A framework for incremental learning of logic programs

AbstractIn this paper, a framework for incremental learning is proposed. The predicates already learned are used as background knowledge in learning new predicates in this framework. The programs learned in this way have nice modular structure with conceptually separate components. This modularity gives the advantages of portability, reliability and efficient compilation and execution.Starting with a simple idea of Miyano et al. [21,22] for identifying classes of programs which satisfy the condition that all the terms occurring SLD-derivations starting with a query are no bigger than the terms in the initial query, we identify a reasonably big class of polynomial time learnable logic programs. These programs can be learned from a given sequence of examples and a logic program defining the already known predicates. Our class properly contains the class of innermost simple programs of [32] and the class of hereditary programs of [21,22]. Standard programs for gcd, multiplication, quick-sort, reverse and merge are a few examples of programs that can be handled by our results but not by the earlier results of [21,22, 32]

The design and implementation of a relational programming system.

The declarative class of computer languages consists mainly of two paradigms - the logic and the functional. Much research has been devoted in recent years to the integration of the two with the aim of securing the advantages of both without retaining their disadvantages. To date this research has, arguably, been less fruitful than initially hoped. A large number of composite functional/logical languages have been proposed but have generally been marred by the lack of a firm, cohesive, mathematical basis. More recently new declarative paradigms, equational and constraint languages, have been advocated. These however do not fully encompass those features we perceive as being central to functional and logic languages. The crucial functional features are higher-order definitions, static polymorphic typing, applicative expressions and laziness. The crucial logic features are ability to reason about both functional and non-functional relationships and to handle computations involving search. This thesis advocates a new declarative paradigm which lies midway between functional and logic languages - the so-called relational paradigm. In a relationallanguage program and data alike are denoted by relations. All expressions are relations constructed from simpler expressions using operators which form a relational algebra. The impetus for use of relations in a declarative language comes from observations concerning their connection to functional and logic programming. Relations are mathematically more general than functions modelling non-functional as well as functional relationships. They also form the basis of many logic languages, for example, Prolog. This thesis proposes a new relational language based entirely on binary relations, named Drusilla. We demonstrate the functional and logic aspects of Drusilla. It retains the higher-order objects and polymorphism found in modern functional languages but handles non-determinism and models relationships between objects in the manner of a logic language with notion of algorithm being composed of logic and control elements. Different programming styles - functional, logic and relational- are illustrated. However, such expressive power does not come for free; it has associated with it a high cost of implementation. Two main techniques are used in the necessarily complex language interpreter. A type inference system checks programs to ensure they are meaningful and simultaneously performs automatic representation selection for relations. A symbolic manipulation system transforms programs to improve. efficiency of expressions and to increase the number of possible representations for relations while preserving program meaning