Supereulerian Properties in Graphs and Hamiltonian Properties in Line Graphs

Following the trend initiated by Chvatal and Erdos, using the relation of independence number and connectivity as sufficient conditions for hamiltonicity of graphs, we characterize supereulerian graphs with small matching number, which implies a characterization of hamiltonian claw-free graph with small independence number.;We also investigate strongly spanning trailable graphs and their applications to hamiltonian connected line graphs characterizations for small strongly spanning trailable graphs and strongly spanning trailable graphs with short longest cycles are obtained. In particular, we have found a graph family F of reduced nonsupereulerian graphs such that for any graph G with kappa\u27(G) ≥ 2 and alpha\u27( G) ≤ 3, G is supereulerian if and only if the reduction of G is not in F..;We proved that any connected graph G with at most 12 vertices, at most one vertex of degree 2 and without vertices of degree 1 is either supereulerian or its reduction is one of six exceptional cases. This is applied to show that if a 3-edge-connected graph has the property that every pair of edges is joined by a longest path of length at most 8, then G is strongly spanning trailable if and only if G is not the wagner graph.;Using charge and discharge method, we prove that every 3-connected, essentially 10-connected line graph is hamiltonian connected. We also provide a unified treatment with short proofs for several former results by Fujisawa and Ota in [20], by Kaiser et al in [24], and by Pfender in [40]. New sufficient conditions for hamiltonian claw-free graphs are also obtained

On Eulerian subgraphs and hamiltonian line graphs

A graph {\color{black}$G$} is Hamilton-connected if for any pair of distinct vertices {\color{black}$u, v \in V(G)$}, {\color{black}$G$} has a spanning $(u,v)$-path; {\color{black}$G$} is 1-hamiltonian if for any vertex subset $S \subseteq {\color{black}V(G)}$ with $|S| \le 1$, $G - S$ has a spanning cycle. Let $\delta(G)$, $\alpha\u27(G)$ and $L(G)$ denote the minimum degree, the matching number and the line graph of a graph $G$, respectively. The following result is obtained. {\color{black} Let $G$ be a simple graph} with $|E(G)| \ge 3$. If $\delta(G) \geq \alpha\u27(G)$, then each of the following holds. \\ (i) $L(G)$ is Hamilton-connected if and only if $\kappa(L(G))\ge 3$. \\ (ii) $L(G)$ is 1-hamiltonian if and only if $\kappa(L(G))\ge 3$. %==========sp For a graph $G$, an integer $s \ge 0$ and distinct vertices $u, v \in V(G)$, an $(s; u, v)$-path-system of $G$ is a subgraph $H$ consisting of $s$ internally disjoint $(u,v)$-paths. The spanning connectivity $\kappa^*(G)$ is the largest integer $s$ such that for any $k$ with $0 \le k \le s$ and for any $u, v \in V(G)$ with $u \neq v$, $G$ has a spanning $(k; u,v)$-path-system. It is known that $\kappa^*(G) \le \kappa(G)$, and determining if $\kappa^*(G) \u3e 0$ is an NP-complete problem. A graph $G$ is maximally spanning connected if $\kappa^*(G) = \kappa(G)$. Let $msc(G)$ and $s_k(G)$ be the smallest integers $m$ and $m\u27$ such that $L^m(G)$ is maximally spanning connected and $\kappa^*(L^{m\u27}(G)) \ge k$, respectively. We show that every locally-connected line graph with connectivity at least 3 is maximally spanning connected, and that the spanning connectivity of a locally-connected line graph can be polynomially determined. As applications, we also determined best possible upper bounds for $msc(G)$ and $s_k(G)$, and characterized the extremal graphs reaching the upper bounds. %==============st For integers $s \ge 0$ and $t \ge 0$, a graph $G$ is $(s,t)$-supereulerian if for any disjoint edge sets $X, Y \subseteq E(G)$ with $|X|\le s$ and $|Y|\le t$, $G$ has a spanning closed trail that contains $X$ and avoids $Y$. Pulleyblank in [J. Graph Theory, 3 (1979) 309-310] showed that determining whether a graph is $(0,0)$-supereulerian, even when restricted to planar graphs, is NP-complete. Settling an open problem of Bauer, Catlin in [J. Graph Theory, 12 (1988) 29-45] showed that every simple graph $G$ on $n$ vertices with $\delta(G) \ge \frac{n}{5} -1$, when $n$ is sufficiently large, is $(0,0)$-supereulerian or is contractible to $K_{2,3}$. We prove the following for any nonnegative integers $s$ and $t$. \\ (i) For any real numbers $a$ and $b$ with $0 \u3c a \u3c 1$, there exists a family of finitely many graphs \F(a,b;s,t) such that if $G$ is a simple graph on $n$ vertices with $\kappa\u27(G) \ge t+2$ and $\delta(G) \ge an + b$, then either $G$ is $(s,t)$-supereulerian, or $G$ is contractible to a member in \F(a,b;s,t). \\ (ii) Let $\ell K_2$ denote the connected loopless graph with two vertices and $\ell$ parallel edges. If $G$ is a simple graph on $n$ vertices with $\kappa\u27(G) \ge t+2$ and $\delta(G) \ge \frac{n}{2}-1$, then when $n$ is sufficiently large, either $G$ is $(s,t)$-supereulerian, or for some integer $j$ with $t+2 \le j \le s+t$, $G$ is contractible to a $j K_2$. %==================index For a hamiltonian property \cp, Clark and Wormold introduced the problem of investigating the value \cp(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: $\kappa\u27(G) \ge a$ and $\delta(G) \ge b\}$, and proposed a few problems to determine \cp(a,b) with $b \ge a \ge 4$ when \cp is being hamiltonian, edge-hamiltonian and hamiltonian-connected. Zhan in 1986 proved that the line graph of a 4-edge-connected graph is Hamilton-connected, which implies a solution to the unsettled cases of above-mentioned problem. We consider an extended version of the problem. Let $ess\u27(G)$ denote the essential edge-connectivity of a graph $G$, and define \cp\u27(a,b) = \max\{\min\{n: L^n(G) has property \cp\}: $ess\u27(G) \ge a$ and $\delta(G) \ge b\}$. We investigate the values of \cp\u27(a,b) when \cp is one of these hamiltonian properties. In particular, we show that for any values of $b \ge 1$, \cp\u27(4,b) \le 2 and \cp\u27(4,b) = 1 if and only if Thomassen\u27s conjecture that every 4-connected line graph is hamiltonian is valid

