings. The search for methods to accurately identify similar previous cases is not new and has been a vital input, for example, to case-based reasoning (CBR) methodologies. This literature review offers a comprehensive analysis of the advancements in automating the identification of legal precedents, primarily focusing on the paradigm shift from manual knowledge engineering to the incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML). While multiple approaches harnessing NLP and ML show promise, none has emerged as definitively superior, and further validation through statistically significant samples and expert-provided ground truth is imperative. Additionally, this review employs text-mining techniques to streamline the survey process, providing an accurate and holistic view of the current research landscape. By delineating extant research gaps and suggesting avenues for future exploration, this review serves as both a summation and a call for more targeted, empirical investigations.publishersversionpublishe

Preferences in Case-Based Reasoning

Case-based reasoning (CBR) is a well-established problem solving paradigm that has been used in a wide range of real-world applications. Despite its great practical success, work on the theoretical foundations of CBR is still under way, and a coherent and universally applicable methodological framework is yet missing. The absence of such a framework inspired the motivation for the work developed in this thesis. Drawing on recent research on preference handling in Artificial Intelligence and related fields, the goal of this work is to develop a well theoretically-founded framework on the basis of formal concepts and methods for knowledge representation and reasoning with preferences