Design and Realization of Fully-digital Microwave and Mm-wave Multi-beam Arrays with FPGA/RF-SOC Signal Processing

There has been a constant increase in data-traffic and device-connections in mobile wireless communications, which led the fifth generation (5G) implementations to exploit mm-wave bands at 24/28 GHz. The next-generation wireless access point (6G and beyond) will need to adopt large-scale transceiver arrays with a combination of multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) theory and fully digital multi-beam beamforming. The resulting high gain array factors will overcome the high path losses at mm-wave bands, and the simultaneous multi-beams will exploit the multi-directional channels due to multi-path effects and improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Such access points will be based on electronic systems which heavily depend on the integration of RF electronics with digital signal processing performed in Field programmable gate arrays (FPGA)/ RF-system-on-chip (SoC). This dissertation is directed towards the investigation and realization of fully-digital phased arrays that can produce wideband simultaneous multi-beams with FPGA or RF-SoC digital back-ends. The first proposed approach is a spatial bandpass (SBP) IIR filter-based beamformer, and is based on the concepts of space-time network resonance. A 2.4 GHz, 16-element array receiver, has been built for real-time experimental verification of this approach. The second and third approaches are respectively based on Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) theory, and a lens plus focal planar array theory. Lens based approach is essentially an analog model of DFT. These two approaches are verified for a 28 GHz 800 MHz mm-wave implementation with RF-SoC as the digital back-end. It has been shown that for all proposed multibeam beamformer implementations, the measured beams are well aligned with those of the simulated. The proposed approaches differ in terms of their architectures, hardware complexity and costs, which will be discussed as this dissertation opens up. This dissertation also presents an application of multi-beam approaches for RF directional sensing applications to explore white spaces within the spatio-temporal spectral regions. A real-time directional sensing system is proposed to capture the white spaces within the 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi band. Further, this dissertation investigates the effect of electro-magnetic (EM) mutual coupling in antenna arrays on the real-time performance of fully-digital transceivers. Different algorithms are proposed to uncouple the mutual coupling in digital domain. The first one is based on finding the MC transfer function from the measured S-parameters of the antenna array and employing it in a Frost FIR filter in the beamforming backend. The second proposed method uses fast algorithms to realize the inverse of mutual coupling matrix via tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices having sparse factors. A 5.8 GHz 32-element array and 1-7 GHz 7-element tightly coupled dipole array (TCDA) have been employed to demonstrate the proof-of-concept of these algorithms

Digital and Mixed Domain Hardware Reduction Algorithms and Implementations for Massive MIMO

Emerging 5G and 6G based wireless communications systems largely rely on multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) systems to reduce inherently extensive path losses, facilitate high data rates, and high spatial diversity. Massive MIMO systems used in mmWave and sub-THz applications consists of hundreds perhaps thousands of antenna elements at base stations. Digital beamforming techniques provide the highest flexibility and better degrees of freedom for phased antenna arrays as compared to its analog and hybrid alternatives but has the highest hardware complexity. Conventional digital beamformers at the receiver require a dedicated analog to digital converter (ADC) for every antenna element, leading to ADCs for elements. The number of ADCs is the key deterministic factor for the power consumption of an antenna array system. The digital hardware consists of fast Fourier transform (FFT) cores with a multiplier complexity of (N log2N) for an element system to generate multiple beams. It is required to reduce the mixed and digital hardware complexities in MIMO systems to reduce the cost and the power consumption, while maintaining high performance. The well-known concept has been in use for ADCs to achieve reduced complexities. An extension of the architecture to multi-dimensional domain is explored in this dissertation to implement a single port ADC to replace ADCs in an element system, using the correlation of received signals in the spatial domain. This concept has applications in conventional uniform linear arrays (ULAs) as well as in focal plane array (FPA) receivers. Our analysis has shown that sparsity in the spatio-temporal frequency domain can be exploited to reduce the number of ADCs from N to where . By using the limited field of view of practical antennas, multiple sub-arrays are combined without interferences to achieve a factor of K increment in the information carrying capacity of the ADC systems. Applications of this concept include ULAs and rectangular array systems. Experimental verifications were done for a element, 1.8 - 2.1 GHz wideband array system to sample using ADCs. This dissertation proposes that frequency division multiplexing (FDM) receiver outputs at an intermediate frequency (IF) can pack multiple (M) narrowband channels with a guard band to avoid interferences. The combined output is then sampled using a single wideband ADC and baseband channels are retrieved in the digital domain. Measurement results were obtained by employing a element, 28 GHz antenna array system to combine channels together to achieve a 75% reduction of ADC requirement. Implementation of FFT cores in the digital domain is not always exact because of the finite precision. Therefore, this dissertation explores the possibility of approximating the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix to achieve reduced hardware complexities at an allowable cost of accuracy. A point approximate DFT (ADFT) core was implemented on digital hardware using radix-32 to achieve savings in cost, size, weight and power (C-SWaP) and synthesized for ASIC at 45-nm technology

Algorithms and Circuits for Analog-Digital Hybrid Multibeam Arrays

Fifth generation (5G) and beyond wireless communication systems will rely heavily on larger antenna arrays combined with beamforming to mitigate the high free-space path-loss that prevails in millimeter-wave (mmW) and above frequencies. Sharp beams that can support wide bandwidths are desired both at the transmitter and the receiver to leverage the glut of bandwidth available at these frequency bands. Further, multiple simultaneous sharp beams are imperative for such systems to exploit mmW/sub-THz wireless channels using multiple reflected paths simultaneously. Therefore, multibeam antenna arrays that can support wider bandwidths are a key enabler for 5G and beyond systems. In general, N-beam systems using N-element antenna arrays will involve circuit complexities of the order of N2. This dissertation investigates new analog, digital and hybrid low complexity multibeam beamforming algorithms and circuits for reducing the associated high size, weight, and power (SWaP) complexities in larger multibeam arrays. The research efforts on the digital beamforming aspect propose the use of a new class of discrete Fourier transform (DFT) approximations for multibeam generation to eliminate the need for digital multipliers in the beamforming circuitry. For this, 8-, 16- and 32-beam multiplierless multibeam algorithms have been proposed for uniform linear array applications. A 2.4 GHz 16-element array receiver setup and a 5.8 GHz 32-element array receiver system which use field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) as digital backend have been built for real-time experimental verification of the digital multiplierless algorithms. The multiplierless algorithms have been experimentally verified by digitally measuring beams. It has been shown that the measured beams from the multiplierless algorithms are in good agreement with the exact counterpart algorithms. Analog realizations of the proposed approximate DFT transforms have also been investigated leading to low-complex, high bandwidth circuits in CMOS. Further, a novel approach for reducing the circuit complexity of analog true-time delay (TTD) N-beam beamforming networks using N-element arrays has been proposed for wideband squint-free operation. A sparse factorization of the N-beam delay Vandermonde beamforming matrix is used to reduce the total amount of TTD elements that are needed for obtaining N number of beams in a wideband array. The method has been verified using measured responses of CMOS all-pass filters (APFs). The wideband squint-free multibeam algorithm is also used to propose a new low-complexity hybrid beamforming architecture targeting future 5G mmW systems. Apart from that, the dissertation also explores multibeam beamforming architectures for uniform circular arrays (UCAs). An algorithm having N log N circuit complexity for simultaneous generation of N-beams in an N-element UCA is explored and verified

