298 research outputs found
Baire reductions and good Borel reducibilities
In reference [8] we have considered a wide class of "well-behaved"
reducibilities for sets of reals. In this paper we continue with the study of
Borel reducibilities by proving a dichotomy theorem for the degree-structures
induced by good Borel reducibilities. This extends and improves the results of
[8] allowing to deal with a larger class of notions of reduction (including,
among others, the Baire class functions).Comment: 21 page
A bounded jump for the bounded Turing degrees
We define the bounded jump of A by A^b = {x | Exists i <= x [phi_i (x)
converges and Phi_x^[A|phi_i(x)](x) converges} and let A^[nb] denote the n-th
bounded jump. We demonstrate several properties of the bounded jump, including
that it is strictly increasing and order preserving on the bounded Turing (bT)
degrees (also known as the weak truth-table degrees). We show that the bounded
jump is related to the Ershov hierarchy. Indeed, for n > 1 we have X <=_[bT]
0^[nb] iff X is omega^n-c.e. iff X <=_1 0^[nb], extending the classical result
that X <=_[bT] 0' iff X is omega-c.e. Finally, we prove that the analogue of
Shoenfield inversion holds for the bounded jump on the bounded Turing degrees.
That is, for every X such that 0^b <=_[bT] X <=_[bT] 0^[2b], there is a Y
<=_[bT] 0^b such that Y^b =_[bT] X.Comment: 22 pages. Minor changes for publicatio
Lipschitz and uniformly continuous reducibilities on ultrametric Polish spaces
We analyze the reducibilities induced by, respectively, uniformly continuous,
Lipschitz, and nonexpansive functions on arbitrary ultrametric Polish spaces,
and determine whether under suitable set-theoretical assumptions the induced
degree-structures are well-behaved.Comment: 37 pages, 2 figures, revised version, accepted for publication in the
Festschrift that will be published on the occasion of Victor Selivanov's 60th
birthday by Ontos-Verlag. A mistake has been corrected in Section
Multiple Permitting and Bounded Turing Reducibilities
We look at various properties of the computably enumerable (c.e.) not totally ω-c.e. Turing degrees.
In particular, we are interested in the variant of multiple permitting given by those degrees. We
define a property of left-c.e. sets called universal similarity property which can be viewed as a
universal or uniform version of the property of array noncomputable c.e. sets of agreeing with any
c.e. set on some component of a very strong array. Using a multiple permitting argument, we
prove that the Turing degrees of the left-c.e. sets with the universal similarity property coincide
with the c.e. not totally ω-c.e. degrees. We further introduce and look at various notions of socalled
universal array noncomputability and show that c.e. sets with those properties can be found
exactly in the c.e. not totally ω-c.e. Turing degrees and that they guarantee a special type of
multiple permitting called uniform multiple permitting. We apply these properties of the c.e. not
totally ω-c.e. degrees to give alternative proofs of well-known results on those degrees as well as
to prove new results. E.g., we show that a c.e. Turing degree contains a left-c.e. set which is not
cl-reducible to any complex left-c.e. set if and only if it is not totally ω-c.e. Furthermore, we prove
that the nondistributive finite lattice S7 can be embedded into the c.e. Turing degrees precisely
below any c.e. not totally ω-c.e. degree.
We further look at the question of join preservation for bounded Turing reducibilities r and r′
such that r is stronger than r′. We say that join preservation holds for two reducibilities r and
r′ if every join in the c.e. r-degrees is also a join in the c.e. r′-degrees. We consider the class of
monotone admissible (uniformly) bounded Turing reducibilities, i.e., the reflexive and transitive
Turing reducibilities with use bounded by a function that is contained in a (uniformly computable)
family of strictly increasing computable functions. This class contains for example identity bounded
Turing (ibT-) and computable Lipschitz (cl-) reducibility. Our main result of Chapter 3 is that join
preservation fails for cl and any strictly weaker monotone admissible uniformly bounded Turing
reducibility. We also look at the dual question of meet preservation and show that for all monotone
admissible bounded Turing reducibilities r and r′ such that r is stronger than r′, meet preservation
holds. Finally, we completely solve the question of join and meet preservation in the classical
reducibilities 1, m, tt, wtt and T
Total Representations
Almost all representations considered in computable analysis are partial. We
provide arguments in favor of total representations (by elements of the Baire
space). Total representations make the well known analogy between numberings
and representations closer, unify some terminology, simplify some technical
details, suggest interesting open questions and new invariants of topological
spaces relevant to computable analysis.Comment: 30 page
P-Selectivity, Immunity, and the Power of One Bit
We prove that P-sel, the class of all P-selective sets, is EXP-immune, but is
not EXP/1-immune. That is, we prove that some infinite P-selective set has no
infinite EXP-time subset, but we also prove that every infinite P-selective set
has some infinite subset in EXP/1. Informally put, the immunity of P-sel is so
fragile that it is pierced by a single bit of information.
The above claims follow from broader results that we obtain about the
immunity of the P-selective sets. In particular, we prove that for every
recursive function f, P-sel is DTIME(f)-immune. Yet we also prove that P-sel is
not \Pi_2^p/1-immune
- …