Circuits and Cycles in Graphs and Matroids

This dissertation mainly focuses on characterizing cycles and circuits in graphs, line graphs and matroids. We obtain the following advances. 1. Results in graphs and line graphs. For a connected graph G not isomorphic to a path, a cycle or a K1,3, let pc(G) denote the smallest integer n such that the nth iterated line graph Ln(G) is panconnected. A path P is a divalent path of G if the internal vertices of P are of degree 2 in G. If every edge of P is a cut edge of G, then P is a bridge divalent path of G; if the two ends of P are of degree s and t, respectively, then P is called a divalent (s, t)-path. Let l(G) = max{m : G has a divalent path of length m that is not both of length 2 and in a K3}. We prove the following. (i) If G is a connected triangular graph, then L(G) is panconnected if and only if G is essentially 3-edge-connected. (ii) pc(G) ≤ l(G) + 2. Furthermore, if l(G) ≥ 2, then pc(G) = l(G) + 2 if and only if for some integer t ≥ 3, G has a bridge divalent (3, t)-path of length l(G). For a graph G, the supereulerian width μ′(G) of a graph G is the largest integer s such that G has a spanning (k;u,v)-trail-system, for any integer k with 1 ≤ k ≤ s, and for any u, v ∈ V (G) with u ̸= v. Thus μ′(G) ≥ 2 implies that G is supereulerian, and so graphs with higher supereulerian width are natural generalizations of supereulerian graphs. Settling an open problem of Bauer, Catlin in [J. Graph Theory 12 (1988), 29-45] proved that if a simple graph G on n ≥ 17 vertices satisfy δ(G) ≥ n − 1, then μ′(G) ≥ 2. In this paper, we show that for 4 any real numbers a, b with 0 \u3c a \u3c 1 and any integer s \u3e 0, there exists a finite graph family F = F(a,b,s) such that for a simple graph G with n = |V(G)|, if for any u,v ∈ V(G) with uv ∈/ E(G), max{dG(u), dG(v)} ≥ an + b, then either μ′(G) ≥ s + 1 or G is contractible to a member in F. When a = 1,b = −3, we show that if n is sufficiently large, K3,3 is the only 42 obstacle for a 3-edge-connected graph G to satisfy μ′(G) ≥ 3. An hourglass is a graph obtained from K5 by deleting the edges in a cycle of length 4, and an hourglass-free graph is one that has no induced subgraph isomorphic to an hourglass. Kriesell in [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 82 (2001), 306-315] proved that every 4-connected hourglass-free line graph is Hamilton-connected, and Kaiser, Ryj ́aˇcek and Vr ́ana in [Discrete Mathematics, 321 (2014) 1-11] extended it by showing that every 4-connected hourglass-free line graph is 1- Hamilton-connected. We characterize all essentially 4-edge-connected graphs whose line graph is hourglass-free. Consequently we prove that for any integer s and for any hourglass-free line graph L(G), each of the following holds. (i) If s ≥ 2, then L(G) is s-hamiltonian if and only if κ(L(G)) ≥ s + 2; (ii) If s ≥ 1, then L(G) is s-Hamilton-connected if and only if κ(L(G)) ≥ s + 3. For integers s1, s2, s3 \u3e 0, let Ns1,s2,s3 denote the graph obtained by identifying each vertex of a K3 with an end vertex of three disjoint paths Ps1+1, Ps2+1, Ps3+1 of length s1,s2 and s3, respectively. We prove the following results. (i)LetN1 ={Ns1,s2,s3 :s1 \u3e0,s1 ≥s2 ≥s3 ≥0ands1+s2+s3 ≤6}. Thenforany N ∈ N1, every N-free line graph L(G) with |V (L(G))| ≥ s + 3 is s-hamiltonian if and only if κ(L(G)) ≥ s + 2. (ii)LetN2={Ns1,s2,s3 :s1\u3e0,s1≥s2≥s3≥0ands1+s2+s3≤4}.ThenforanyN∈N2, every N -free line graph L(G) with |V (L(G))| ≥ s + 3 is s-Hamilton-connected if and only if κ(L(G)) ≥ s + 3. 2. Results in matroids. A matroid M with a distinguished element e0 ∈ E(M) is a rooted matroid with e0 being the root. We present a characterization of all connected binary rooted matroids whose root lies in at most three circuits, and a characterization of all connected binary rooted matroids whose root lies in all but at most three circuits. While there exist infinitely many such matroids, the number of serial reductions of such matroids is finite. In particular, we find two finite families of binary matroids M1 and M2 and prove the following. (i) For some e0 ∈ E(M), M has at most three circuits containing e0 if and only if the serial reduction of M is isomorphic to a member in M1. (ii) If for some e0 ∈ E(M), M has at most three circuits not containing e0 if and only if the serial reduction of M is isomorphic to a member in M2. These characterizations will be applied to show that every connected binary matroid M with at least four circuits has a 1-hamiltonian circuit graph