Integrated Microwave Photonic Processors using Waveguide Mesh Cores

Integrated microwave photonics changes the scaling laws of information and communication systems offering architectural choices that combine photonics with electronics to optimize performance, power, footprint and cost. Application Specific Photonic Integrated Circuits, where particular circuits/chips are designed to optimally perform particular functionalities, require a considerable number of design and fabrication iterations leading to long-development times and costly implementations. A different approach inspired by electronic Field Programmable Gate Arrays is the programmable Microwave Photonic processor, where a common hardware implemented by the combination of microwave, photonic and electronic subsystems, realizes different functionalities through programming. Here, we propose the first-ever generic-purpose Microwave Photonic processor concept and architecture. This versatile processor requires a powerful end-to-end field-based analytical model to optimally configure all their subsystems as well as to evaluate their performance in terms of the radiofrequency gain, noise and dynamic range. Therefore, we develop a generic model for integrated Microwave Photonics systems. The key element of the processor is the reconfigurable optical core. It requires high flexibility and versatility to enable reconfigurable interconnections between subsystems as well as the synthesis of photonic integrated circuits. For this element, we focus on a 2-dimensional photonic waveguide mesh based on the interconnection of tunable couplers. Within the framework of this Thesis, we have proposed two novel interconnection schemes, aiming for a mesh design with a high level of versatility. Focusing on the hexagonal waveguide mesh, we explore the synthesis of a high variety of photonic integrated circuits and particular Microwave Photonics applications that can potentially be performed on a single hardware. In addition, we report the first-ever demonstration of such reconfigurable waveguide mesh in silicon. We demonstrate a world-record number of functionalities on a single photonic integrated circuit enabling over 30 different functionalities from the 100 that could be potentially obtained with a simple seven hexagonal cell structure. The resulting device can be applied to different fields including communications, chemical and biomedical sensing, signal processing, multiprocessor networks as well as quantum information systems. Our work is an important step towards this paradigm and sets the base for a new era of generic-purpose photonic integrated systems.Los dispositivos integrados de fotónica de microondas ofrecen soluciones optimizadas para los sistemas de información y comunicación. Generalmente, están compuestos por diferentes arquitecturas en las que subsistemas ópticos y electrónicos se integran para optimizar las prestaciones, el consumo, el tamaño y el coste del dispositivo final. Hasta ahora, los circuitos/chips de propósito específico se han diseñado para proporcionar una funcionalidad concreta, requiriendo así un número considerable de iteraciones entre las etapas de diseño, fabricación y medida, que origina tiempos de desarrollo largos y costes demasiado elevados. Una alternativa, inspirada por las FPGA (del inglés Field Programmable Gate Array), es el procesador fotónico programable. Este dispositivo combina la integración de subsistemas de microondas, ópticos y electrónicos para realizar, mediante la programación de los mismos y sus interconexiones, diferentes funcionalidades. En este trabajo, proponemos por primera vez el concepto del procesador de propósito general, así como su arquitectura. Además, con el fin de diseñar, optimizar y evaluar las prestaciones básicas del dispositivo, hemos desarrollado un modelo analítico extremo a extremo basado en las componentes del campo electromagnético. El modelo desarrollado proporciona como resultado la ganancia, el ruido y el rango dinámico global para distintas configuraciones de modulación y detección, en función de los subsistemas y su configuración. El elemento principal del procesador es su núcleo óptico reconfigurable. Éste requiere un alto grado de flexibilidad y versatilidad para reconfigurar las interconexiones entre los distintos subsistemas y para sintetizar los circuitos para el procesado óptico. Para este subsistema, proponemos el diseño de guías de onda reconfigurables para la creación de mallados bidimensionales. En el marco de esta tesis, hemos propuesto dos nuevos nodos de interconexión óptica para mallas reconfigurables, con el objetivo de obtener un mayor grado de versatilidad. Una vez escogida la malla hexagonal para el núcleo del procesador, hemos analizado la configuración de un gran número de circuitos fotónicos integrados y de funcionalidades de fotónica de microondas. El trabajo se ha completado con la demonstración de la primera malla reconfigurable integrada en un chip de silicio, demostrando además la síntesis de 30 de las 100 funcionalidades que potencialmente se pueden obtener con la malla diseñada compuesta de 7 celdas hexagonales. Este hecho supone un record frente a los sistemas de propósito específico. El sistema puede aplicarse en diferentes campos como las comunicaciones, los sensores químicos y biomédicos, el procesado de señales, la gestión y procesamiento de redes y los sistemas de información cuánticos. El conjunto del trabajo realizado representa un paso importante en la evolución de este paradigma, y sienta las bases para una nueva era de dispositivos fotónicos de propósito general.Els dispositius integrats de Fotònica de Microones oferixen solucions optimitzades per als sistemes d'informació i comunicació. Generalment, estan compostos per diferents arquitectures en què subsistemes òptics i electrònics s'integren per a optimitzar les prestacions, el consum, la grandària i el cost del dispositiu final. Fins ara, els circuits/xips de propòsit específic s'han dissenyat per a proporcionar una funcionalitat concreta, requerint així un nombre considerable d'iteracions entre les etapes de disseny, fabricació i mesura, que origina temps de desenrotllament llargs i costos massa elevats. Una alternativa, inspirada per les FPGA (de l'anglés Field Programmable Gate Array), és el processador fotònic programable. Este dispositiu combina la integració de subsistemes de microones, òptics i electrònics per a realitzar, per mitjà de la programació dels mateixos i les seues interconnexions, diferents funcionalitats. En este treball proposem per primera vegada el concepte del processador de propòsit general, així com la seua arquitectura. A més, a fi de dissenyar, optimitzar i avaluar les prestacions bàsiques del dispositiu, hem desenrotllat un model analític extrem a extrem basat en els components del camp electromagnètic. El model desenrotllat proporciona com resultat el guany, el soroll i el rang dinàmic global per a distintes configuracions de modulació i detecció, en funció dels subsistemes i la seua configuració. L'element principal del processador és el seu nucli òptic reconfigurable. Este requerix un alt grau de flexibilitat i versatilitat per a reconfigurar les interconnexions entre els distints subsistemes i per a sintetitzar els circuits per al processat òptic. Per a este subsistema, proposem el disseny de guies d'onda reconfigurables per a la creació de mallats bidimensionals. En el marc d'esta tesi, hem proposat dos nous nodes d'interconnexió òptica per a malles reconfigurables, amb l'objectiu d'obtindre un major grau de versatilitat. Una vegada triada la malla hexagonal per al nucli del processador, hem analitzat la configuració d'un gran nombre de circuits fotónicos integrats i de funcionalitats de fotónica de microones. El treball s'ha completat amb la demostració de la primera malla reconfigurable integrada en un xip de silici, demostrant a més la síntesi de 30 de les 100 funcionalitats que potencialment es poden obtindre amb la malla dissenyada composta de 7 cèl·lules hexagonals. Este fet suposa un rècord enfront dels sistemes de propòsit específic. El sistema pot aplicarse en diferents camps com les comunicacions, els sensors químics i biomèdics, el processat de senyals, la gestió i processament de xarxes i els sistemes d'informació quàntics. El conjunt del treball realitzat representa un pas important en l'evolució d'este paradigma, i assenta les bases per a una nova era de dispositius fotónicos de propòsit general.Pérez López, D. (2017). Integrated Microwave Photonic Processors using Waveguide Mesh Cores [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/91232TESI

Digital Architectures for UWB Beamforming Using 2D IIR Spatio-Temporal Frequency-Planar Filters

