4 research outputs found

    Studying the inertias of LCM matrices and revisiting the Bourque-Ligh conjecture

    Get PDF
    Let S={x1,x2,…,xn}S=\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\} be a finite set of distinct positive integers. Throughout this article we assume that the set SS is GCD closed. The LCM matrix [S][S] of the set SS is defined to be the n×nn\times n matrix with lcm(xi,xj)\mathrm{lcm}(x_i,x_j) as its ijij element. The famous Bourque-Ligh conjecture used to state that the LCM matrix of a GCD closed set SS is always invertible, but currently it is a well-known fact that any nontrivial LCM matrix is indefinite and under the right circumstances it can be even singular (even if the set SS is assumed to be GCD closed). However, not much more is known about the inertia of LCM matrices in general. The ultimate goal of this article is to improve this situation. Assuming that SS is a meet closed set we define an entirely new lattice-theoretic concept by saying that an element xi∈Sx_i\in S generates a double-chain set in SS if the set meetcl(CS(xi))∖CS(xi)\mathrm{meetcl}(C_S(x_i))\setminus C_S(x_i) can be expressed as a union of two disjoint chains (here the set CS(xi)C_S(x_i) consists of all the elements of the set SS that are covered by xix_i and meetcl(CS(xi))\mathrm{meetcl}(C_S(x_i)) is the smallest meet closed subset of SS that contains the set CS(xi)C_S(x_i)). We then proceed by studying the values of the M\"obius function on sets in which every element generates a double-chain set and use the properties of the M\"obius function to explain why the Bourque-Ligh conjecture holds in so many cases and fails in certain very specific instances. After that we turn our attention to the inertia and see that in some cases it is possible to determine the inertia of an LCM matrix simply by looking at the lattice-theoretic structure of (S,∣)(S,|) alone. Finally, we are going to show how to construct LCM matrices in which the majority of the eigenvalues is either negative or positive
    corecore