1,143 research outputs found

    Stategic Candidacy with Keen Candidates

    Get PDF
    Presented at the Games, Agents and Incentives WorkshopIn strategic candidacy games, both voters and candidates have preferences over the set of candidates, and candidates make strategic decisions about whether to run an electoral campaign or withdraw from the election, in order to manipulate the outcome according to their preferences. In this work, we extend the standard model of strategic candidacy games to scenarios where candidates may find it harmful for their reputation to withdraw from the election and would only do so if their withdrawal changes the election outcome for the better; otherwise, they would be keen to run the campaign. We study the existence and the quality of Nash equilibria in the resulting class of games, both analytically and empirically, and compare them with the Nash equilibria of the standard model. Our results demonstrate that while in the worst case there may be none or multiple, bad quality equilibria, on average, these games have a unique, optimal equilibrium state

    Mirror - Vol. 26, No. 20 - April 05, 2001

    Get PDF
    The Mirror (sometimes called the Fairfield Mirror) is the official student newspaper of Fairfield University, and is published weekly during the academic year (September - May). It runs from 1977 - the present; current issues are available online.https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/archives-mirror/1545/thumbnail.jp

    Daily Eastern News: September 26, 1977

    Get PDF
    https://thekeep.eiu.edu/den_1977_sep/1015/thumbnail.jp

    Daily Eastern News: September 26, 1977

    Get PDF
    https://thekeep.eiu.edu/den_1977_sep/1015/thumbnail.jp

    Daily Eastern News: September 26, 1977

    Get PDF
    https://thekeep.eiu.edu/den_1977_sep/1015/thumbnail.jp

    Higher degree research by numbers: beyond the critiques of neo-liberalism

    Full text link
    © 2017 HERDSA. This article argues that strong theories of neo-liberalism do not provide an adequate frame for understanding the ways that measurement practices come to be embedded in the life-worlds of those working in higher education. We argue that neo-liberal metrics need to be understood from the viewpoint of their social usage, alongside other practices of qualification and quantification. In particular, this article maps the specific variables attending measurement in higher degree research programmes, as the key sites that familiarize students with measurement practices around research and teaching. With regard to the incremental reframing of doctoral study as a utilitarian pursuit, we suggest a need to better identify the singular and immeasurable features of long-term research projects, and argue for a revitalized notion of failure. In this context, this article suggests that many critiques of neo-liberalism do not sufficiently advance alternative ways to think about the purposes and limitations of higher education
    corecore