A design method and an FPGA-based prototype implementation of massively parallel systolic-array VLSI architectures for 2nd-order and 3rd-order frequency-planar beam plane-wave filters are proposed. Frequency-planar beamforming enables highly-directional UWB RF beams at low computational complexity compared to digital phased-array feed techniques. The array factors of the proposed realizations are simulated and both high-directional selectivity and UWB performance are demonstrated. The proposed architectures operate using 2's complement finite precision digital arithmetic. The real-time throughput is maximized using look-ahead optimization applied locally to each processor in the proposed massively-parallel realization of the filter. From sensitivity theory, it is shown that 15 and 19-bit precision for filter coefficients results in better than 3% error for 2nd- and 3rd-order beam filters. Folding together with Ktimes multiplexing is applied to the proposed beam architectures such that throughput can be traded for K-fold lower complexity for realizing the 2-D fan filter banks. Prototype FPGA circuit implementations of these filters are proposed using a Virtex 6 xc6vsx475t-2ff1759 device. The FPGA-prototyped architectures are evaluated using area (A), critical path delay (T), and metrics AT and AT2. The L2 error energy is used as a metric for evaluating fixed-point noise levels and the accuracy of the finite precision digital arithmetic circuits

Principles, fundamentals, and applications of programmable integrated photonics

[EN] Programmable integrated photonics is an emerging new paradigm that aims at designing common integrated optical hardware resource configurations, capable of implementing an unconstrained variety of functionalities by suitable programming, following a parallel but not identical path to that of integrated electronics in the past two decades of the last century. Programmable integrated photonics is raising considerable interest, as it is driven by the surge of a considerable number of new applications in the fields of telecommunications, quantum information processing, sensing, and neurophotonics, calling for flexible, reconfigurable, low-cost, compact, and low-power-consuming devices that can cooperate with integrated electronic devices to overcome the limitation expected by the demise of Moore¿s Law. Integrated photonic devices exploiting full programmability are expected to scale from application-specific photonic chips (featuring a relatively low number of functionalities) up to very complex application-agnostic complex subsystems much in the same way as field programmable gate arrays and microprocessors operate in electronics. Two main differences need to be considered. First, as opposed to integrated electronics, programmable integrated photonics will carry analog operations over the signals to be processed. Second, the scale of integration density will be several orders of magnitude smaller due to the physical limitations imposed by the wavelength ratio of electrons and light wave photons. The success of programmable integrated photonics will depend on leveraging the properties of integrated photonic devices and, in particular, on research into suitable interconnection hardware architectures that can offer a very high spatial regularity as well as the possibility of independently setting (with a very low power consumption) the interconnection state of each connecting element. Integrated multiport interferometers and waveguide meshes provide regular and periodic geometries, formed by replicating unit elements and cells, respectively. In the case of waveguide meshes, the cells can take the form of a square, hexagon, or triangle, among other configurations. Each side of the cell is formed by two integrated waveguides connected by means of a Mach¿Zehnder interferometer or a tunable directional coupler that can be operated by means of an output control signal as a crossbar switch or as a variable coupler with independent power division ratio and phase shift. In this paper, we provide the basic foundations and principles behind the construction of these complex programmable circuits. We also review some practical aspects that limit the programming and scalability of programmable integrated photonics and provide an overview of some of the most salient applications demonstrated so far.European Research Council; Conselleria d'Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; European Cooperation in Science and Technology; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme.Pérez-López, D.; Gasulla Mestre, I.; Dasmahapatra, P.; Capmany Francoy, J. (2020). Principles, fundamentals, and applications of programmable integrated photonics. Advances in Optics and Photonics. 12(3):709-786. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.387155709786123Lyke, J. C., Christodoulou, C. G., Vera, G. A., & Edwards, A. H. (2015). An Introduction to Reconfigurable Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(3), 291-317. doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2397832Kaeslin, H. (2008). Digital Integrated Circuit Design. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805172Trimberger, S. M. (2015). Three Ages of FPGAs: A Retrospective on the First Thirty Years of FPGA Technology. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(3), 318-331. doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2392104Mitola, J. (1995). The software radio architecture. IEEE Communications Magazine, 33(5), 26-38. doi:10.1109/35.393001Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014). A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1617-1634. doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180Papagianni, C., Leivadeas, A., Papavassiliou, S., Maglaris, V., Cervello-Pastor, C., & Monje, A. (2013). On the optimal allocation of virtual resources in cloud computing networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 62(6), 1060-1071. doi:10.1109/tc.2013.31Peruzzo, A., Laing, A., Politi, A., Rudolph, T., & O’Brien, J. L. (2011). Multimode quantum interference of photons in multiport integrated devices. Nature Communications, 2(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms1228Metcalf, B. J., Thomas-Peter, N., Spring, J. B., Kundys, D., Broome, M. A., Humphreys, P. C., … Walmsley, I. A. (2013). Multiphoton quantum interference in a multiport integrated photonic device. Nature Communications, 4(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms2349Miller, D. A. B. (2013). Self-aligning universal beam coupler. Optics Express, 21(5), 6360. doi:10.1364/oe.21.006360Miller, D. A. B. (2013). Self-configuring universal linear optical component [Invited]. Photonics Research, 1(1), 1. doi:10.1364/prj.1.000001Carolan, J., Harrold, C., Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., Russell, N. J., Silverstone, J. W., … Laing, A. (2015). Universal linear optics. Science, 349(6249), 711-716. doi:10.1126/science.aab3642Harris, N. C., Steinbrecher, G. R., Prabhu, M., Lahini, Y., Mower, J., Bunandar, D., … Englund, D. (2017). Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor. Nature Photonics, 11(7), 447-452. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.95Birth of the programmable optical chip. (2015). Nature Photonics, 10(1), 1-1. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.265Zhuang, L., Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Hoekman, M., Boller, K.-J., & Lowery, A. J. (2015). Programmable photonic signal processor chip for radiofrequency applications. Optica, 2(10), 854. doi:10.1364/optica.2.000854Pérez, D., Gasulla, I., Capmany, J., & Soref, R. A. (2016). Reconfigurable lattice mesh designs for programmable photonic processors. Optics Express, 24(11), 12093. doi:10.1364/oe.24.012093Capmany, J., Gasulla, I., & Pérez, D. (2015). The programmable processor. Nature Photonics, 10(1), 6-8. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.254Pérez, D., Gasulla, I., Crudgington, L., Thomson, D. J., Khokhar, A. Z., Li, K., … Capmany, J. (2017). Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nature Communications, 8(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00714-1Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walsmley, I. A. (2016). Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica, 3(12), 1460. doi:10.1364/optica.3.001460Perez, D., Gasulla, I., Fraile, F. J., Crudgington, L., Thomson, D. J., Khokhar, A. Z., … Capmany, J. (2017). Silicon Photonics Rectangular Universal Interferometer. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 11(6), 1700219. doi:10.1002/lpor.201700219Shen, Y., Harris, N. C., Skirlo, S., Prabhu, M., Baehr-Jones, T., Hochberg, M., … Soljačić, M. (2017). Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits. Nature Photonics, 11(7), 441-446. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.93Ribeiro, A., Ruocco, A., Vanacker, L., & Bogaerts, W. (2016). Demonstration of a 4 × 4-port universal linear circuit. Optica, 3(12), 1348. doi:10.1364/optica.3.001348Annoni, A., Guglielmi, E., Carminati, M., Ferrari, G., Sampietro, M., Miller, D. A., … Morichetti, F. (2017). Unscrambling light—automatically undoing strong mixing between modes. Light: Science & Applications, 6(12), e17110-e17110. doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.110Perez, D., Gasulla, I., & Capmany, J. (2018). Toward Programmable Microwave Photonics Processors. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(2), 519-532. doi:10.1109/jlt.2017.2778741Chen, L., Hall, E., Theogarajan, L., & Bowers, J. (2011). Photonic Switching for Data Center Applications. IEEE Photonics Journal, 3(5), 834-844. doi:10.1109/jphot.2011.2166994Miller, D. A. B. (2017). Meshing optics with applications. Nature Photonics, 11(7), 403-404. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.104Thomas-Peter, N., Langford, N. K., Datta, A., Zhang, L., Smith, B. J., Spring, J. B., … Walmsley, I. A. (2011). Integrated photonic sensing. New Journal of Physics, 13(5), 055024. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/055024Smit, M., Leijtens, X., Ambrosius, H., Bente, E., van der Tol, J., Smalbrugge, B., … van Veldhoven, R. (2014). An introduction to InP-based generic integration technology. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 29(8), 083001. doi:10.1088/0268-1242/29/8/083001Coldren, L. A., Nicholes, S. C., Johansson, L., Ristic, S., Guzzon, R. S., Norberg, E. J., & Krishnamachari, U. (2011). High Performance InP-Based Photonic ICs—A Tutorial. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 29(4), 554-570. doi:10.1109/jlt.2010.2100807Kish, F., Nagarajan, R., Welch, D., Evans, P., Rossi, J., Pleumeekers, J., … Joyner, C. (2013). From Visible Light-Emitting Diodes to Large-Scale III–V Photonic Integrated Circuits. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(10), 2255-2270. doi:10.1109/jproc.2013.2275018Hochberg, M., & Baehr-Jones, T. (2010). Towards fabless silicon photonics. Nature Photonics, 4(8), 492-494. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.172Bogaerts, W., Fiers, M., & Dumon, P. (2014). Design Challenges in Silicon Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 20(4), 1-8. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2013.2295882Soref, R. (2006). The Past, Present, and Future of Silicon Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 12(6), 1678-1687. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2006.883151Chrostowski, L., & Hochberg, M. (2015). Silicon Photonics Design. doi:10.1017/cbo9781316084168Heck, M. J. R., Bauters, J. F., Davenport, M. L., Doylend, J. K., Jain, S., Kurczveil, G., … Bowers, J. E. (2013). Hybrid Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuit Technology. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 19(4), 6100117-6100117. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2012.2235413Keyvaninia, S., Muneeb, M., Stanković, S., Van Veldhoven, P. J., Van Thourhout, D., & Roelkens, G. (2012). Ultra-thin DVS-BCB adhesive bonding of III-V wafers, dies and multiple dies to a patterned silicon-on-insulator substrate. Optical Materials Express, 3(1), 35. doi:10.1364/ome.3.000035Heideman, R., Hoekman, M., & Schreuder, E. (2012). TriPleX-Based Integrated Optical Ring Resonators for Lab-on-a-Chip and Environmental Detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 18(5), 1583-1596. