120,889 research outputs found

    Fast reoptimization for the minimum spanning tree problem

    Get PDF
    AbstractWe study reoptimization versions of the minimum spanning tree problem. The reoptimization setting can generally be formulated as follows: given an instance of the problem for which we already know some optimal solution, and given some “small” perturbations on this instance, is it possible to compute a new (optimal or at least near-optimal) solution for the modified instance without ex nihilo computation? We focus on two kinds of modifications: node-insertions and node-deletions. When k new nodes are inserted together with their incident edges, we mainly propose a fast strategy with complexity O(kn) which provides a max{2,3−(2/(k−1))}-approximation ratio, in complete metric graphs and another one that is optimal with complexity O(nlogn). On the other hand, when k nodes are deleted, we devise a strategy which in O(n) achieves approximation ratio bounded above by 2⌈|Lmax|/2⌉ in complete metric graphs, where Lmax is the longest deleted path and |Lmax| is the number of its edges. For any of the approximation strategies, we also provide lower bounds on their approximation ratios

    Spanning trees short or small

    Full text link
    We study the problem of finding small trees. Classical network design problems are considered with the additional constraint that only a specified number kk of nodes are required to be connected in the solution. A prototypical example is the kkMST problem in which we require a tree of minimum weight spanning at least kk nodes in an edge-weighted graph. We show that the kkMST problem is NP-hard even for points in the Euclidean plane. We provide approximation algorithms with performance ratio 2k2\sqrt{k} for the general edge-weighted case and O(k1/4)O(k^{1/4}) for the case of points in the plane. Polynomial-time exact solutions are also presented for the class of decomposable graphs which includes trees, series-parallel graphs, and bounded bandwidth graphs, and for points on the boundary of a convex region in the Euclidean plane. We also investigate the problem of finding short trees, and more generally, that of finding networks with minimum diameter. A simple technique is used to provide a polynomial-time solution for finding kk-trees of minimum diameter. We identify easy and hard problems arising in finding short networks using a framework due to T. C. Hu.Comment: 27 page

    A 2k2k-Vertex Kernel for Maximum Internal Spanning Tree

    Full text link
    We consider the parameterized version of the maximum internal spanning tree problem, which, given an nn-vertex graph and a parameter kk, asks for a spanning tree with at least kk internal vertices. Fomin et al. [J. Comput. System Sci., 79:1-6] crafted a very ingenious reduction rule, and showed that a simple application of this rule is sufficient to yield a 3k3k-vertex kernel. Here we propose a novel way to use the same reduction rule, resulting in an improved 2k2k-vertex kernel. Our algorithm applies first a greedy procedure consisting of a sequence of local exchange operations, which ends with a local-optimal spanning tree, and then uses this special tree to find a reducible structure. As a corollary of our kernel, we obtain a deterministic algorithm for the problem running in time 4knO(1)4^k \cdot n^{O(1)}

    Spanning trees with many leaves: new extremal results and an improved FPT algorithm

    Get PDF
    We present two lower bounds for the maximum number of leaves in a spanning tree of a graph. For connected graphs without triangles, with minimum degree at least three, we show that a spanning tree with at least (n+4)/3 leaves exists, where n is the number of vertices of the graph. For connected graphs with minimum degree at least three, that contain D diamonds induced by vertices of degree three (a diamond is a K4 minus one edge), we show that a spanning tree exists with at least (2n-D+12)/7 leaves. The proofs use the fact that spanning trees with many leaves correspond to small connected dominating sets. Both of these bounds are best possible for their respective graph classes. For both bounds simple polynomial time algorithms are given that find spanning trees satisfying the bounds. \ud \ud The second bound is used to find a new fastest FPT algorithm for the Max-Leaf Spanning Tree problem. This problem asks whether a graph G on n vertices has a spanning tree with at least k leaves. The time complexity of our algorithm is f(k)g(n), where g(n) is a polynomial, and f(k) Î O(8.12k).\ud \ud \u
    corecore