10,185 research outputs found
Complexity Theory, Game Theory, and Economics: The Barbados Lectures
This document collects the lecture notes from my mini-course "Complexity
Theory, Game Theory, and Economics," taught at the Bellairs Research Institute
of McGill University, Holetown, Barbados, February 19--23, 2017, as the 29th
McGill Invitational Workshop on Computational Complexity.
The goal of this mini-course is twofold: (i) to explain how complexity theory
has helped illuminate several barriers in economics and game theory; and (ii)
to illustrate how game-theoretic questions have led to new and interesting
complexity theory, including recent several breakthroughs. It consists of two
five-lecture sequences: the Solar Lectures, focusing on the communication and
computational complexity of computing equilibria; and the Lunar Lectures,
focusing on applications of complexity theory in game theory and economics. No
background in game theory is assumed.Comment: Revised v2 from December 2019 corrects some errors in and adds some
recent citations to v1 Revised v3 corrects a few typos in v
Bounding Rationality by Discounting Time
Consider a game where Alice generates an integer and Bob wins if he can
factor that integer. Traditional game theory tells us that Bob will always win
this game even though in practice Alice will win given our usual assumptions
about the hardness of factoring.
We define a new notion of bounded rationality, where the payoffs of players
are discounted by the computation time they take to produce their actions. We
use this notion to give a direct correspondence between the existence of
equilibria where Alice has a winning strategy and the hardness of factoring.
Namely, under a natural assumption on the discount rates, there is an
equilibriumwhere Alice has a winning strategy iff there is a linear-time
samplable distribution with respect to which Factoring is hard on average.
We also give general results for discounted games over countable action
spaces, including showing that any game with bounded and computable payoffs has
an equilibrium in our model, even if each player is allowed a countable number
of actions. It follows, for example, that the Largest Integer game has an
equilibrium in our model though it has no Nash equilibria or epsilon-Nash
equilibria.Comment: To appear in Proceedings of The First Symposium on Innovations in
Computer Scienc
Separable and Low-Rank Continuous Games
In this paper, we study nonzero-sum separable games, which are continuous
games whose payoffs take a sum-of-products form. Included in this subclass are
all finite games and polynomial games. We investigate the structure of
equilibria in separable games. We show that these games admit finitely
supported Nash equilibria. Motivated by the bounds on the supports of mixed
equilibria in two-player finite games in terms of the ranks of the payoff
matrices, we define the notion of the rank of an n-player continuous game and
use this to provide bounds on the cardinality of the support of equilibrium
strategies. We present a general characterization theorem that states that a
continuous game has finite rank if and only if it is separable. Using our rank
results, we present an efficient algorithm for computing approximate equilibria
of two-player separable games with fixed strategy spaces in time polynomial in
the rank of the game
On the Complexity of Nash Equilibria in Anonymous Games
We show that the problem of finding an {\epsilon}-approximate Nash
equilibrium in an anonymous game with seven pure strategies is complete in
PPAD, when the approximation parameter {\epsilon} is exponentially small in the
number of players.Comment: full versio
Learning the Structure and Parameters of Large-Population Graphical Games from Behavioral Data
We consider learning, from strictly behavioral data, the structure and
parameters of linear influence games (LIGs), a class of parametric graphical
games introduced by Irfan and Ortiz (2014). LIGs facilitate causal strategic
inference (CSI): Making inferences from causal interventions on stable behavior
in strategic settings. Applications include the identification of the most
influential individuals in large (social) networks. Such tasks can also support
policy-making analysis. Motivated by the computational work on LIGs, we cast
the learning problem as maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) of a generative
model defined by pure-strategy Nash equilibria (PSNE). Our simple formulation
uncovers the fundamental interplay between goodness-of-fit and model
complexity: good models capture equilibrium behavior within the data while
controlling the true number of equilibria, including those unobserved. We
provide a generalization bound establishing the sample complexity for MLE in
our framework. We propose several algorithms including convex loss minimization
(CLM) and sigmoidal approximations. We prove that the number of exact PSNE in
LIGs is small, with high probability; thus, CLM is sound. We illustrate our
approach on synthetic data and real-world U.S. congressional voting records. We
briefly discuss our learning framework's generality and potential applicability
to general graphical games.Comment: Journal of Machine Learning Research. (accepted, pending
publication.) Last conference version: submitted March 30, 2012 to UAI 2012.
First conference version: entitled, Learning Influence Games, initially
submitted on June 1, 2010 to NIPS 201
- …