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2012.2188382Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Zhuang, L., Taddei, C., Leinse, A., Heideman, R. G., van Dijk, P. W. L., … Boller, K.-J. (2013). Silicon nitride microwave photonic circuits. Optics Express, 21(19), 22937. doi:10.1364/oe.21.022937Corbett, B., Loi, R., Zhou, W., Liu, D., & Ma, Z. (2017). Transfer print techniques for heterogeneous integration of photonic components. Progress in Quantum Electronics, 52, 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2017.01.001Van der Tol, J. J. G. M., Jiao, Y., Shen, L., Millan-Mejia, A., Pogoretskii, V., van Engelen, J. P., & Smit, M. K. (2018). Indium Phosphide Integrated Photonics in Membranes. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 24(1), 1-9. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2017.2772786Bachmann, M., Besse, P. A., & Melchior, H. (1994). General self-imaging properties in N × N multimode interference couplers including phase relations. Applied Optics, 33(18), 3905. doi:10.1364/ao.33.003905Soldano, L. B., & Pennings, E. C. M. (1995). Optical multi-mode interference devices based on self-imaging: principles and applications. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 13(4), 615-627. doi:10.1109/50.372474Madsen, C. K., & Zhao, J. H. (1999). Optical Filter Design and Analysis. Wiley Series in Microwave and Optical Engineering. doi:10.1002/0471213756Desurvire, E. (2009). Classical and Quantum Information Theory. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803758Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001). A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature, 409(6816), 46-52. doi:10.1038/35051009Capmany, J., & Pérez, D. (2020). Programmable Integrated Photonics. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844402.001.0001Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Bentivegna, M., Brod, D. J., Crespi, A., Flamini, F., … Sciarrino, F. (2014). Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling. Nature Photonics, 8(8), 615-620. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.135Mennea, P. L., Clements, W. R., Smith, D. H., Gates, J. C., Metcalf, B. J., Bannerman, R. H. S., … Smith, P. G. R. (2018). Modular linear optical circuits. Optica, 5(9), 1087. doi:10.1364/optica.5.001087Perez-Lopez, D., Sanchez, E., & Capmany, J. (2018). Programmable True Time Delay Lines Using Integrated Waveguide Meshes. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(19), 4591-4601. doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2831008Pérez-López, D., Gutierrez, A. M., Sánchez, E., DasMahapatra, P., & Capmany, J. (2019). Integrated photonic tunable basic units using dual-drive directional couplers. Optics Express, 27(26), 38071. doi:10.1364/oe.27.038071Jinguji, K., & Kawachi, M. (1995). Synthesis of coherent two-port lattice-form optical delay-line circuit. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 13(1), 73-82. doi:10.1109/50.350643Mookherjea, S., & Yariv, A. (2002). Coupled resonator optical waveguides. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 8(3), 448-456. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2002.1016347Heebner, J. E., Chak, P., Pereira, S., Sipe, J. E., & Boyd, R. W. (2004). Distributed and localized feedback in microresonator sequences for linear and nonlinear optics. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 21(10), 1818. doi:10.1364/josab.21.001818Fandiño, J. S., Muñoz, P., Doménech, D., & Capmany, J. (2016). A monolithic integrated photonic microwave filter. Nature Photonics, 11(2), 124-129. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.233Miller, D. A. B. (2012). All linear optical devices are mode converters. Optics Express, 20(21), 23985. doi:10.1364/oe.20.023985Brown, S. D., Francis, R. J., Rose, J., & Vranesic, Z. G. (1992). Field-Programmable Gate Arrays. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3572-0Lee, E. K. F., & Gulak, P. G. (1992). Field programmable analogue array based on MOSFET transconductors. Electronics Letters, 28(1), 28-29. doi:10.1049/el:19920017Lee, E. K. F., & Gulak, P. G. (s. f.). A transconductor-based field-programmable analog array. Proceedings ISSCC ’95 - International Solid-State Circuits Conference. doi:10.1109/isscc.1995.535521Pérez, D., Gasulla, I., & Capmany, J. (2018). Field-programmable photonic arrays. Optics Express, 26(21), 27265. doi:10.1364/oe.26.027265Zheng, D., Doménech, J. D., Pan, W., Zou, X., Yan, L., & Pérez, D. (2019). Low-loss broadband 5  ×  5 non-blocking Si3N4 optical switch matrix. Optics Letters, 44(11), 2629. doi:10.1364/ol.44.002629Densmore, A., Janz, S., Ma, R., Schmid, J. H., Xu, D.-X., Delâge, A., … Cheben, P. (2009). Compact and low power thermo-optic switch using folded silicon waveguides. Optics Express, 17(13), 10457. doi:10.1364/oe.17.010457Song, M., Long, C. M., Wu, R., Seo, D., Leaird, D. E., & Weiner, A. M. (2011). Reconfigurable and Tunable Flat-Top Microwave Photonic Filters Utilizing Optical Frequency Combs. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 23(21), 1618-1620. doi:10.1109/lpt.2011.2165209Rudé, M., Pello, J., Simpson, R. E., Osmond, J., Roelkens, G., van der Tol, J. J. G. M., & Pruneri, V. (2013). Optical switching at 1.55 μm in silicon racetrack resonators using phase change materials. Applied Physics Letters, 103(14), 141119. doi:10.1063/1.4824714Zheng, J., Khanolkar, A., Xu, P., Colburn, S., Deshmukh, S., Myers, J., … Majumdar, A. (2018). GST-on-silicon hybrid nanophotonic integrated circuits: a non-volatile quasi-continuously reprogrammable platform. Optical Materials Express, 8(6), 1551. doi:10.1364/ome.8.001551Edinger, P., Errando-Herranz, C., & Gylfason, K. B. (2019). Low-Loss MEMS Phase Shifter for Large Scale Reconfigurable Silicon Photonics. 2019 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). doi:10.1109/memsys.2019.8870616Carroll, L., Lee, J.-S., Scarcella, C., Gradkowski, K., Duperron, M., Lu, H., … O’Brien, P. (2016). Photonic Packaging: Transforming Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuits into Photonic Devices. Applied Sciences, 6(12), 426. doi:10.3390/app6120426Bahadori, M., Gazman, A., Janosik, N., Rumley, S., Zhu, Z., Polster, R., … Bergman, K. (2018). Thermal Rectification of Integrated Microheaters for Microring Resonators in Silicon Photonics Platform. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(3), 773-788. doi:10.1109/jlt.2017.2781131Cocorullo, G., Della Corte, F. G., Rendina, I., & Sarro, P. M. (1998). Thermo-optic effect exploitation in silicon microstructures. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 71(1-2), 19-26. doi:10.1016/s0924-4247(98)00168-xZecevic, N., Hofbauer, M., & Zimmermann, H. (2015). Integrated Pulsewidth Modulation Control for a Scalable Optical Switch Matrix. IEEE Photonics Journal, 7(6), 1-7. doi:10.1109/jphot.2015.2506153Seok, T. J., Quack, N., Han, S., & Wu, M. C. (2015). 50×50 Digital Silicon Photonic Switches with MEMS-Actuated Adiabatic Couplers. Optical Fiber Communication Conference. doi:10.1364/ofc.2015.m2b.4Zortman, W. A., Trotter, D. C., & Watts, M. R. (2010). Silicon photonics manufacturing. Optics Express, 18(23), 23598. doi:10.1364/oe.18.023598Mower, J., Harris, N. C., Steinbrecher, G. R., Lahini, Y., & Englund, D. (2015). High-fidelity quantum state evolution in imperfect photonic integrated circuits. Physical Review A, 92(3). doi:10.1103/physreva.92.032322Pérez, D., & Capmany, J. (2019). Scalable analysis for arbitrary photonic integrated waveguide meshes. Optica, 6(1), 19. doi:10.1364/optica.6.000019Oton, C. J., Manganelli, C., Bontempi, F., Fournier, M., Fowler, D., & Kopp, C. (2016). Silicon photonic waveguide metrology using Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Optics Express, 24(6), 6265. doi:10.1364/oe.24.006265Chen, X., & Bogaerts, W. (2019). A Graph-based Design and Programming Strategy for Reconfigurable Photonic Circuits. 2019 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series (SUM). doi:10.1109/phosst.2019.8795068Zibar, D., Wymeersch, H., & Lyubomirsky, I. (2017). Machine learning under the spotlight. Nature Photonics, 11(12), 749-751. doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0058-3Lopez, D. P. (2020). Programmable Integrated Silicon Photonics Waveguide Meshes: Optimized Designs and Control Algorithms. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 26(2), 1-12. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2019.2948048Harris, N. C., Bunandar, D., Pant, M., Steinbrecher, G. R., Mower, J., Prabhu, M., … Englund, D. (2016). Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon. Nanophotonics, 5(3), 456-468. doi:10.1515/nanoph-2015-0146Spring, J. B., Metcalf, B. J., Humphreys, P. C., Kolthammer, W. S., Jin, X.-M., Barbieri, M., … Walmsley, I. A. (2012). Boson Sampling on a Photonic Chip. Science, 339(6121), 798-801. doi:10.1126/science.1231692O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009). Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photonics, 3(12), 687-695. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007). Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Reviews of Modern Physics, 79(1), 135-174. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135Politi, A., Cryan, M. J., Rarity, J. G., Yu, S., & O’Brien, J. L. (2008). Silica-on-Silicon Waveguide Quantum Circuits. Science, 320(5876), 646-649. doi:10.1126/science.1155441Politi, A., Matthews, J., Thompson, M. G., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009). Integrated Quantum Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 15(6), 1673-1684. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2009.2026060Thompson, M. G., Politi, A., Matthews, J. C. F., & O’Brien, J. L. (2011). Integrated waveguide circuits for optical quantum computing. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 5(2), 94. doi:10.1049/iet-cds.2010.0108Silverstone, J. W., Bonneau, D., O’Brien, J. L., & Thompson, M. G. (2016). Silicon Quantum Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 22(6), 390-402. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2016.2573218Poot, M., Schuck, C., Ma, X., Guo, X., & Tang, H. X. (2016). Design and characterization of integrated components for SiN photonic quantum circuits. Optics Express, 24(7), 6843. doi:10.1364/oe.24.006843Saleh, M. F., Di Giuseppe, G., Saleh, B. E. A., & Teich, M. C. (2010). Modal and polarization qubits in Ti:LiNbO_3 photonic circuits for a universal quantum logic gate. Optics Express, 18(19), 20475. doi:10.1364/oe.18.020475Harris, N. C., Carolan, J., Bunandar, D., Prabhu, M., Hochberg, M., Baehr-Jones, T., … Englund, D. (2018). Linear programmable nanophotonic processors. Optica, 5(12), 1623. doi:10.1364/optica.5.001623Qiang, X., Zhou, X., Wang, J., Wilkes, C. M., Loke, T., O’Gara, S., … Matthews, J. C. F. (2018). Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nature Photonics, 12(9), 534-539. doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0236-yLee, B. G., & Dupuis, N. (2019). Silicon Photonic Switch Fabrics: Technology and Architecture. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 37(1), 6-20. doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2876828Cheng, Q., Rumley, S., Bahadori, M., & Bergman, K. (2018). Photonic switching in high performance datacenters [Invited]. Optics Express, 26(12), 16022. doi:10.1364/oe.26.016022Wonfor, A., Wang, H., Penty, R. V., & White, I. H. (2011). Large Port Count High-Speed Optical Switch Fabric for Use Within Datacenters [Invited]. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 3(8), A32. doi:10.1364/jocn.3.000a32Hamamoto, K., Anan, T., Komatsu, K., Sugimoto, M., & Mito, I. (1992). First 8×8 semiconductor optical matrix switches using GaAs/AlGaAs electro-optic guided-wave directional couplers. Electronics Letters, 28(5), 441. doi:10.1049/el:19920278Van Campenhout, J., Green, W. M., Assefa, S., & Vlasov, Y. A. (2009). Low-power, 2×2 silicon electro-optic switch with 110-nm bandwidth for broadband reconfigurable optical networks. Optics Express, 17(26), 24020. doi:10.1364/oe.17.024020Dupuis, N., Lee, B. G., Rylyakov, A. V., Kuchta, D. M., Baks, C. W., Orcutt, J. S., … Schow, C. L. (2015). D