A study on supereulerian digraphs and spanning trails in digraphs

A strong digraph D is eulerian if for any v ∈ V (D), d+D (v) = d−D (v). A digraph D is supereulerian if D contains a spanning eulerian subdigraph, or equivalently, a spanning closed directed trail. A digraph D is trailable if D has a spanning directed trail. This dissertation focuses on a study of trailable digraphs and supereulerian digraphs from the following aspects. 1. Strong Trail-Connected, Supereulerian and Trailable Digraphs. For a digraph D, D is trailable digraph if D has a spanning trail. A digraph D is strongly trail- connected if for any two vertices u and v of D, D posses both a spanning (u, v)-trail and a spanning (v,u)-trail. As the case when u = v is possible, every strongly trail-connected digraph is also su- pereulerian. Let D be a digraph. Let S(D) = {e ∈ A(D) : e is symmetric in D}. A digraph D is symmetric if A(D) = S(D). The symmetric core of D, denoted by J(D), has vertex set V (D) and arc set S(D). We have found a well-characterized digraph family D each of whose members does not have a spanning trail with its underlying graph spanned by a K2,n−2 such that for any strong digraph D with its matching number α′(D) and arc-strong-connectivity λ(D), if n = |V (D)| ≥ 3 and λ(D) ≥ α′(D) − 1, then each of the following holds. (i) There exists a family D of well-characterized digraphs such that for any digraph D with α′(D) ≤ 2, D has a spanning trial if and only if D is not a member in D. (ii) If α′(D) ≥ 3, then D has a spanning trail. (iii) If α′(D) ≥ 3 and n ≥ 2α′(D) + 3, then D is supereulerian. (iv) If λ(D) ≥ α′(D) ≥ 4 and n ≥ 2α′(D) + 3, then for any pair of vertices u and v of D, D contains a spanning (u, v)-trail. 2. Supereulerian Digraph Strong Products. A cycle vertex cover of a digraph D is a collection of directed cycles in D such that every vertex in D lies in at least one dicycle in this collection, and such that the union of the arc sets of these directed cycles induce a connected subdigraph of D. A subdigraph F of a digraph D is a circulation if for every vertex v in F, the indegree of v equals its outdegree, and a spanning circulation if F is a cycle factor. Define f(D) to be the smallest cardinality of a cycle vertex cover of the digraph D/F obtained from D by contracting all arcs in F , among all circulations F of D. In [International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 8 (2019) 12-19], it is proved that if D1 and D2 are nontrivial strong digraphs such that D1 is supereulerian and D2 has a cycle vertex cover C′ with |C′| ≤ |V (D1)|, then the Cartesian product D1 and D2 is also supereulerian. We prove that for strong digraphs D1 and D2, if for some cycle factor F1 of D1, the digraph formed from D1 by contracting arcs in F1 is hamiltonian with f(D2) not bigger than |V (D1)|, then the strong product D1 and D2 is supereulerian

