Structural Representation: Reducing Multi-Modal Image Registration to Mono-Modal Problem

Registration of multi-modal images has been a challenging taskdue to the complex intensity relationship between images. Thestandard multi-modal approach tends to use sophisticated similaritymeasures, such as mutual information, to assess the accuracyof the alignment. Employing such measures imply the increase inthe computational time and complexity, and makes it highly difficultfor the optimization process to converge. The presented registrationmethod works based on structural representations of imagescaptured from different modalities, in order to convert the multimodalproblem into a mono-modal one. Two different representationmethods are presented. One is based on a combination ofphase congruency and gradient information of the input images,and the other utilizes a modified version of entropy images in apatch-based manner. Sample results are illustrated based on experimentsperformed on brain images from different modalities

Multi-Atlas based Segmentation of Multi-Modal Brain Images

Brain image analysis is playing a fundamental role in clinical and population-based epidemiological studies. Several brain disorder studies involve quantitative interpretation of brain scans and particularly require accurate measurement and delineation of tissue volumes in the scans. Automatic segmentation methods have been proposed to provide reliability and accuracy of the labelling as well as performing an automated procedure. Taking advantage of prior information about the brain's anatomy provided by an atlas as a reference model can help simplify the labelling process. The segmentation in the atlas-based approach will be problematic if the atlas and the target image are not accurately aligned, or if the atlas does not appropriately represent the anatomical structure/region. The accuracy of the segmentation can be improved by utilising a group of atlases. Employing multiple atlases brings about considerable issues in segmenting a new subject's brain image. Registering multiple atlases to the target scan and fusing labels from registered atlases, for a population obtained from different modalities, are challenging tasks: image-intensity comparisons may no longer be valid, since image brightness can have highly diff ering meanings in dfferent modalities. The focus is on the problem of multi-modality and methods are designed and developed to deal with this issue specifically in image registration and label fusion. To deal with multi-modal image registration, two independent approaches are followed. First, a similarity measure is proposed based upon comparing the self-similarity of each of the images to be aligned. Second, two methods are proposed to reduce the multi-modal problem to a mono-modal one by constructing representations not relying on the image intensities. Structural representations work on the basis of using un-decimated complex wavelet representation in one method, and modified approach using entropy in the other one. To handle the cross-modality label fusion, a method is proposed to weight atlases based on atlas-target similarity. The atlas-target similarity is measured by scale-based comparison taking advantage of structural features captured from un-decimated complex wavelet coefficients. The proposed methods are assessed using the simulated and real brain data from computed tomography images and different modes of magnetic resonance images. Experimental results reflect the superiority of the proposed methods over the classical and state-of-the art methods

Multi-modality cardiac image computing: a survey

Multi-modality cardiac imaging plays a key role in the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. It allows a combination of complementary anatomical, morphological and functional information, increases diagnosis accuracy, and improves the efficacy of cardiovascular interventions and clinical outcomes. Fully-automated processing and quantitative analysis of multi-modality cardiac images could have a direct impact on clinical research and evidence-based patient management. However, these require overcoming significant challenges including inter-modality misalignment and finding optimal methods to integrate information from different modalities. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of multi-modality imaging in cardiology, the computing methods, the validation strategies, the related clinical workflows and future perspectives. For the computing methodologies, we have a favored focus on the three tasks, i.e., registration, fusion and segmentation, which generally involve multi-modality imaging data, either combining information from different modalities or transferring information across modalities. The review highlights that multi-modality cardiac imaging data has the potential of wide applicability in the clinic, such as trans-aortic valve implantation guidance, myocardial viability assessment, and catheter ablation therapy and its patient selection. Nevertheless, many challenges remain unsolved, such as missing modality, modality selection, combination of imaging and non-imaging data, and uniform analysis and representation of different modalities. There is also work to do in defining how the well-developed techniques fit in clinical workflows and how much additional and relevant information they introduce. These problems are likely to continue to be an active field of research and the questions to be answered in the future