Software-defined universal microwave photonics processor

We propose, for the first time to our knowledge, a software-defined reconfigurable microwave photonics signal processor architecture that can be integrated on a chip and is capable of performing all the main functionalities by suitable programming of its control signals. The basic configuration is presented and a thorough end-to-end design model derived that accounts for the performance of the overall processor taking into consideration the impact and interdependencies of both its photonic and RF parts. We demonstrate the model versatility by applying it to several relevant application examples.The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support given by the Research Excellency Award Program GVA PROMETEO II/2013/012 and the FPI-UPV Ayudas de Investigacion y Desarrollo (PAID) Program from the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Pérez, D.; Gasulla Mestre, I.; Capmany Francoy, J. (2015). Software-defined universal microwave photonics processor. Optics Express. 23(11):14640-14654. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.014640S1464014654231

Programmable multifunctional integrated nanophotonics

[EN] Programmable multifunctional integrated nanophotonics (PMIN) is a new paradigm that aims at designing common integrated optical hardware configurations, which by suitable programming can implement a variety of functionalities that can be elaborated for basic or more complex operations in many application fields. The interest in PMIN is driven by the surge of a considerable number of emerging applications in the fields of telecommunications, quantum information processing, sensing and neurophotonics that will be calling for flexible, reconfigurable, low-cost, compact and low-power-consuming devices, much in the same way as how field programmable gate array (FPGA) devices operate in electronics. The success of PMIN relies on the research into suitable interconnection hardware architectures that can offer a very high spatial regularity as well as the possibility of independently setting (with a very low power consumption) the interconnection state of each connecting element. Integrated waveguide meshes provide regular and periodic geometries, formed by replicating a unit cell, which can take the form of a square, hexagon or triangle, among other configurations. Each side of the cell is formed by two integrated waveguides connected by means of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) or a tunable directional coupler that can be operated by means of an output control signal as a crossbar switch or as a variable coupler with independent power division ratio and phase shift. In this paper, we review the recent advances reported in the field of PMIN and, especially, in those based on integrated photonic waveguide meshes, both from the theoretical as well as from the experimental point of view. We pay special attention to outlining the design principles, material platforms, synthesis algorithms and practical constraints of these structures and discuss their applicability to different fields.Pérez-López, D.; Gasulla Mestre, I.; Capmany Francoy, J. (2018). Programmable multifunctional integrated nanophotonics. Nanophotonics (Online). 7(8):1351-1371. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2018-0051135113717

