4,740 research outputs found
The complexity of conservative finite-valued CSPs
We study the complexity of valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSP). A
problem from VCSP is characterised by a \emph{constraint language}, a fixed set
of cost functions over a finite domain. An instance of the problem is specified
by a sum of cost functions from the language and the goal is to minimise the
sum. We consider the case of so-called \emph{conservative} languages; that is,
languages containing all unary cost functions, thus allowing arbitrary
restrictions on the domains of the variables. This problem has been studied by
Bulatov [LICS'03] for -valued languages (i.e. CSP), by
Cohen~\etal\ (AIJ'06) for Boolean domains, by Deineko et al. (JACM'08) for
-valued cost functions (i.e. Max-CSP), and by Takhanov (STACS'10) for
-valued languages containing all finite-valued unary cost
functions (i.e. Min-Cost-Hom).
We give an elementary proof of a complete complexity classification of
conservative finite-valued languages: we show that every conservative
finite-valued language is either tractable or NP-hard. This is the \emph{first}
dichotomy result for finite-valued VCSPs over non-Boolean domains.Comment: 15 page
The complexity of finite-valued CSPs
We study the computational complexity of exact minimisation of
rational-valued discrete functions. Let be a set of rational-valued
functions on a fixed finite domain; such a set is called a finite-valued
constraint language. The valued constraint satisfaction problem,
, is the problem of minimising a function given as
a sum of functions from . We establish a dichotomy theorem with respect
to exact solvability for all finite-valued constraint languages defined on
domains of arbitrary finite size.
We show that every constraint language either admits a binary
symmetric fractional polymorphism in which case the basic linear programming
relaxation solves any instance of exactly, or
satisfies a simple hardness condition that allows for a
polynomial-time reduction from Max-Cut to
The Complexity of Weighted Boolean #CSP with Mixed Signs
We give a complexity dichotomy for the problem of computing the partition
function of a weighted Boolean constraint satisfaction problem. Such a problem
is parameterized by a set of rational-valued functions, which generalize
constraints. Each function assigns a weight to every assignment to a set of
Boolean variables. Our dichotomy extends previous work in which the weight
functions were restricted to being non-negative. We represent a weight function
as a product of the form (-1)^s g, where the polynomial s determines the sign
of the weight and the non-negative function g determines its magnitude. We show
that the problem of computing the partition function (the sum of the weights of
all possible variable assignments) is in polynomial time if either every weight
function can be defined by a "pure affine" magnitude with a quadratic sign
polynomial or every function can be defined by a magnitude of "product type"
with a linear sign polynomial. In all other cases, computing the partition
function is FP^#P-complete.Comment: 24 page
A PCP Characterization of AM
We introduce a 2-round stochastic constraint-satisfaction problem, and show
that its approximation version is complete for (the promise version of) the
complexity class AM. This gives a `PCP characterization' of AM analogous to the
PCP Theorem for NP. Similar characterizations have been given for higher levels
of the Polynomial Hierarchy, and for PSPACE; however, we suggest that the
result for AM might be of particular significance for attempts to derandomize
this class.
To test this notion, we pose some `Randomized Optimization Hypotheses'
related to our stochastic CSPs that (in light of our result) would imply
collapse results for AM. Unfortunately, the hypotheses appear over-strong, and
we present evidence against them. In the process we show that, if some language
in NP is hard-on-average against circuits of size 2^{Omega(n)}, then there
exist hard-on-average optimization problems of a particularly elegant form.
All our proofs use a powerful form of PCPs known as Probabilistically
Checkable Proofs of Proximity, and demonstrate their versatility. We also use
known results on randomness-efficient soundness- and hardness-amplification. In
particular, we make essential use of the Impagliazzo-Wigderson generator; our
analysis relies on a recent Chernoff-type theorem for expander walks.Comment: 18 page
The power of Sherali-Adams relaxations for general-valued CSPs
We give a precise algebraic characterisation of the power of Sherali-Adams
relaxations for solvability of valued constraint satisfaction problems to
optimality. The condition is that of bounded width which has already been shown
to capture the power of local consistency methods for decision CSPs and the
power of semidefinite programming for robust approximation of CSPs.
Our characterisation has several algorithmic and complexity consequences. On
the algorithmic side, we show that several novel and many known valued
constraint languages are tractable via the third level of the Sherali-Adams
relaxation. For the known languages, this is a significantly simpler algorithm
than the previously obtained ones. On the complexity side, we obtain a
dichotomy theorem for valued constraint languages that can express an injective
unary function. This implies a simple proof of the dichotomy theorem for
conservative valued constraint languages established by Kolmogorov and Zivny
[JACM'13], and also a dichotomy theorem for the exact solvability of
Minimum-Solution problems. These are generalisations of Minimum-Ones problems
to arbitrary finite domains. Our result improves on several previous
classifications by Khanna et al. [SICOMP'00], Jonsson et al. [SICOMP'08], and
Uppman [ICALP'13].Comment: Full version of an ICALP'15 paper (arXiv:1502.05301
The Power of Linear Programming for Valued CSPs
A class of valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs) is characterised
by a valued constraint language, a fixed set of cost functions on a finite
domain. An instance of the problem is specified by a sum of cost functions from
the language with the goal to minimise the sum. This framework includes and
generalises well-studied constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) and maximum
constraint satisfaction problems (Max-CSPs).
Our main result is a precise algebraic characterisation of valued constraint
languages whose instances can be solved exactly by the basic linear programming
relaxation. Using this result, we obtain tractability of several novel and
previously widely-open classes of VCSPs, including problems over valued
constraint languages that are: (1) submodular on arbitrary lattices; (2)
bisubmodular (also known as k-submodular) on arbitrary finite domains; (3)
weakly (and hence strongly) tree-submodular on arbitrary trees.Comment: Corrected a few typo
The complexity of weighted boolean #CSP*
This paper gives a dichotomy theorem for the complexity of computing the partition
function of an instance of a weighted Boolean constraint satisfaction problem. The problem
is parameterized by a finite set F of nonnegative functions that may be used to assign weights to
the configurations (feasible solutions) of a problem instance. Classical constraint satisfaction problems
correspond to the special case of 0,1-valued functions. We show that computing the partition
function, i.e., the sum of the weights of all configurations, is FP#P-complete unless either (1) every
function in F is of “product type,” or (2) every function in F is “pure affine.” In the remaining cases,
computing the partition function is in P
- …