Approximate Hamming distance in a stream

We consider the problem of computing a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation of the Hamming distance between a pattern of length $n$ and successive substrings of a stream. We first look at the one-way randomised communication complexity of this problem, giving Alice the first half of the stream and Bob the second half. We show the following: (1) If Alice and Bob both share the pattern then there is an $O(\epsilon^{-4} \log^2 n)$ bit randomised one-way communication protocol. (2) If only Alice has the pattern then there is an $O(\epsilon^{-2}\sqrt{n}\log n)$ bit randomised one-way communication protocol. We then go on to develop small space streaming algorithms for $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Hamming distance which give worst case running time guarantees per arriving symbol. (1) For binary input alphabets there is an $O(\epsilon^{-3} \sqrt{n} \log^{2} n)$ space and $O(\epsilon^{-2} \log{n})$ time streaming $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Hamming distance algorithm. (2) For general input alphabets there is an $O(\epsilon^{-5} \sqrt{n} \log^{4} n)$ space and $O(\epsilon^{-4} \log^3 {n})$ time streaming $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate Hamming distance algorithm.Comment: Submitted to ICALP' 201

Distributed Data Summarization in Well-Connected Networks

We study distributed algorithms for some fundamental problems in data summarization. Given a communication graph G of n nodes each of which may hold a value initially, we focus on computing sum_{i=1}^N g(f_i), where f_i is the number of occurrences of value i and g is some fixed function. This includes important statistics such as the number of distinct elements, frequency moments, and the empirical entropy of the data. In the CONGEST~ model, a simple adaptation from streaming lower bounds shows that it requires Omega~(D+ n) rounds, where D is the diameter of the graph, to compute some of these statistics exactly. However, these lower bounds do not hold for graphs that are well-connected. We give an algorithm that computes sum_{i=1}^{N} g(f_i) exactly in {tau_{G}} * 2^{O(sqrt{log n})} rounds where {tau_{G}} is the mixing time of G. This also has applications in computing the top k most frequent elements. We demonstrate that there is a high similarity between the GOSSIP~ model and the CONGEST~ model in well-connected graphs. In particular, we show that each round of the GOSSIP~ model can be simulated almost perfectly in O~({tau_{G}}) rounds of the CONGEST~ model. To this end, we develop a new algorithm for the GOSSIP~ model that 1 +/- epsilon approximates the p-th frequency moment F_p = sum_{i=1}^N f_i^p in O~(epsilon^{-2} n^{1-k/p}) roundsfor p >= 2, when the number of distinct elements F_0 is at most O(n^{1/(k-1)}). This result can be translated back to the CONGEST~ model with a factor O~({tau_{G}}) blow-up in the number of rounds

The k-mismatch problem revisited

We revisit the complexity of one of the most basic problems in pattern matching. In the k-mismatch problem we must compute the Hamming distance between a pattern of length m and every m-length substring of a text of length n, as long as that Hamming distance is at most k. Where the Hamming distance is greater than k at some alignment of the pattern and text, we simply output "No". We study this problem in both the standard offline setting and also as a streaming problem. In the streaming k-mismatch problem the text arrives one symbol at a time and we must give an output before processing any future symbols. Our main results are as follows: 1) Our first result is a deterministic $O(n k^2\log{k} / m+n \text{polylog} m)$ time offline algorithm for k-mismatch on a text of length n. This is a factor of k improvement over the fastest previous result of this form from SODA 2000 by Amihood Amir et al. 2) We then give a randomised and online algorithm which runs in the same time complexity but requires only $O(k^2\text{polylog} {m})$ space in total. 3) Next we give a randomised $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the streaming k-mismatch problem which uses $O(k^2\text{polylog} m / \epsilon^2)$ space and runs in $O(\text{polylog} m / \epsilon^2)$ worst-case time per arriving symbol. 4) Finally we combine our new results to derive a randomised $O(k^2\text{polylog} {m})$ space algorithm for the streaming k-mismatch problem which runs in $O(\sqrt{k}\log{k} + \text{polylog} {m})$ worst-case time per arriving symbol. This improves the best previous space complexity for streaming k-mismatch from FOCS 2009 by Benny Porat and Ely Porat by a factor of k. We also improve the time complexity of this previous result by an even greater factor to match the fastest known offline algorithm (up to logarithmic factors)