27 research outputs found

    Sets as graphs

    Get PDF
    The aim of this thesis is a mutual transfer of computational and structural results and techniques between sets and graphs. We study combinatorial enumeration of sets, canonical encodings, random generation, digraph immersions. We also investigate the underlying structure of sets in algorithmic terms, or in connection with hereditary graphs classes. Finally, we employ a set-based proof-checker to verify two classical results on claw-free graph

    36th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science: STACS 2019, March 13-16, 2019, Berlin, Germany

    Get PDF

    Planar Disjoint Paths, Treewidth, and Kernels

    Full text link
    In the Planar Disjoint Paths problem, one is given an undirected planar graph with a set of kk vertex pairs (si,ti)(s_i,t_i) and the task is to find kk pairwise vertex-disjoint paths such that the ii-th path connects sis_i to tit_i. We study the problem through the lens of kernelization, aiming at efficiently reducing the input size in terms of a parameter. We show that Planar Disjoint Paths does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by kk unless coNP ⊆\subseteq NP/poly, resolving an open problem by [Bodlaender, Thomass{\'e}, Yeo, ESA'09]. Moreover, we rule out the existence of a polynomial Turing kernel unless the WK-hierarchy collapses. Our reduction carries over to the setting of edge-disjoint paths, where the kernelization status remained open even in general graphs. On the positive side, we present a polynomial kernel for Planar Disjoint Paths parameterized by k+twk + tw, where twtw denotes the treewidth of the input graph. As a consequence of both our results, we rule out the possibility of a polynomial-time (Turing) treewidth reduction to tw=kO(1)tw= k^{O(1)} under the same assumptions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first hardness result of this kind. Finally, combining our kernel with the known techniques [Adler, Kolliopoulos, Krause, Lokshtanov, Saurabh, Thilikos, JCTB'17; Schrijver, SICOMP'94] yields an alternative (and arguably simpler) proof that Planar Disjoint Paths can be solved in time 2O(k2)⋅nO(1)2^{O(k^2)}\cdot n^{O(1)}, matching the result of [Lokshtanov, Misra, Pilipczuk, Saurabh, Zehavi, STOC'20].Comment: To appear at FOCS'23, 82 pages, 30 figure

    35th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science: STACS 2018, February 28-March 3, 2018, Caen, France

    Get PDF
    corecore