Movement patterns, stock delineation and conservation of an overexploited fishery species, Lithognathus Lithognathus (Pisces: Sparidae)

White steenbras Lithognathus lithognathus (Pisces: Sparidae) has been a major target species of numerous fisheries in South Africa, since the late 19th century. Historically, it contributed substantially to annual catches in commercial net fisheries, and became dominant in recreational shore catches in the latter half of the 20th century. However, overexploitation in both sectors resulted in severe declines in abundance. The ultimate collapse of the stock by the end of the last century, and the failure of traditional management measures to protect the species indicate that a new management approach for this species is necessary. The species was identified as a priority for research, management and conservation in a National Linefish Status Report. Despite knowledge on aspects of its biology and life history, little is known about juvenile habitat use patterns, home range dynamics and movement behaviour in estuaries. Similarly, the movement and migration of larger juveniles and adults in the marine environment are poorly understood. Furthermore, there is a complete lack of information on its genetic stock structure. Such information is essential for effective management of a fishery species. This thesis aimed to address the gaps in the understanding of white steenbras movement patterns and genetic stock structure, and provide an assessment of its current conservation status. The study adopted a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating a range of methods and drawing on available information, including published literature, unpublished reports and data from long-term monitoring programmes. Acoustic telemetry, conducted in a range of estuaries, showed high site fidelity, restricted area use, small home ranges relative to the size of the estuary, and a high level of residency within estuaries at the early juvenile life stage. Behaviour within estuaries was dominated by station-keeping, superimposed by a strong diel behaviour, presumably based on feeding and/or predator avoidance, with individuals entering the shallow littoral zone at night to feed, and seeking refuge in the deeper channel areas during the daytime. Conventional dart tagging and recapture data from four ongoing, long-term coastal fish tagging projects, spread throughout the distribution of this species, indicated high levels of residency in the surf zone at the late juvenile and sub-adult life stages. Consequently, juvenile and sub-adult white steenbras are vulnerable to localised depletion, although they can be effectively protected by suitably positioned estuarine protected areas (EPAs) and marine protected areas (MPAs), respectively. It has been hypothesized that adult white steenbras undertake large-scale coastal migrations between summer aggregation areas and winter spawning grounds. The scale of observed coastal movements was correlated with fish size (and age), with larger fish undertaking considerably longer-distance coastal movements than smaller individuals, supporting this hypothesis. Given the migratory behaviour of adults, and indications that limited spawning habitat exists, MPAs designed to protect white steenbras during the adult life stage should encompass all known spawning aggregation sites. The fishery is plagued by problems such as low compliance and low enforcement capacity, and alternative management measures, such as seasonal closure, need to be evaluated. Despite considerable conventional dart tagging effort around the coastline (5 782 fish tagged) with 292 recaptures there remains a lack of empirical evidence of fish migrating long distances (> 600 km) between aggregation and spawning areas. This uncertainty in the level of connectivity among coastal regions was addressed using mitochondrial DNA sequencing and genotyping of microsatellite repeat loci in the nuclear genome, which showed no evidence of major geographic barriers to gene flow in this species. Samples collected throughout the white steenbras core distribution showed high genetic diversity, low genetic differentiation and no evidence of isolation by distance or localised spawning. Although historically dominant in several fisheries, analysis of long-term commercial and recreational catch data for white steenbras indicated considerable declines and ultimately stock collapse. Improved catch-per-unit-effort in two large MPAs subsequent to closure confirmed that MPAs can be effective for the protection of white steenbras. However, the current MPA network encompasses a low proportion of sandy shoreline, for which white steenbras exhibits an affinity. Many MPAs do not prohibit recreational shore angling, which currently accounts for the greatest proportion of the total annual catch. Furthermore, EPAs within the juvenile distribution protect a negligible proportion of the total available surface area of estuaries – habitat on which white steenbras is wholly dependent. Despite some evidence of recent increases in abundance in estuaries and the surf zone in certain areas, white steenbras meets the criteria for “Endangered” on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, and for “Protected species” status on the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act of South Africa. The species requires improved management, with consideration for its life-history style, estuarine dependency, surf zone residency, predictable spawning migrations and its poor conservation status. The multidisciplinary approach provides valuable information towards an improved scientific basis for the management of white steenbras and a framework for research that can be adopted for other overexploited, estuarine-associated coastal fishery species