On parameters related to strong and weak domination in graphs

AbstractLet G be a graph. Then μ(G)⩽|V(G)|−δ(G) where μ(G) denotes the weak or independent weak domination number of G and μ(G)⩽|V(G)|−Δ(G) where μ(G) denotes the strong or independent strong domination number of G. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for equality to hold in each case and also describe specific classes of graphs for which equality holds. Finally, we show that the problems of computing iw and ist are NP-hard, even for bipartite graphs

Changing and Unchanging strong efficient edge domination number of some standard graphs when a vertex is removed or an edge is added

Let G=(V,\ E) be a simple graph. A subset S of E(G) is a strong (weak) efficient edge dominating set of G if │Ns[e] S│ = 1 for all e E(G)(│Nw[e] S│ = 1 for all e E(G)) where Ns(e) ={f / f E(G), f is adjacent to e & deg f ≥ deg e}(Nw(e) ={f / f E(G), f is adjacent to e & deg f ≤ deg e}) and Ns[e]=Ns(e){e}(Nw[e] = Nw(e){e}). The minimum cardinality of a strong efficient edge dominating set of G (weak efficient edge dominating set of G) is called a strong efficient edge domination number of G and is denoted by {\gamma\prime}_{se}(G) ({\gamma^\prime}_{we}(G)).When a vertex is removed or an edge is added to the graph, the strong efficient edge domination number may or may not be changed. In this paper the change or unchanged of the strong efficient edge domination number of some standard graphs are determined, when a vertex is removed or an edge is added

Efficient Domination In Fuzzy Graphs and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Graphs in Strong and weak forms

This work defines the concepts of strong efficient dominating set and intuitionistic fuzzy graph. We also introduce an intuitionistic fuzzy graph and a strong efficient dominating number of fuzzy graphs. The strong efficient dominant number in fuzzy graphs has some limitations that are studied, and intuitionistic fuzzy graphs are derived.

Further Results on the Total Roman Domination in Graphs

[EN] Let G be a graph without isolated vertices. A function f:V(G)-> {0,1,2} is a total Roman dominating function on G if every vertex v is an element of V(G) for which f(v)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u is an element of V(G) such that f(u)=2 , and if the subgraph induced by the set {v is an element of V(G):f(v)>= 1} has no isolated vertices. The total Roman domination number of G, denoted gamma tR(G) , is the minimum weight omega (f)=Sigma v is an element of V(G)f(v) among all total Roman dominating functions f on G. In this article we obtain new tight lower and upper bounds for gamma tR(G) which improve the well-known bounds 2 gamma (G)<= gamma tR(G)<= 3 gamma (G) , where gamma (G) represents the classical domination number. In addition, we characterize the graphs that achieve equality in the previous lower bound and we give necessary conditions for the graphs which satisfy the equality in the upper bound above.Cabrera Martínez, A.; Cabrera García, S.; Carrión García, A. (2020). Further Results on the Total Roman Domination in Graphs. Mathematics. 8(3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030349S1883Henning, M. A. (2009). A survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 309(1), 32-63. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2007.12.044Henning, M. A., & Yeo, A. (2013). Total Domination in Graphs. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6525-6Henning, M. A., & Marcon, A. J. (2016). Semitotal Domination in Claw-Free Cubic Graphs. Annals of Combinatorics, 20(4), 799-813. doi:10.1007/s00026-016-0331-zHenning, M. . A., & Marcon, A. J. (2016). Vertices contained in all or in no minimum semitotal dominating set of a tree. Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory, 36(1), 71. doi:10.7151/dmgt.1844Henning, M. A., & Pandey, A. (2019). Algorithmic aspects of semitotal domination in graphs. Theoretical Computer Science, 766, 46-57. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2018.09.019Cockayne, E. J., Dreyer, P. A., Hedetniemi, S. M., & Hedetniemi, S. T. (2004). Roman domination in graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 278(1-3), 11-22. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2003.06.004Stewart, I. (1999). Defend the Roman Empire! Scientific American, 281(6), 136-138. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1299-136Chambers, E. W., Kinnersley, B., Prince, N., & West, D. B. (2009). Extremal Problems for Roman Domination. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 23(3), 1575-1586. doi:10.1137/070699688Favaron, O., Karami, H., Khoeilar, R., & Sheikholeslami, S. M. (2009). On the Roman domination number of a graph. Discrete Mathematics, 309(10), 3447-3451. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2008.09.043Liu, C.-H., & Chang, G. J. (2012). Upper bounds on Roman domination numbers of graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 312(7), 1386-1391. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2011.12.021González, Y., & Rodríguez-Velázquez, J. (2013). Roman domination in Cartesian product graphs and strong product graphs. Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, 7(2), 262-274. doi:10.2298/aadm130813017gLiu, C.-H., & Chang, G. J. (2012). Roman domination on strongly chordal graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 26(3), 608-619. doi:10.1007/s10878-012-9482-yAhangar Abdollahzadeh, H., Henning, M., Samodivkin, V., & Yero, I. (2016). Total Roman domination in graphs. Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, 10(2), 501-517. doi:10.2298/aadm160802017aAmjadi, J., Sheikholeslami, S. M., & Soroudi, M. (2019). On the total Roman domination in trees. Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory, 39(2), 519. doi:10.7151/dmgt.2099Cabrera Martínez, A., Montejano, L. P., & Rodríguez-Velázquez, J. A. (2019). Total Weak Roman Domination in Graphs. Symmetry, 11(6), 831. doi:10.3390/sym1106083

Weak and Strong Reinforcement Number For a Graph

Introducing the weak reinforcement number which is the minimum number of added edges to reduce the weak dominating number, and giving some boundary of this new parameter and trees

Disjoint Dominating Sets with a Perfect Matching

In this paper, we consider dominating sets $D$ and $D'$ such that $D$ and $D'$ are disjoint and there exists a perfect matching between them. Let $DD_{\textrm{m}}(G)$ denote the cardinality of smallest such sets $D, D'$ in $G$ (provided they exist, otherwise $DD_{\textrm{m}}(G) = \infty$). This concept was introduced in [Klostermeyer et al., Theory and Application of Graphs, 2017] in the context of studying a certain graph protection problem. We characterize the trees $T$ for which $DD_{\textrm{m}}(T)$ equals a certain graph protection parameter and for which $DD_{\textrm{m}}(T) = \alpha(T)$, where $\alpha(G)$ is the independence number of $G$. We also further study this parameter in graph products, e.g., by giving bounds for grid graphs, and in graphs of small independence number