Human-Robot Collaboration for Kinesthetic Teaching

Recent industrial interest in producing smaller volumes of products in shorter time frames, in contrast to mass production in previous decades, motivated the introduction of human–robot collaboration (HRC) in industrial settings, as an attempt to increase flexibility in manufacturing applications by incorporating human intelligence and dexterity to these processes. This thesis presents methods for improving the involvement of human operators in industrial settings where robots are present, with a particular focus on kinesthetic teaching, i.e., manually guiding the robot to define or correct its motion, since it can facilitate non-expert robot programming.To increase flexibility in the manufacturing industry implies a loss of a fixed structure of the industrial environment, which increases the uncertainties in the shared workspace between humans and robots. Two methods have been proposed in this thesis to mitigate such uncertainty. First, null-space motion was used to increase the accuracy of kinesthetic teaching by reducing the joint static friction, or stiction, without altering the execution of the robotic task. This was possible since robots used in HRC, i.e., collaborative robots, are often designed with additional degrees of freedom (DOFs) for a greater dexterity. Second, to perform effective corrections of the motion of the robot through kinesthetic teaching in partially-unknown industrial environments, a fast identification of the source of robot–environment contact is necessary. Fast contact detection and classification methods in literature were evaluated, extended, and modified to use them in kinesthetic teaching applications for an assembly task. For this, collaborative robots that are made compliant with respect to their external forces/torques (as an active safety mechanism) were used, and only embedded sensors of the robot were considered.Moreover, safety is a major concern when robotic motion occurs in an inherently uncertain scenario, especially if humans are present. Therefore, an online variation of the compliant behavior of the robot during its manual guidance by a human operator was proposed to avoid undesired parts of the workspace of the robot. The proposed method used safety control barrier functions (SCBFs) that considered the rigid-body dynamics of the robot, and the method’s stability was guaranteed using a passivity-based energy-storage formulation that includes a strict Lyapunov function.All presented methods were tested experimentally on a real collaborative robot

Symbiotic Assembly Systems – A New Paradigm

AbstractAssembly systems have been pressed in recent years to provide highly adaptable and quickly deployable solutions in order to deal with unpredictable changes following market trends. This has led to the development of multiple paradigms, namely Flexible Assembly System, Holonic Assembly Systems, Evolvable Assembly Systems, Modular Assembly systems, etc. Mostly these focus on increasing availability of automation, however this focus has overshadowed the human element in assembly systems. The lack of a clear human element in these approaches resulted in non-necessary automation and increase complexity. This paper proposes a new paradigm of Symbiotic Assembly Systems (SAS) in order to integrate the human aspects into these developments. The motivation is human actors should be treated as an intrinsic component of assembly systems. This would result in a system that can take advantage of its component's individual strengths (human or machines), and create a symbiotic environment. Beyond machine automation, human interventions in the system need not only to be modelled as processes but also integrated into the whole system operation. The idea builds on biological systems and their ability to establish symbiotic environments resulting in optimal collaborations. This paper proposes the conceptual vision of Symbiotic Assembly Systems and identifies the necessary developments required to achieve such paradigm. Furthermore it reports on how the developments from other paradigms can be integrated into SAS. An illustrative example is presented to demonstrate the potential of this approach

Mobile Robotics

The book is a collection of ten scholarly articles and reports of experiences and perceptions concerning pedagogical practices with mobile robotics.“This work is funded by CIEd – Research Centre on Education, project UID/CED/01661/2019, Institute of Education, University of Minho, through national funds of FCT/MCTES-PT.

A comparison of processing techniques for producing prototype injection moulding inserts.

This project involves the investigation of processing techniques for producing low-cost moulding inserts used in the particulate injection moulding (PIM) process. Prototype moulds were made from both additive and subtractive processes as well as a combination of the two. The general motivation for this was to reduce the entry cost of users when considering PIM. PIM cavity inserts were first made by conventional machining from a polymer block using the pocket NC desktop mill. PIM cavity inserts were also made by fused filament deposition modelling using the Tiertime UP plus 3D printer. The injection moulding trials manifested in surface finish and part removal defects. The feedstock was a titanium metal blend which is brittle in comparison to commodity polymers. That in combination with the mesoscale features, small cross-sections and complex geometries were considered the main problems. For both processing methods, fixes were identified and made to test the theory. These consisted of a blended approach that saw a combination of both the additive and subtractive processes being used. The parts produced from the three processing methods are investigated and their respective merits and issues are discussed