Controversies and progress on standardization of large-scale brain network nomenclature

Progress in scientific disciplines is accompanied by standardization of terminology. Network neuroscience, at the level of macroscale organization of the brain, is beginning to confront the challenges associated with developing a taxonomy of its fundamental explanatory constructs. The Workgroup for HArmonized Taxonomy of NETworks (WHATNET) was formed in 2020 as an Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM)-endorsed best practices committee to provide recommendations on points of consensus, identify open questions, and highlight areas of ongoing debate in the service of moving the field toward standardized reporting of network neuroscience results. The committee conducted a survey to catalog current practices in large-scale brain network nomenclature. A few well-known network names (e.g., default mode network) dominated responses to the survey, and a number of illuminating points of disagreement emerged. We summarize survey results and provide initial considerations and recommendations from the workgroup. This perspective piece includes a selective review of challenges to this enterprise, including (1) network scale, resolution, and hierarchies; (2) interindividual variability of networks; (3) dynamics and nonstationarity of networks; (4) consideration of network affiliations of subcortical structures; and (5) consideration of multimodal information. We close with minimal reporting guidelines for the cognitive and network neuroscience communities to adopt

Brain enhancement through cognitive training: A new insight from brain connectome

Owing to the recent advances in neurotechnology and the progress in understanding of brain cognitive functions, improvements of cognitive performance or acceleration of learning process with brain enhancement systems is not out of our reach anymore, on the contrary, it is a tangible target of contemporary research. Although a variety of approaches have been proposed, we will mainly focus on cognitive training interventions, in which learners repeatedly perform cognitive tasks to improve their cognitive abilities. In this review article, we propose that the learning process during the cognitive training can be facilitated by an assistive system monitoring cognitive workloads using electroencephalography (EEG) biomarkers, and the brain connectome approach can provide additional valuable biomarkers for facilitating leaners' learning processes. For the purpose, we will introduce studies on the cognitive training interventions, EEG biomarkers for cognitive workload, and human brain connectome. As cognitive overload and mental fatigue would reduce or even eliminate gains of cognitive training interventions, a real-time monitoring of cognitive workload can facilitate the learning process by flexibly adjusting difficulty levels of the training task. Moreover, cognitive training interventions should have effects on brain sub-networks, not on a single brain region, and graph theoretical network metrics quantifying topological architecture of the brain network can differentiate with respect to individual cognitive states as well as to different individuals' cognitive abilities, suggesting that the connectome is a valuable approach for tracking the learning progress. Although only a few studies have exploited the connectome approach for studying alterations of the brain network induced by cognitive training interventions so far, we believe that it would be a useful technique for capturing improvements of cognitive function

Anatomical and Functional Organization of Domain-General Brain Regions

How does complex brain activity organize thought and behaviour? Theoretical proposals have long emphasized that intelligent behaviour must be supported by a flexible control system. Numerous brain imaging studies identified a domain-general or “multiple-demand” (MD) brain system co-activated accompanying many tasks and is hypothesised to play a central role in cognitive control. However, the limited spatial localization provided by traditional imaging methods precluded a consensus regarding its anatomy and physiology. To address these limitations, the experiments in chapters 2 and 3 capitalize on novel multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods developed by the Human Connectome Project. Chapter 2 delineated nine cortical MD patches per hemisphere and subdivided them into 10 regions forming a core of most strongly activated and functionally interconnected regions, surrounded by a penumbra of 17 additional regions. MD activations were also identified in specific subcortical and cerebellar regions. Chapter 3 investigated the relation between the newly defined MD regions and previously identified sensory-biased cortical regions. Contrasting auditory and visual low working memory demands revealed the strongest sensory-biases are localized just outside of MD regions. And additional working memory demands revealed MD activations showed no sensory biases. Chapter 4 used human electrophysiological recordings from the lateral frontal cortex to functionally map cognitive control regions during awake neurosurgeries. By contrasting a hard vs easy cognitive demand, spectral analysis revealed localized power increases in the gamma range (>30 Hz) that overlap with a canonical mask of the fronto-parietal control network. These findings contrast with spatially non-specific power decreases in the beta range (12-30 Hz). Thus, using similar task difficulty manipulations, electrophysiology and MRI functional signals converged on localizing lateral frontal regions related to cognitive control and support their clinical potential for intraoperative mapping of cognitive control. All together, the distributed anatomical organization, mosaic functional preferences, and strong functional interconnectivity of MD regions, suggest a skeleton for integrating and organizing the diverse components of cognitive operations. The precise anatomical delineation of MD regions provides the groundwork for refined analyses of their functions

Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency fluctuations in bold fMRI

Traditional fMRI utilizes blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast to map brain activity. BOLD signal is sensitive to the hemodynamic changes associated with brain activity, and gives an indirect measure of brain activity. Low frequency fluctuations (LFFs) have been observed in the BOLD signal even in the absence of any anesthetic agent, and the correlations between the fluctuations from different brain regions has been used to map functional connectivity in the brain. Most studies involving spontaneous fluctuations in the BOLD signal extract connectivity patterns that show relationships between brain areas that are maintained over the length of the scanning session. The research presented in this document investigates the spatiotemporal dynamics of the BOLD fluctuations to identify common spatiotemporal patterns within a scan. First, the presence of a visually detectable spatiotemporal propagation pattern is demonstrated by utilizing single-slice data with high spatial and temporal resolution. The pattern consists of lateral-medial propagation of BOLD signal, demonstrating the presence of time-varying features in spontaneous BOLD fluctuations. Further, a novel pattern finding algorithm is developed for detecting repeated spatiotemporal patterns in BOLD fMRI data. The algorithm is applied to high temporal resolution T2*-weighted multislice images obtained from rats and humans in the absence of any task or stimulation. In rats, the primary pattern consists of waves of high signal intensity, propagating in a lateral-medial direction across the cortex, replicating the results obtained using visual observation. In humans, the most common spatiotemporal pattern consisted of an alteration between activation of areas comprising the "default-mode" (e.g., posterior cingulate and anterior medial prefrontal cortices) and the "task-positive" (e.g., superior parietal and premotor cortices) networks. Signal propagation from focal starting points is also observed. The pattern finding algorithm is shown to be reasonably insensitive to the variation in user-defined parameters, and the results are consistent within and between subjects. This novel approach for probing the spontaneous network activity of the brain has implications for the interpretation of conventional functional connectivity studies, and may increase the amount of information that can be obtained from neuroimaging data.Ph.D.Committee Chair: Keilholz, Shella; Committee Member: Hu, Xiaoping; Committee Member: Jaeger, Dieter; Committee Member: Sathian, Krish; Committee Member: Schumacher, Eri

Influence of wiring cost on the large-scale architecture of human cortical connectivity

In the past two decades some fundamental properties of cortical connectivity have been discovered: small-world structure, pronounced hierarchical and modular organisation, and strong core and rich-club structures. A common assumption when interpreting results of this kind is that the observed structural properties are present to enable the brain's function. However, the brain is also embedded into the limited space of the skull and its wiring has associated developmental and metabolic costs. These basic physical and economic aspects place separate, often conflicting, constraints on the brain's connectivity, which must be characterized in order to understand the true relationship between brain structure and function. To address this challenge, here we ask which, and to what extent, aspects of the structural organisation of the brain are conserved if we preserve specific spatial and topological properties of the brain but otherwise randomise its connectivity. We perform a comparative analysis of a connectivity map of the cortical connectome both on high- and low-resolutions utilising three different types of surrogate networks: spatially unconstrained (‘random’), connection length preserving (‘spatial’), and connection length optimised (‘reduced’) surrogates. We find that unconstrained randomisation markedly diminishes all investigated architectural properties of cortical connectivity. By contrast, spatial and reduced surrogates largely preserve most properties and, interestingly, often more so in the reduced surrogates. Specifically, our results suggest that the cortical network is less tightly integrated than its spatial constraints would allow, but more strongly segregated than its spatial constraints would necessitate. We additionally find that hierarchical organisation and rich-club structure of the cortical connectivity are largely preserved in spatial and reduced surrogates and hence may be partially attributable to cortical wiring constraints. In contrast, the high modularity and strong s-core of the high-resolution cortical network are significantly stronger than in the surrogates, underlining their potential functional relevance in the brain