Programmable photonic circuits

[EN] The growing maturity of integrated photonic technology makes it possible to build increasingly large and complex photonic circuits on the surface of a chip. Today, most of these circuits are designed for a specific application, but the increase in complexity has introduced a generation of photonic circuits that can be programmed using software for a wide variety of functions through a mesh of on-chip waveguides, tunable beam couplers and optical phase shifters. Here we discuss the state of this emerging technology, including recent developments in photonic building blocks and circuit architectures, as well as electronic control and programming strategies. We cover possible applications in linear matrix operations, quantum information processing and microwave photonics, and examine how these generic chips can accelerate the development of future photonic circuits by providing a higher-level platform for prototyping novel optical functionalities without the need for custom chip fabricationBogaerts, W.; Pérez-López, D.; Capmany Francoy, J.; Miller, DAB.; Poon, J.; Englund, D.; Morichetti, F.... (2020). Programmable photonic circuits. Nature. 586(7828):207-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2764-0S2072165867828Chen, X. et al. The emergence of silicon photonics as a flexible technology platform. Proc. IEEE 106, 2101–2116 (2018).Smit, M., Williams, K. & van der Tol, J. Past, present, and future of InP-based photonic integration. APL Photonics 4, 050901 (2019).Capmany, J. & Perez, D. Programmable Integrated Photonics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020). The first book on the subject of programmable photonics gives a detailed overview of the fundamental principles, architectures and potential applications.Marpaung, D., Yao, J. & Capmany, J. Integrated microwave photonics. Nat. Photon. 13, 80–90 (2019).Zhuang, L., Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Hoekman, M., Boller, K. & Lowery, A. J. Programmable photonic signal processor chip for radiofrequency applications. Optica 2, 854–859 (2015).Shen, Y. et al. Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Photon. 11, 441–446 (2017).Harris, N. C. et al. Linear programmable nanophotonic processors. Optica 5, 1623–1631 (2018). One of the largest-scale demonstrations of a programmable photonic circuit, using a silicon photonics forward-only mesh that maps 26 input modes onto 26 output modes, for use in deep learning and quantum information processing.Miller, D. A. B. Self-configuring universal linear optical component. Photon. Res. 1, 1–15 (2013). This foundational paper in the field of programmable photonics is the first to bring together waveguide meshes with self-configuration algorithms that require no active computation, including the concept of the self-aligning beam coupler.Carolan, J. et al. Universal linear optics. Science 349, 711–716 (2015).Harris, N. C. et al. Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon. Nanophotonics 5, 456–468 (2016).Notaros, J. et al. Programmable dispersion on a photonic integrated circuit for classical and quantum applications. Opt. Express 25, 21275–21285 (2017).Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S. & Walmsley, I. A. An optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica 12, 1460–1465 (2016).Perez-Lopez, D. Programmable integrated silicon photonics waveguide meshes: optimized designs and control algorithms. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 8301312 (2020).Ribeiro, A., Ruocco, A., Vanacker, L. & Bogaerts, W. Demonstration of a 4×4-port universal linear circuit. Optica 3, 1348–1357 (2016).Harris, N. C. et al. Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor. Nat. Photon. 11, 447–452 (2017).Mennea, P. L. et al. Modular linear optical circuits. Optica 5, 1087–1090 (2018).Taballione, C. et al. 8×8 programmable quantum photonic processor based on silicon nitride waveguides. In Frontiers in Optics, JTu3A.58 (Optical Society of America, 2018). A demonstration of an 8 × 8 forward-only programmable linear circuit in silicon nitride that benefits from the notably low optical losses of this material and is therefore attractive for linear quantum operations on single photons.Perez, D. et al. Silicon photonics rectangular universal interferometer. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1700219 (2017).Xie, Y. et al. Programmable optical processor chips: toward photonic RF filters with DSP-level flexibility and MHz-band selectivity. Nanophotonics 7, 421–454 (2017). A comprehensive overview of the various ways in which a programmable photonic circuit can be used to process microwave signals, and on how this type of circuit is transitioning from custom ASPICs to generic programmable PICs.Hall, T. J. & Hasan, M. Universal discrete Fourier optics RF photonic integrated circuit architecture. Opt. Express 24, 7600–7610 (2016).Dyakonov, I. V. et al. Reconfigurable photonics on a glass chip. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044048 (2018).Shokraneh, F., Geoffroy-Gagnon, S., Nezami, M. S. & Liboiron-Ladouceur, O. A single layer neural network implemented by a 4×4 MZI-based optical processor. IEEE Photonics J. 11, 4501612 (2019).Lu, L., Zhou, L. & Chen, J. Programmable SCOW mesh silicon photonic processor for linear unitary operator. Micromachines 10, 646 (2019).Qiang, X. et al. Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nat. Photon. 12, 534–539 (2018).Wang, J. et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science 360, 285–291 (2018).Schaeff, C., Polster, R., Huber, M., Ramelow, S. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental access to higher-dimensional entangled quantum systems using integrated optics. Optica 2, 523–529 (2015).Shadbolt, P. J. et al. Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit. Nat. Photon. 6, 45–49 (2012).Miller, D. A. B. Waves, modes, communications, and optics: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics 11, 679 (2019).Miller, D. A. B. Self-aligning universal beam coupler. Opt. Express 21, 6360–6370 (2013).Miller, D. A. B. Perfect optics with imperfect components. Optica 2, 747–750 (2015).Annoni, A. et al. Unscrambling light—automatically undoing strong mixing between modes. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17110 (2017). Early demonstration of a forward-only programmable mesh used to unmix different modes in a waveguide, implementing integrated transparent detectors that measure the light intensity in the waveguide without inducing additional optical loss.Pai, S. et al. Parallel programming of an arbitrary feedforward photonic network. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 6100813 (2020).Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. & Bertani, P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 58–61 (1994).Wang, M., Alves, A. R., Xing, Y. & Bogaerts, W. Tolerant, broadband tunable 2×2 coupler circuit. Opt. Express 28, 5555–5566 (2020).Pérez-López, D., Gutierrez, A. M., Sánchez, E., DasMahapatra, P. & Capmany, J. Integrated photonic tunable basic units using dual-drive directional couplers. Opt. Express 27, 38071 (2019).Choutagunta, K., Roberts, I., Miller, D. A. B. & Kahn, J. M. Adapting Mach–Zehnder mesh equalizers in direct-detection mode-division-multiplexed links. J. Light. Technol. 38, 723–735 (2020).Miller, D. A. B. Analyzing and generating multimode optical fields using self-configuring networks. Optica 7, 794–801 (2020).Morizur, J.-F. et al. Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 2524 (2010).Labroille, G. et al. Efficient and mode selective spatial mode multiplexer based on multi-plane light conversion. Opt. Express 22, 15599–15607 (2014).Tanomura, R., Tang, R., Ghosh, S., Tanemura, T. & Nakano, T. Robust integrated optical unitary converter using multiport directional couplers. J. Light. Technol. 38, 60–66 (2020).Miller, D. A. B. Setting up meshes of interferometers – reversed local light interference method. Opt. Express 25, 29233 (2017).Li, H. W. et al. Calibration and high fidelity measurement of a quantum photonic chip. New J. Phys. 15, 063017 (2013).Cong, G. et al. Arbitrary reconfiguration of universal silicon photonic circuits by bacteria foraging algorithm to achieve reconfigurable photonic digital-to-analog conversion. Opt. Express 27, 24914 (2019).Pérez, D. et al. Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–9 (2017). The first experimental demonstration of a recirculating waveguide mesh with seven unit cells that can be programmed to perform more than a hundred different functions.Pérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Field-programmable photonic arrays. Opt. Express 26, 27265 (2018).Rahim, A., Spuesens, T., Baets, R. & Bogaerts, W. Open-access silicon photonics: current status and emerging initiatives. Proc. IEEE 106, 2313–2330 (2018).Munoz, P. et al. Foundry developments toward silicon nitride photonics from visible to the mid-infrared. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 8200513 (2019).Teng, M. et al. Miniaturized silicon photonics devices for integrated optical signal processors. J. Light. Technol. 38, 6–17 (2020).Sacher, W. D. et al. Monolithically integrated multilayer silicon nitride-on-silicon waveguide platforms for 3-D photonic circuits and devices. Proc. IEEE 106, 2232–2245 (2018).Baudot, C. et al. Developments in 300mm silicon photonics using traditional CMOS fabrication methods and materials. In 2017 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting, 765–768 (IEEE, 2017).Fahrenkopf, N. M. et al. The AIM photonics MPW: a highly accessible cutting edge technology for rapid prototyping of photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 8201406 (2019).Chiles, J. et al. Multi-planar amorphous silicon photonics with compact interplanar couplers, cross talk mitigation, and low crossing loss. APL Photonics 2, 116101 (2017).Van Campenhout, J., Green, W. M. J., Assefa, S. & Vlasov, Y. A. Integrated NiSi waveguide heaters for CMOS-compatible silicon thermo-optic devices. Opt. Lett. 35, 1013–1015 (2010).Masood, A. et al. Comparison of heater architectures for thermal control of silicon photonic circuits. In Proc. 10th Int. Conference on Group IV Photonics 83–84 (IEEE, 2013).Milanizadeh, M., Aguiar, D., Melloni, A. & Morichetti, F. Canceling thermal cross-talk effects in photonic integrated circuits. J. Light. Technol. 