A survey on opinion summarization technique s for social media

The volume of data on the social media is huge and even keeps increasing. The need for efficient processing of this extensive information resulted in increasing research interest in knowledge engineering tasks such as Opinion Summarization. This survey shows the current opinion summarization challenges for social media, then the necessary pre-summarization steps like preprocessing, features extraction, noise elimination, and handling of synonym features. Next, it covers the various approaches used in opinion summarization like Visualization, Abstractive, Aspect based, Query-focused, Real Time, Update Summarization, and highlight other Opinion Summarization approaches such as Contrastive, Concept-based, Community Detection, Domain Specific, Bilingual, Social Bookmarking, and Social Media Sampling. It covers the different datasets used in opinion summarization and future work suggested in each technique. Finally, it provides different ways for evaluating opinion summarization

AI approaches to understand human deceptions, perceptions, and perspectives in social media

Social media platforms have created virtual space for sharing user generated information, connecting, and interacting among users. However, there are research and societal challenges: 1) The users are generating and sharing the disinformation 2) It is difficult to understand citizens\u27 perceptions or opinions expressed on wide variety of topics; and 3) There are overloaded information and echo chamber problems without overall understanding of the different perspectives taken by different people or groups. This dissertation addresses these three research challenges with advanced AI and Machine Learning approaches. To address the fake news, as deceptions on the facts, this dissertation presents Machine Learning approaches for fake news detection models, and a hybrid method for topic identification, whether they are fake or real. To understand the user\u27s perceptions or attitude toward some topics, this study analyzes the sentiments expressed in social media text. The sentiment analysis of posts can be used as an indicator to measure how topics are perceived by the users and how their perceptions as a whole can affect decision makers in government and industry, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is difficult to measure the public perception of government policies issued during the pandemic. The citizen responses to the government policies are diverse, ranging from security or goodwill to confusion, fear, or anger. This dissertation provides a near real-time approach to track and monitor public reactions toward government policies by continuously collecting and analyzing Twitter posts about the COVID-19 pandemic. To address the social media\u27s overwhelming number of posts, content echo-chamber, and information isolation issue, this dissertation provides a multiple view-based summarization framework where the same contents can be summarized according to different perspectives. This framework includes components of choosing the perspectives, and advanced text summarization approaches. The proposed approaches in this dissertation are demonstrated with a prototype system to continuously collect Twitter data about COVID-19 government health policies and provide analysis of citizen concerns toward the policies, and the data is analyzed for fake news detection and for generating multiple-view summaries

Metric for seleting the number of topics in the LDA Model

The latest technological trends are driving a vast and growing amount of textual data. Topic modeling is a useful tool for extracting information from large corpora of text. A topic template is based on a corpus of documents, discovers the topics that permeate the corpus and assigns documents to those topics. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model is the main, or most popular, of the probabilistic topic models. The LDA model is conditioned by three parameters: two Dirichlet hyperparameters (α and β ) and the number of topics (K). Determining the parameter K is extremely important and not extensively explored in the literature, mainly due to the intensive computation and long processing time. Most topic modeling methods implicitly assume that the number of topics is known in advance, thus considering it demands an exogenous parameter. That is annoying, leaving the technique prone to subjectivities. The quality of insights offered by LDA is quite sensitive to the value of the parameter K, and perhaps an excess of subjectivity in its choice might influence the confidence managers put on the techniques results, thus undermining its usage by firms. This dissertation’s main objective is to develop a metric to identify the ideal value for the parameter K of the LDA model that allows an adequate representation of the corpus and within a tolerable elapsed time of the process. We apply the proposed metric alongside existing metrics to two datasets. Experiments show that the proposed method selects a number of topics similar to that of other metrics, but with better performance in terms of processing time. Although each metric has its own method for determining the number of topics, some results are similar for the same database, as evidenced in the study. Our metric is superior when considering the processing time. Experiments show this method is effective.As tendências tecnológicas mais recentes impulsionam uma vasta e crescente quantidade de dados textuais. Modelagem de tópicos é uma ferramenta útil para extrair informações relevantes de grandes corpora de texto. Um modelo de tópico é baseado em um corpus de documentos, descobre os tópicos que permeiam o corpus e atribui documentos a esses tópicos. O modelo de Alocação de Dirichlet Latente (LDA) é o principal, ou mais popular, dos modelos de tópicos probabilísticos. O modelo LDA é condicionado por três parâmetros: os hiperparâmetros de Dirichlet (α and β ) e o número de tópicos (K). A determinação do parâmetro K é extremamente importante e pouco explorada na literatura, principalmente devido à computação intensiva e ao longo tempo de processamento. A maioria dos métodos de modelagem de tópicos assume implicitamente que o número de tópicos é conhecido com antecedência, portanto, considerando que exige um parâmetro exógeno. Isso é um tanto complicado para o pesquisador pois acaba acrescentando à técnica uma subjetividade. A qualidade dos insights oferecidos pelo LDA é bastante sensível ao valor do parâmetro K, e pode-se argumentar que um excesso de subjetividade em sua escolha possa influenciar a confiança que os gerentes depositam nos resultados da técnica, prejudicando assim seu uso pelas empresas. O principal objetivo desta dissertação é desenvolver uma métrica para identificar o valor ideal para o parâmetro K do modelo LDA que permita uma representação adequada do corpus e dentro de um tempo de processamento tolerável. Embora cada métrica possua método próprio para determinação do número de tópicos, alguns resultados são semelhantes para a mesma base de dados, conforme evidenciado no estudo. Nossa métrica é superior ao considerar o tempo de processamento. Experimentos mostram que esse método é eficaz