677 research outputs found

    Product set growth in mapping class groups

    Full text link
    We study product set growth in groups with acylindrical actions on quasi-trees and hyperbolic spaces. As a consequence, we show that for every surface SS of finite type, there exist α,β>0\alpha,\beta>0 such that for any finite symmetric subset UU of the mapping class group MCG(S)MCG(S) we have ∣U∣⩾(α∣U∣)βn|U|\geqslant (\alpha|U|)^{\beta n}, so long as ⟨U⟩\langle U\rangle is not contained non-trivially in a direct product with a virtually free abelian factor. This result for mapping class groups also applies to all of their subgroups, including right-angled Artin groups. We separately prove that we can quickly generate loxodromic elements in right-angled Artin groups, which by a result of Fujiwara shows that the set of growth rates for many of their subgroups are well-ordered.Comment: 48 pages, 1 figure. This is a significant rewrite of an earlier paper on right-angled Artin groups, which now includes new results about mapping class group

    Normal subgroups of mapping class groups and the metaconjecture of Ivanov

    Get PDF
    We prove that if a normal subgroup of the extended mapping class group of a closed surface has an element of sufficiently small support then its automorphism group and abstract commensurator group are both isomorphic to the extended mapping class group. The proof relies on another theorem we prove, which states that many simplicial complexes associated to a closed surface have automorphism group isomorphic to the extended mapping class group. These results resolve the metaconjecture of N.V. Ivanov, which asserts that any "sufficiently rich" object associated to a surface has automorphism group isomorphic to the extended mapping class group, for a broad class of such objects. As applications, we show: (1) right-angled Artin groups and surface groups cannot be isomorphic to normal subgroups of mapping class groups containing elements of small support, (2) normal subgroups of distinct mapping class groups cannot be isomorphic if they both have elements of small support, and (3) distinct normal subgroups of the mapping class group with elements of small support are not isomorphic. Our results also suggest a new framework for the classification of normal subgroups of the mapping class group.Comment: 57 pages, 11 figure
    • …
    corecore