37, 1325–1332 (2019).Soref, R. A. & Bennett, B. R. Electrooptical effects in silicon. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23, 123–129 (1987).Reed, G. T., Mashanovich, G., Gardes, F. Y. & Thomson, D. J. Silicon optical modulators. Nat. Photon. 4, 518–526 (2010); corrigendum 4, 660 (2010).Memon, F. A. et al. Silicon oxycarbide platform for integrated photonics. J. Light. Technol. 38, 784–791 (2020).Jin, W., Polcawich, R. G., Morton, P. A. & Bowers, J. E. Piezoelectrically tuned silicon nitride ring resonator. Opt. Express 26, 3174–3187 (2018).Hosseini, N. et al. Stress-optic modulator in TriPleX platform using a piezoelectric lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin film. Opt. Express 23, 14018 (2015).De Cort, W., Beeckman, J., Claes, T., Neyts, K. & Baets, R. Wide tuning of silicon-on-insulator ring resonators with a liquid crystal cladding. Opt. Lett. 36, 3876–3878 (2011).Xing, Y. et al. Digitally controlled phase shifter using an SOI slot waveguide with liquid crystal infiltration. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27, 1269–1272 (2015).Abel, S. et al. Large Pockels effect in micro- and nanostructured barium titanate integrated on silicon. Nat. Mater. 18, 42–47 (2019).Desiatov, B., Shams-Ansari, A., Zhang, M., Wang, C. & Lončar, M. Ultra-low-loss integrated visible photonics using thin-film lithium niobate. Optica 6, 380 (2019).Alexander, K. et al. Nanophotonic Pockels modulators on a silicon nitride platform. Nat. Commun. 9, 3444 (2018).Leuthold, J. et al. Silicon-organic hybrid electro-optical devices. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19, 114–126 (2013).Errando-Herranz, C. et al. MEMS for photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 8200916 (2020).Quack, N. et al. MEMS-enabled silicon photonic integrated devices and circuits. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 56, 8400210 (2020).Hoessbacher, C. et al. The plasmonic memristor: a latching optical switch. Optica 1, 198 (2014).Ríos, C. et al. Integrated all-photonic non-volatile multi-level memory. Nat. Photon. 9, 725–732 (2015).Wuttig, M., Bhaskaran, H. & Taubner, T. Phase-change materials for non-volatile photonic applications. Nat. Photon. 11, 465–476 (2017).Morichetti, F. et al. Non-invasive on-chip light observation by contactless waveguide conductivity monitoring. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 292–301 (2014).Jayatilleka, H., Shoman, H., Chrostowski, L. & Shekhar, S. Photoconductive heaters enable control of large-scale silicon photonic ring resonator circuits. Optica 6, 84–91 (2019).Grillanda, S. et al. Non-invasive monitoring and control in silicon photonics using CMOS integrated electronics. Optica 1, 129 (2014).Annoni, A. et al. Automated routing and control of silicon photonic switch fabrics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 169–176 (2016).Dumais, P. et al. Silicon photonic switch subsystem with 900 monolithically integrated calibration photodiodes and 64-fiber package. J. Light. Technol. 36, 233–238 (2018).Chen, H., Luo, X. & Poon, A. W. Cavity-enhanced photocurrent generation by 1.55 μm wavelengths linear absorption in a p–i–n diode embedded silicon microring resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 171111 (2009).Ribeiro, A. & Bogaerts, W. Digitally controlled multiplexed silicon photonics phase shifter using heaters with integrated diodes. Opt. Express 25, 29778 (2017).Zimmermann, L. et al. BiCMOS silicon photonics platform. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference Th4E-5 (Optical Society of America, 2015).Orcutt, J. S. et al. Nanophotonic integration in state-of-the-art CMOS foundries. Opt. Express 19, 2335–2346 (2011).Stojanović, V. et al. Monolithic silicon-photonic platforms in state-of-the-art CMOS SOI processes. Opt. Express 26, 13106 (2018).Carroll, L. et al. Photonic packaging: transforming silicon photonic integrated circuits into photonic devices. Appl. Sci. 6, 426 (2016).Patterson, D., De Sousa, I. & Archard, L.-M. The future of packaging with silicon photonics. Chip Scale Rev. 21, 1–10 (2017).Ribeiro, A., Declercq, S., Khan, U., Wang, M. & Van Iseghem, L. Column-row addressing of thermo-optic phase shifters for controlling large silicon photonic circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 6100708 (2020).Pantouvaki, M. et al. Active components for 50 Gb/s NRZ-OOK optical interconnects in a silicon photonics platform. J. Light. Technol. 35, 631–638 (2017).Chen, H. et al. 100-Gbps RZ data reception in 67-GHz Si-contacted germanium waveguide p-i-n photodetectors. J. Light. Technol. 35, 722–726 (2017).Pérez, D., Gasulla, I. & Capmany, J. Toward programmable microwave photonics processors. J. Light. Technol. 36, 519–532 (2018).Zoldak, M., Halmo, L., Turkiewicz, J. P., Schumann, S. & Henker, R. Packaging of ultra-high speed optical fiber data interconnects. In Opt. Fibers and Their Applications 2017 10325, 103250R (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2017).Willner, A. E., Khaleghi, S., Chitgarha, M. R. & Yilmaz, O. F. All-optical signal processing. J. Light. Technol. 32, 660–680 (2014).Ramirez, J. M. et al. III–V-on-silicon integration: from hybrid devices to heterogeneous photonic integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 6100213 (2020).Liu, A. Y. & Bowers, J. Photonic integration with epitaxial III–V on silicon. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 6000412 (2018).Zhang, J. et al. Transfer-printing-based integration of a III–V-on-silicon distributed feedback laser. Opt. Express 26, 8821–8830 (2018).Thiessen, T. et al. Back-side-on-BOX heterogeneously integrated III–V-on-silicon O-band distributed feedback lasers. J. Light. Technol. 38, 3000–3006 (2020).López, A., Perez, D., DasMahapatra, P. & Capmany, J. Auto-routing algorithm for field-programmable photonic gate arrays. Opt. Express 28, 737–752 (2020).Chen, X., Stroobant, P., Pickavet, M. & Bogaerts, W. Graph representations for programmable photonic circuits. J. Light. Technol. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9056549 (2020).Zand, I. & Bogaerts, W. Effects of coupling and phase imperfections in programmable photonic hexagonal waveguide meshes. Photon. Res. 8, 211–218 (2020).Bogaerts, W. & Rahim, A. Programmable photonics: an opportunity for an accessible large-volume PIC ecosystem. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 1–17 (2020). A simple techno-economic analysis of how general-purpose programmable photonic circuits can reduce the cost of prototyping photonics applications.Dubrovsky, M., Ball, M. & Penkovsky, B. Optical proof of work. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.05193 (2019).Paquot, Y., Schroeder, J., Pelusi, M. D. & Eggleton, B. J. All-optical hash code generation and verification for low latency communications. Opt. Express 21, 23873 (2013).Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 14, 273–284 (2019).Norberg, E. J., Guzzon, R. S., Parker, J. S., Johansson, L. A. & Coldren, L. A. Programmable photonic microwave filters monolithically integrated in InP-InGaAsP. J. Light. Technol. 29, 1611–1619 (2011).Wang, J. et al. Reconfigurable radio-frequency arbitrary waveforms synthesized in a silicon photonic chip. Nat. Commun. 6, 5957 (2015).Burla, M. et al. On-chip CMOS compatible reconfigurable optical delay line with separate carrier tuning for microwave photonic signal processing. Opt. Express 19, 21475 (2011).Liu, L. et al. Photonic measurement of microwave frequency using a silicon microdisk resonator. Opt. Commun. 335, 266–270 (2015).Perez-Lopez, D., Sanchez, E. & Capmany, J. Programmable true-time delay lines using integrated waveguide meshes. J. Light. Technol. 36, 4591–4601 2018.Novak, D. et al. Radio-over-fiber technologies for emerging wireless systems. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 52, 0600311 (2016).Behroozpour, B., Sandborn, P. A. M., Wu, M. C. & Boser, B. E. Lidar system architectures and circuits. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 135–142 (2017).Heck, M. J. R. Highly integrated optical phased arrays: photonic integrated circuits for optical beam shaping and beam steering. Nanophotonics 6, 93–107 (2017).Van Acoleyen, K. Efficient light collection and direction-of-arrival estimation using a photonic integrated circuit. Photonics 24, 933–935 (2012).Miller, D. A. B. Establishing optimal wave communication channels automatically. J. Light. Technol. 31, 3987–3994 (2013).Luan, E., Shoman, H., Ratner, D. M., Cheung, K. C. & Chrostowski, L. Silicon photonic biosensors using label-free detection. Sensors 18, 3519 (2018).Subramanian, A. Z. et al. Silicon and silicon nitride photonic circuits for spectroscopic sensing on-a-chip. Photon. Res. 3, B47–B59 (2015).Li, Y. et al. Six-beam homodyne laser Doppler vibrometry based on silicon photonics technology. Opt. Express 26, 3638 (2018).Trimberger, S. M. Three ages of FPGAs: a retrospective on the first thirty years of FPGA technology. Proc. IEEE 103, 318–331 (2015).Mohomed, I. & Dutta, P. The age of DIY and dawn of the maker movement. Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 18, 41–43 (2015).Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 7, 79 (2018).Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).Biamonte, J. et al. Quantum machine learning. Nature 549, 195–202 (2017).Steinbrecher, G. R., Olson, J. P., Englund, D. & Carolan, J. Quantum optical neural networks. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 60 (2019).Miatto, F. M., Epping, M. & Lütkenhaus, N. Hamiltonians for one-way quantum repeaters. Quantum 2, 75 (2018)

