LSI/VLSI design for testability analysis and general approach

The incorporation of testability characteristics into large scale digital design is not only necessary for, but also pertinent to effective device testing and enhancement of device reliability. There are at least three major DFT techniques, namely, the self checking, the LSSD, and the partitioning techniques, each of which can be incorporated into a logic design to achieve a specific set of testability and reliability requirements. Detailed analysis of the design theory, implementation, fault coverage, hardware requirements, application limitations, etc., of each of these techniques are also presented

Balance testing and balance-testable design of logic circuits

We propose a low-cost method for testing logic circuits, termed balance testing, which is particularly suited to built-in self testing. Conceptually related to ones counting and syndrome testing, it detects faults by checking the difference between the number of ones and the number of zeros in the test response sequence. A key advantage of balance testing is that the testability of various fault types can be easily analyzed. We present a novel analysis technique which leads to necessary and sufficient conditions for the balance testability of the standard single stuck-line (SSL) faults. This analysis can be easily extended to multiple stuck-line and bridging faults. Balance testing also forms the basis for design for balance testability (DFBT), a systematic DFT technique that achieves full coverage of SSL faults. It places the unit under test in a low-cost framework circuit that guarantees complete balance testability. Unlike most existing DFT techniques, DFBT requires only one additional control input and no redesign of the underlying circuit is necessary. We present experimental results on applying balance testing to the ISCAS 85 benchmark circuits, which show that very high fault coverage is obtained for large circuits even with reduced deterministic test sets. This coverage can always be made 100% either by adding tests or applying DFBT.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43016/1/10836_2004_Article_BF00136077.pd

Test schedules for VLSI circuits having built-in test hardware

AbstractNumerous built-in test techniques exist for testing structures within a VLSI chip. In general these techniques deal with a repeated application of the following steps: (1) generate a test vector; (2) transmit it to the structure being tested; (3) process the test through the structure; (4) obtain the response from the structure; and (5) process the response. These steps constitute a test schema. Because these steps must be repeated for each test vector, it is possible that steps in processing one test vector can overlap those used in processing another vector. The manner of overlapping this testing process leads to the concept of a test schedule. In this paper we first present a model for built-in test techniques and for describing test schemas and schedules. We introduce the new concept of an I-path which is used to transfer data from one place in a circuit to another, without modifying the data. Finally results are presented describing how to create test schedules that minimizes the total testing time. Lower bounds on the minimal test time are also derived

Testing and Structured Design

This paper describes part of an integrated circuit testing project carried out at Caltech between 1979 and 1982. The central theme and result of the project is a language or notation for describing tests for complex integrated circuits. The evolution of this test language has been guided by many considerations, including (1) its implementation in a working, interactive test system called FIFI, (2) its fit to ideas about the architecture of high-performance test instruments, and (3) its expressivity for a design-for-testability strategy for chip designs structured in the general style presented by Mead and Conway [1]

Structural Software-Based Self-Test of Network-on-Chip

Abstract—Software-Based Self-Test (SBST) is extended to the switches of complex Network-on-Chips (NoC). Test patterns for structural faults are turned into valid packets by using satisfiability (SAT) solvers. The test technique provides a high fault coverage for both manufacturing test and online test

A timing-driven pseudo-exhaustive testing of VLSI circuits

[[abstract]]The object of this paper is to reduce the delay penalty of bypass storage cell (bsc) insertion for pseudo-exhaustive testing. We first propose a tight delay lower bound algorithm which estimates the minimum circuit delay for each node after bsc insertion. By understanding how the lower bound algorithm loses optimality, we can propose a bsc insertion heuristic which tries to insert bscs so that the final delay is as close to the lower bound as possible. Our experiments show that the results of our heuristic are either optimal because they are the same as the delay lower bounds or they are very close to the optimal solutions.[[conferencetype]]國際[[conferencedate]]20000528~20000531[[booktype]]紙本[[conferencelocation]]Geneva, Switzerlan

Design of On-Chip Self-Testing Signature Register

Over the last few years, scan test has turn out to be too expensive to implement for industry standard designs due to increasing test data volume and test time. The test cost of a chip is mainly governed by the resource utilization of Automatic Test Equipment (ATE). Also, it directly depends upon test time that includes time required to load test program, to apply test vectors and to analyze generated test response of the chip. An issue of test time and data volume is increasingly appealing designers to use on-chip test data compactors, either on input side or output side or both. Such techniques significantly address the former issues but have little hold over increasing number of input-outputs under test mode. Further, test pins on DUT are increasing over the generations. Thus, scan channels on test floor are falling short in number for placement of such ICs. To address issues discussed above, we introduce an on-chip self-testing signature register. It comprises a response compactor and a comparator. The compactor compacts large chunk of response data to a small test signature whereas the comparator compares this test signature with desired one. The overall test result for the design is generated on single output pin. Being no storage of test response is demanded, the considerable reduction in ATE memory can be observed. Also, with only single pin to be monitored for test result, the number of tester channels and compare edges on ATE side significantly reduce at the end of the test. This cuts down maintenance and usage cost of test floor and increases its life time. Furthermore reduction in test pins gives scope for DFT engineers to increase number of scan chains so as to further reduce test time