21 research outputs found
Tableau-based decision procedure for the multi-agent epistemic logic with all coalitional operators for common and distributed knowledge
We develop a conceptually clear, intuitive, and feasible decision procedure
for testing satisfiability in the full multi-agent epistemic logic CMAEL(CD)
with operators for common and distributed knowledge for all coalitions of
agents mentioned in the language. To that end, we introduce Hintikka structures
for CMAEL(CD) and prove that satisfiability in such structures is equivalent to
satisfiability in standard models. Using that result, we design an incremental
tableau-building procedure that eventually constructs a satisfying Hintikka
structure for every satisfiable input set of formulae of CMAEL(CD) and closes
for every unsatisfiable input set of formulae.Comment: Substantially extended and corrected version of arXiv:0902.2125. To
appear in: Logic Journal of the IGPL, special issue on Formal Aspects of
Multi-Agent System
Complexity and Expressivity of Branching- and Alternating-Time Temporal Logics with Finitely Many Variables
We show that Branching-time temporal logics CTL and CTL*, as well as
Alternating-time temporal logics ATL and ATL*, are as semantically expressive
in the language with a single propositional variable as they are in the full
language, i.e., with an unlimited supply of propositional variables. It follows
that satisfiability for CTL, as well as for ATL, with a single variable is
EXPTIME-complete, while satisfiability for CTL*, as well as for ATL*, with a
single variable is 2EXPTIME-complete,--i.e., for these logics, the
satisfiability for formulas with only one variable is as hard as satisfiability
for arbitrary formulas.Comment: Prefinal version of the published pape
Reducing Validity in Epistemic ATL to Validity in Epistemic CTL
We propose a validity preserving translation from a subset of epistemic
Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL) to epistemic Computation Tree Logic
(CTL). The considered subset of epistemic ATL is known to have the finite model
property and decidable model-checking. This entails the decidability of
validity but the implied algorithm is unfeasible. Reducing the validity problem
to that in a corresponding system of CTL makes the techniques for automated
deduction for that logic available for the handling of the apparently more
complex system of ATL.Comment: In Proceedings SR 2013, arXiv:1303.007
A Faster Tableau for CTL*
There have been several recent suggestions for tableau systems for deciding
satisfiability in the practically important branching time temporal logic known
as CTL*. In this paper we present a streamlined and more traditional tableau
approach built upon the author's earlier theoretical work.
Soundness and completeness results are proved. A prototype implementation
demonstrates the significantly improved performance of the new approach on a
range of test formulas. We also see that it compares favourably to state of the
art, game and automata based decision procedures.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2013, arXiv:1307.416
Tableau-based decision procedures for logics of strategic ability in multi-agent systems
We develop an incremental tableau-based decision procedures for the
Alternating-time temporal logic ATL and some of its variants.
While running within the theoretically established complexity upper bound, we
claim that our tableau is practically more efficient in the average case than
other decision procedures for ATL known so far. Besides, the ease of its
adaptation to variants of ATL demonstrates the flexibility of the proposed
procedure.Comment: To appear in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 48 page
Automated Synthesis of Tableau Calculi
This paper presents a method for synthesising sound and complete tableau
calculi. Given a specification of the formal semantics of a logic, the method
generates a set of tableau inference rules that can then be used to reason
within the logic. The method guarantees that the generated rules form a
calculus which is sound and constructively complete. If the logic can be shown
to admit finite filtration with respect to a well-defined first-order semantics
then adding a general blocking mechanism provides a terminating tableau
calculus. The process of generating tableau rules can be completely automated
and produces, together with the blocking mechanism, an automated procedure for
generating tableau decision procedures. For illustration we show the
workability of the approach for a description logic with transitive roles and
propositional intuitionistic logic.Comment: 32 page
Strategic logics : complexity, completeness and expressivity
by transferring normative attributes from an agent to another. Such interactions are called delegation. Formal models of delegation and control were studied in, e.g., [189, 149, 191]. In this work, we consider the scenario where agents delegate control over propositions to other agents. The distinction between controllable and uncontrollable propositions stems from areas like discrete event systems and control theory, where, e.g., Boutilier [39] studied control in the context of deontic logic. Control and controllable propositions were also studied in [52, 66, 249, 248]. We now give an overview of the thesis. The main purpose of Chapter 2 is to introduce basic concepts and notation and to review relevant literature. The first section presents a brief survey on modal logic. Then, in sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, we introduce epistemic, temporal and strategic modal logics and state known results that characterise their expressivity and computational complexity. In particular, we consider variants of ATL as extensions of branching-time logics. With such ATL-like logics we can describe dynamic multi-agent interactions. In Section 2.5, we discuss extensions of ATL with epistemic notions. Additionally, we suggest a framework for memory-bounded strategic reasoning. In particular, we introduce an epistemic variant of ATL that accounts for agents with limited memory resources as this case was neglected in the literature to date. In Chapter 3, we investigate the computational complexity of ATL and its epistemic extension ATEL. We show in detail how 'the complexity of the satisfiability problem for both logics can be settled at ExpTIME-complete. The part of the chapter about ATL is based on the paper 'ATL Satisfiability is Indeed ExpTIME-COmplete' by Walther, Lutz, Wolter and Wooldridge in the Journal of Logic and Computation, 2006 (265)' and the part about ATEL is based on the paper 'ATEL with Common and Distributed Knowledge is ExpTime-Complete' by Walther which was presented at the 4th Workshop on Methods for Modalities, Humbolt University, Berlin, December 1-2, 2005 [264]. In Chapter 4, we aim to extend the expressiveness of ATL without increasing its computational complexity. We introduce explicit names for strategies in the object language and extend modal operators with the possibility to bind agents to strategy names. In this way, we can fix the decisions of agents that possibly belong to several coalitions. By identifying the behaviqur of agents, we can reason about the effects of agents changing coalitions. Dynamic coalitions provide more flexibility to adapt abilities to a changing environment. We investigate the expressivity of the resulting logic ATLES and compare it to ATL and ATL*. Moreover, we formulate two model checking problems for ATLES and investigate their complexity as well as the complexity of the satisfiability problem for ATLES. Additionally, we present a complete axiomatisation. This chapter is based on the paper 'Alternating-time Temporal Logic with Explicit Strategies' by Walther, van der Hoek and Wooldridge which is going to presented at the 11th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), Brussels, Belgium, June 25-27, 2007 [266]