12 research outputs found
Effect of guideline based computerised decision support on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation
Objective To determine the extent to which computerised decision support can improve concordance of multidisciplinary teams with therapeutic decisions recommended by guidelines
Does technology acceptance determine attitudes towards health information technology? The case of electronic remote blood delivery
For many Healthcare Technology Interventions (HIT) attitudes and experiences can have a significant impact on
successful implementations. Within transfusion services it is recognized that differences in perspective between
blood bank staff and nursing staff affect the adoption of safety practices or interventions. This multi-center study
used a questionnaire survey to investigate differences in technology acceptance and attitudes towards Electronic
Remote Blood Delivery (ERBD) between blood bank and operating room staff. The results of the survey revealed a
significant correlation between attitudes and usage of technology and ERBD acceptance and usability scores
(p<.01) as well as a significant effect of role on ERBD acceptance and usability scores (p<.05)
Efficient Decision Support Systems
This series is directed to diverse managerial professionals who are leading the transformation of individual domains by using expert information and domain knowledge to drive decision support systems (DSSs). The series offers a broad range of subjects addressed in specific areas such as health care, business management, banking, agriculture, environmental improvement, natural resource and spatial management, aviation administration, and hybrid applications of information technology aimed to interdisciplinary issues. This book series is composed of three volumes: Volume 1 consists of general concepts and methodology of DSSs; Volume 2 consists of applications of DSSs in the biomedical domain; Volume 3 consists of hybrid applications of DSSs in multidisciplinary domains. The book is shaped decision support strategies in the new infrastructure that assists the readers in full use of the creative technology to manipulate input data and to transform information into useful decisions for decision makers
Health Figures: An Open Source JavaScript Library for Health Data Visualization
The way we look at data has a great impact on how we can understand it,
particularly when the data is related to health and wellness. Due to the
increased use of self-tracking devices and the ongoing shift towards preventive
medicine, better understanding of our health data is an important part of
improving the general welfare of the citizens. Electronic Health Records,
self-tracking devices and mobile applications provide a rich variety of data
but it often becomes difficult to understand. We implemented the hFigures
library inspired on the hGraph visualization with additional improvements. The
purpose of the library is to provide a visual representation of the evolution
of health measurements in a complete and useful manner. We researched the
usefulness and usability of the library by building an application for health
data visualization in a health coaching program. We performed a user evaluation
with Heuristic Evaluation, Controlled User Testing and Usability
Questionnaires. In the Heuristics Evaluation the average response was 6.3 out
of 7 points and the Cognitive Walkthrough done by usability experts indicated
no design or mismatch errors. In the CSUQ usability test the system obtained an
average score of 6.13 out of 7, and in the ASQ usability test the overall
satisfaction score was 6.64 out of 7. We developed hFigures, an open source
library for visualizing a complete, accurate and normalized graphical
representation of health data. The idea is based on the concept of the hGraph
but it provides additional key features, including a comparison of multiple
health measurements over time. We conducted a usability evaluation of the
library as a key component of an application for health and wellness
monitoring. The results indicate that the data visualization library was
helpful in assisting users in understanding health data and its evolution over
time.Comment: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 16.1 (2016
Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve chronic disease management, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, ongoing disease and treatment monitoring, and patient behavior modification. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve the processes of chronic care (such as diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease) and associated patient outcomes (such as effects on biomarkers and clinical exacerbations).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid's EBM Reviews database, Inspec, and reference lists for potentially eligible articles published up to January 2010. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of CCDSSs to usual practice or non-CCDSS controls. Trials were eligible if at least one component of the CCDSS was designed to support chronic disease management. We considered studies 'positive' if they showed a statistically significant improvement in at least 50% of relevant outcomes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of 55 included trials, 87% (n = 48) measured system impact on the process of care and 52% (n = 25) of those demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Sixty-five percent (36/55) of trials measured impact on, typically, non-major (surrogate) patient outcomes, and 31% (n = 11) of those demonstrated benefits. Factors of interest to decision makers, such as cost, user satisfaction, system interface and feature sets, unique design and deployment characteristics, and effects on user workflow were rarely investigated or reported.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A small majority (just over half) of CCDSSs improved care processes in chronic disease management and some improved patient health. Policy makers, healthcare administrators, and practitioners should be aware that the evidence of CCDSS effectiveness is limited, especially with respect to the small number and size of studies measuring patient outcomes.</p
A model on factors affecting nurses adoption of health information technology
Healthcare organisations are using Health Information Technology (HIT) to
improve efficiency, reduce cost and reduce medical errors. This study focused on
the factors that influence the acceptance of HIT among nurses in Saudi hospitals.
This research used a 6 stage mixed-methods research approach. Literature was
used to search for established models and frameworks of technology
acceptance, and the many factors that could play a role. In the field study, the
nature of practical HIT issues at the Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC)
and the Heraa Hospital were studied, and combined with literature to create a
HIT Implementation Issues Framework. The framework consolidates elements
from the Technological, Organisational, Environmental and Human dimensions.
The researcher participated in further PSMMC projects in the design and
implementation of the new Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation System and the
Nurses and Pharmacists’ Communication System. From the implementation
experience, pertinent factors were added to the Technology Acceptance Model
and the “Nurses Acceptance Model” was proposed. The proposed model has
eleven independent parameters, two dependent parameters, as well as seven
moderators of key relationships. A questionnaire with 71 entries was distributed
to over 2800 nurses in 52 wards in PSMMC. SPSS was used for data screening
and descriptive statistics. The SmartPLS software was used for analysis and
testing of the proposed hypotheses. The findings refined the “Nurses Acceptance
Model” and highlight the significance of User Involvement and Training.
The “Nurses Acceptance Model” enhances the scientific understanding of
variables that affect technology acceptance among nurses in Saudi hospitals.
The HIT Implementation Issues Framework helps hospital decision makers to
plan HIT projects to improve the likelihood of successful adoption
The role of personal mitigating factors in criminal sentencing judgments: an empirical investigation
Criminal sentencers must weight and integrate many different factors to reach a judgment, including aggravating factors that argue for a harsher sentence, and mitigating factors that suggest a more lenient sentence. Personal Mitigating Factors (PMFs) relate to the offender, rather than the offence (e.g., remorse or youth/immaturity). Research shows that discretionary sentencing produces inconsistency and bias and lacks the transparency needed to maintain public trust in justice. Although many jurisdictions have introduced more structured sentencing, the mitigation process remains largely discretionary. Structuring personal mitigation could help produce fairer sentences. Any structured approach must, however, be informed by empirical data, and little is known about how sentencers use PMFs, or how the public judges them. This thesis examined the role of three commonly occurring PMFs: remorse, good character, and addressing addiction.
Study 1 examined sentencers’ use of PMFs in cases of assault and burglary through a statistical analysis of annual sentencing data from the Crown Court in England and Wales. Study 2 used a qualitative analysis of interviews with a small sample of Crown Court judges to further explore the findings of Study 1 and identify topics for future research. Studies 3 and 4 used experimental designs to measure how the three PMFs influenced public judgments about sentencing fairness and choice of sentence length. Study 4’s “idiographic” design permitted evaluation of the variation between individuals’ judgments about PMFs.
The present thesis identified several issues with current sentencing practice, notably the underweighting of multiple co-occurring PMFs, and proposed some practical options for structuring the personal mitigation process. The thesis also identified conflicts between sentencers’ use of PMFs and public judgments, and suggested how the gap between sentencers and the public could be closed. Lastly, the thesis illustrates how methodology from psychology can be used to advance our understanding of criminal sentencing