Algorithm-Architecture Co-Design for Digital Front-Ends in Mobile Receivers

The methodology behind this work has been to use the concept of algorithm-hardware co-design to achieve efficient solutions related to the digital front-end in mobile receivers. It has been shown that, by looking at algorithms and hardware architectures together, more efficient solutions can be found; i.e., efficient with respect to some design measure. In this thesis the main focus have been placed on two such parameters; first reduced complexity algorithms to lower energy consumptions at limited performance degradation, secondly to handle the increasing number of wireless standards that preferably should run on the same hardware platform. To be able to perform this task it is crucial to understand both sides of the table, i.e., both algorithms and concepts for wireless communication as well as the implications arising on the hardware architecture. It is easier to handle the high complexity by separating those disciplines in a way of layered abstraction. However, this representation is imperfect, since many interconnected "details" belonging to different layers are lost in the attempt of handling the complexity. This results in poor implementations and the design of mobile terminals is no exception. Wireless communication standards are often designed based on mathematical algorithms with theoretical boundaries, with few considerations to actual implementation constraints such as, energy consumption, silicon area, etc. This thesis does not try to remove the layer abstraction model, given its undeniable advantages, but rather uses those cross-layer "details" that went missing during the abstraction. This is done in three manners: In the first part, the cross-layer optimization is carried out from the algorithm perspective. Important circuit design parameters, such as quantization are taken into consideration when designing the algorithm for OFDM symbol timing, CFO, and SNR estimation with a single bit, namely, the Sign-Bit. Proof-of-concept circuits were fabricated and showed high potential for low-end receivers. In the second part, the cross-layer optimization is accomplished from the opposite side, i.e., the hardware-architectural side. A SDR architecture is known for its flexibility and scalability over many applications. In this work a filtering application is mapped into software instructions in the SDR architecture in order to make filtering-specific modules redundant, and thus, save silicon area. In the third and last part, the optimization is done from an intermediate point within the algorithm-architecture spectrum. Here, a heterogeneous architecture with a combination of highly efficient and highly flexible modules is used to accomplish initial synchronization in at least two concurrent OFDM standards. A demonstrator was build capable of performing synchronization in any two standards, including LTE, WiFi, and DVB-H