3 research outputs found

    Degraded Synergistic Recruitment of sEMG Oscillations for Cerebral Palsy Infants Crawling

    Get PDF
    Background: Synergistic recruitment of muscular activities is a generally accepted mechanism for motor function control, and motor dysfunction, such as cerebral palsy (CP), destroyed the synergistic electromyography activities of muscle group for limb movement. However, very little is known how motor dysfunction of CP affects the organization of the myoelectric frequency components due to the abnormal motor unit recruiting patterns.Objectives: Exploring whether the myoelectric activity can be represented with synergistic recruitment of surface electromyography (sEMG) frequency components; evaluating the effect of CP motor dysfunction on the synergistic recruitment of sEMG oscillations.Methods: Twelve CP infants and 17 typically developed (TD) infants are recruited for self-paced crawling on hands and knees. sEMG signals have been recorded from bilateral biceps brachii (BB) and triceps brachii (TB) muscles. Multi-scale oscillations are extracted via multivariate empirical mode decomposition (MEMD), and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) method is employed to obtain synergistic pattern of these sEMG oscillations. The coefficient curve of sEMG oscillation synergies are adopted to quantify the time-varying recruitment of BB and TB myoelectric activity during infants crawling.Results: Three patterns of sEMG oscillation synergies with specific frequency ranges are extracted in BB and TB of CP or TD infants. The contribution of low-frequency oscillation synergy of BB in CP group is significantly less than that in TD group (p < 0.05) during forward swing phase for slow contraction; however, this low-frequency oscillation synergy keep higher level during the backward swing phase crawling. For the myoelectric activities of TB, there is not enough high-frequency oscillation recruitment of sEMG for the fast contraction in propulsive phase of CP infants crawling.Conclusion: Our results reveal that, the myoelectric activities of a muscle can be manifested as sEMG oscillation synergies, and motor dysfunction of CP degrade the synergistic recruitment of sEMG oscillations due to the impaired CNS regulation and destroyed MU/muscle fiber. Our preliminary work suggests that time-varying coefficient curve of sEMG oscillation synergies is a potential index to evaluate the abnormal recruitment of electromyography activities affected by CP disorders

    A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Incidence of Injury in Professional Female Soccer

    Get PDF
    The epidemiology of injury in male professional football is well documented and has been used as a basis to monitor injury trends and implement injury prevention strategies. There are no systematic reviews that have investigated injury incidence in women’s professional football. Therefore, the extent of injury burden in women’s professional football remains unknown. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to calculate an overall incidence rate of injury in senior female professional soccer. The secondary aims were to provide an incidence rate for training and match play. METHODS: PubMed, Discover, EBSCO, Embase and ScienceDirect electronic databases were searched from inception to September 2018. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement using a 22-item STROBE checklist. Seven prospective studies (n=1137 professional players) were combined in a pooled analysis of injury incidence using a mixed effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Cochrane Q statistic and I2. RESULTS: The epidemiological incidence proportion over one season was 0.62 (95% CI 0.59 - 0.64). Mean total incidence of injury was 3.15 (95% CI 1.54 - 4.75) injuries per 1000 hours. The mean incidence of injury during match play was 10.72 (95% CI 9.11 - 12.33) and during training was 2.21 (95% CI 0.96 - 3.45). Data analysis found a significant level of heterogeneity (total Incidence, X2 = 16.57 P < 0.05; I2 = 63.8%) and during subsequent sub group analyses in those studies reviewed (match incidence, X2 = 76.4 (d.f. = 7), P <0.05; I2 = 90.8%, training incidence, X2 = 16.97 (d.f. = 7), P < 0.05; I2 = 58.8%). Appraisal of the study methodologies revealed inconsistency in the use of injury terminology, data collection procedures and calculation of exposure by researchers. Such inconsistencies likely contribute to the large variance in the incidence and prevalence of injury reported. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated risk of sustaining at least one injury over one football season is 62%. Continued reporting of heterogeneous results in population samples limits meaningful comparison of studies. Standardising the criteria used to attribute injury and activity coupled with more accurate methods of calculating exposure will overcome such limitations
    corecore