Z Unification Tools in Generic Formaliser

We describe some prototype tools for performing unification (i.e. deriving the least common refinement) of simple Z specifications. The techniques used are those described in http://alethea.ukc.ac.uk/Dept/Computing/Research/NDS/consistency/cccfpsiZ.html on viewpoint specification in Z; the tools have been implemented in Generic http://public.logica.com/formaliser (a product of Logica UK Limited). UKC Computing Laboratory technical report 10-97. The prototype tools themselves (in the form of Generic Formaliser grammars) will be made available later

Which Classes of Origin Graphs Are Generated by Transducers.

We study various models of transducers equipped with origin information. We consider the semantics of these models as particular graphs, called origin graphs, and we characterise the families of such graphs recognised by streaming string transducers

A proposed translator writing system language - Computer project, volume 3, no. 1

Programming language for advanced translator writing syste

The formal power of one-visit attribute grammars

An attribute grammar is one-visit if the attributes can be evaluated by walking through the derivation tree in such a way that each subtree is visited at most once. One-visit (1V) attribute grammars are compared with one-pass left-to-right (L) attribute grammars and with attribute grammars having only one synthesized attribute (1S).\ud \ud Every 1S attribute grammar can be made one-visit. One-visit attribute grammars are simply permutations of L attribute grammars; thus the classes of output sets of 1V and L attribute grammars coincide, and similarly for 1S and L-1S attribute grammars. In case all attribute values are trees, the translation realized by a 1V attribute grammar is the composition of the translation realized by a 1S attribute grammar with a deterministic top-down tree transduction, and vice versa; thus, using a result of Duske e.a., the class of output languages of 1V (or L) attribute grammars is the image of the class of IO macro tree languages under all deterministic top-down tree transductions

Transducers from Rewrite Rules with Backreferences

Context sensitive rewrite rules have been widely used in several areas of natural language processing, including syntax, morphology, phonology and speech processing. Kaplan and Kay, Karttunen, and Mohri & Sproat have given various algorithms to compile such rewrite rules into finite-state transducers. The present paper extends this work by allowing a limited form of backreferencing in such rules. The explicit use of backreferencing leads to more elegant and general solutions.Comment: 8 pages, EACL 1999 Berge

Regular and First Order List Functions

We define two classes of functions, called regular (respectively, first-order) list functions, which manipulate objects such as lists, lists of lists, pairs of lists, lists of pairs of lists, etc. The definition is in the style of regular expressions: the functions are constructed by starting with some basic functions (e.g. projections from pairs, or head and tail operations on lists) and putting them together using four combinators (most importantly, composition of functions). Our main results are that first-order list functions are exactly the same as first-order transductions, under a suitable encoding of the inputs; and the regular list functions are exactly the same as MSO-transductions

On the relationship between the LL(k) and LR(k) grammars

In the literature various proofs of the inclusion of the class of LL(k) grammars into the class of LR(k) grammars can be found. Some of these proofs are not correct, others are informal, semi-formal or contain flaws. Some of them are correct but the proof is less straightforward than demonstrated here