41,337 research outputs found
Survey on Challenges of Question Answering in the Semantic Web
Höffner K, Walter S, Marx E, Usbeck R, Lehmann J, Ngomo A-CN. Survey on Challenges of Question Answering in the Semantic Web. Semantic Web Journal. 2017;8(6):895-920
Ontology selection: ontology evaluation on the real Semantic Web
The increasing number of ontologies on the Web and the appearance of large scale ontology repositories has brought the topic of ontology selection in the focus of the semantic web research agenda. Our view is that ontology evaluation is core to ontology selection and that, because ontology selection is performed in an open Web environment, it brings new challenges to ontology evaluation.
Unfortunately, current research regards ontology selection and evaluation as two separate topics. Our goal in this paper is to explore how these two tasks relate. In particular, we are interested to get a better understanding of the ontology selection task and filter out the challenges that it brings to ontology evaluation. We discuss requirements posed by the open Web environment on ontology selection, we overview existing work on selection and point out future directions. Our major conclusion is that, even if selection methods still need further development, they have already brought novel approaches to ontology evaluatio
A Factoid Question Answering System for Vietnamese
In this paper, we describe the development of an end-to-end factoid question
answering system for the Vietnamese language. This system combines both
statistical models and ontology-based methods in a chain of processing modules
to provide high-quality mappings from natural language text to entities. We
present the challenges in the development of such an intelligent user interface
for an isolating language like Vietnamese and show that techniques developed
for inflectional languages cannot be applied "as is". Our question answering
system can answer a wide range of general knowledge questions with promising
accuracy on a test set.Comment: In the proceedings of the HQA'18 workshop, The Web Conference
Companion, Lyon, Franc
A Survey of Paraphrasing and Textual Entailment Methods
Paraphrasing methods recognize, generate, or extract phrases, sentences, or
longer natural language expressions that convey almost the same information.
Textual entailment methods, on the other hand, recognize, generate, or extract
pairs of natural language expressions, such that a human who reads (and trusts)
the first element of a pair would most likely infer that the other element is
also true. Paraphrasing can be seen as bidirectional textual entailment and
methods from the two areas are often similar. Both kinds of methods are useful,
at least in principle, in a wide range of natural language processing
applications, including question answering, summarization, text generation, and
machine translation. We summarize key ideas from the two areas by considering
in turn recognition, generation, and extraction methods, also pointing to
prominent articles and resources.Comment: Technical Report, Natural Language Processing Group, Department of
Informatics, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece, 201
- …