CONJURE: automatic generation of constraint models from problem specifications

Funding: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/V027182/1, EP/P015638/1), Royal Society (URF/R/180015).When solving a combinatorial problem, the formulation or model of the problem is critical tothe efficiency of the solver. Automating the modelling process has long been of interest because of the expertise and time required to produce an effective model of a given problem. We describe a method to automatically produce constraint models from a problem specification written in the abstract constraint specification language Essence. Our approach is to incrementally refine the specification into a concrete model by applying a chosen refinement rule at each step. Any nontrivial specification may be refined in multiple ways, creating a space of models to choose from. The handling of symmetries is a particularly important aspect of automated modelling. Many combinatorial optimisation problems contain symmetry, which can lead to redundant search. If a partial assignment is shown to be invalid, we are wasting time if we ever consider a symmetric equivalent of it. A particularly important class of symmetries are those introduced by the constraint modelling process: modelling symmetries. We show how modelling symmetries may be broken automatically as they enter a model during refinement, obviating the need for an expensive symmetry detection step following model formulation. Our approach is implemented in a system called Conjure. We compare the models producedby Conjure to constraint models from the literature that are known to be effective. Our empirical results confirm that Conjure can reproduce successfully the kernels of the constraint models of 42 benchmark problems found in the literature.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Constraint-based specifications for system configuration

Declarative, object-oriented configuration management systems are widely used, and there is a desire to extend such systems with automated analysis and decision-making. This thesis introduces a new formulation for configuration management problems based on the tools and techniques of constraint programming, which enables automated decision-making. We present ConfSolve, an object-oriented declarative configuration language, in which logical constraints on a system can be specified. Verification, impact analysis, and the generation of valid configurations can then be performed. This is achieved via translation to the MiniZinc constraint programming language, which is in turn solved via the Gecode constraint solver. We formally define the syntax, type system, and semantics of ConfSolve, in order to provide it with a rigorous foundation. Additionally we show that our implementation outperforms previous work, which utilised an SMT solver, while adding new features such as optimisation. We next develop an extension of the ConfSolve language, which facilitates not only one-off configuration tasks, but also subsequent re-configurations in which the previous state of the system is taken into account. In a practical setting one does not wish for a re-configuration to deviate too far from the existing state, unless the benefits are substantial. Re-configuration is of crucial importance if automated configuration systems are to gain industry adoption. We present a novel approach to incorporating state-change into ConfSolve while remaining declarative and providing acceptable performance

Theory Learning with Symmetry Breaking

This paper investigates the use of a Prolog coded SMT solver in tackling a well known constraints problem, namely packing a given set of consecutive squares into a given rectangle, and details the developments in the solver that this motivates. The packing problem has a natural model in the theory of quantifier-free integer difference logic, a theory supported by many SMT solvers. The solver used in this work exploits a data structure consisting of an incremental Floyd-Warshall matrix paired with a watch matrix that monitors the entailment status of integer difference constraints. It is shown how this structure can be used to build unsatisfiable theory cores on the fly, which in turn allows theory learning to be incorporated into the solver. Further, it is shown that a problem-specific and non-standard approach to learning can be taken where symmetry breaking is incorporated into the learning stage, magnifying the effect of learning. It is argued that the declarative framework allows the solver to be used in this white box manner and is a strength of the solver. The approach is experimentally evaluated

Extensible Automated Constraint Modelling

In constraint solving, a critical bottleneck is the formulationof an effective constraint model of a given problem. The CONJURE system described in this paper, a substantial step forward over prototype versions of CONJURE previously reported, makes a valuable contribution to the automation of constraint modelling by automatically producing constraint models from their specifications in the abstract constraint specification language ESSENCE. A set of rules is used to refine an abstract specification into a concrete constraint model. We demonstrate that this set of rules is readily extensible to increase the space of possible constraint models CONJURE can produce. Our empirical results confirm that CONJURE can reproduce successfully the kernels of the constraint models of 32 benchmark problems found in the literature

Towards portfolios of streamlined constraint models : a case study with the balanced academic curriculum problem

Funding: This work is supported by EPSRC grant EP/P015638/1 and used the Cirrus UK National Tier-2 HPC Service at EPCC (http://www.cirrus.ac.uk) funded by the University of Edinburgh and EPSRC (EP/P020267/1). Nguyen Dang is a Leverhulme Early Career Fellow.Augmenting a base constraint model with additional constraints can strengthen the inferences made by a solver and therefore reduce search effort. We focus on the automatic addition of streamliner constraints, derived from the types present in an abstract Essence specification of a problem class of interest, which trade completeness for potentially very significant reduction in search. The refinement of streamlined Essence specifications into constraint models suitable for input to constraint solvers gives rise to a large number of modelling choices in addition to those required for the base Essence specification. Previous automated streamlining approaches have been limited in evaluating only a single default model for each streamlined specification. In this paper we explore the effect of model selection in the context of streamlined specifications. We propose a new best-first search method that generates a portfolio of Pareto Optimal streamliner-model combinations by evaluating for each streamliner a portfolio of models to search and explore the variability in performance and find the optimal model. Various forms of racing are utilised to constrain the computational cost of training.Publisher PD