243 research outputs found
A statistical model for brain networks inferred from large-scale electrophysiological signals
Network science has been extensively developed to characterize structural
properties of complex systems, including brain networks inferred from
neuroimaging data. As a result of the inference process, networks estimated
from experimentally obtained biological data, represent one instance of a
larger number of realizations with similar intrinsic topology. A modeling
approach is therefore needed to support statistical inference on the bottom-up
local connectivity mechanisms influencing the formation of the estimated brain
networks. We adopted a statistical model based on exponential random graphs
(ERGM) to reproduce brain networks, or connectomes, estimated by spectral
coherence between high-density electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. We
validated this approach in a dataset of 108 healthy subjects during eyes-open
(EO) and eyes-closed (EC) resting-state conditions. Results showed that the
tendency to form triangles and stars, reflecting clustering and node
centrality, better explained the global properties of the EEG connectomes as
compared to other combinations of graph metrics. Synthetic networks generated
by this model configuration replicated the characteristic differences found in
brain networks, with EO eliciting significantly higher segregation in the alpha
frequency band (8-13 Hz) as compared to EC. Furthermore, the fitted ERGM
parameter values provided complementary information showing that clustering
connections are significantly more represented from EC to EO in the alpha
range, but also in the beta band (14-29 Hz), which is known to play a crucial
role in cortical processing of visual input and externally oriented attention.
These findings support the current view of the brain functional segregation and
integration in terms of modules and hubs, and provide a statistical approach to
extract new information on the (re)organizational mechanisms in healthy and
diseased brains.Comment: Due to the limitation "The abstract field cannot be longer than 1,920
characters", the abstract appearing here is slightly shorter than that in the
PDF fil
Metrics for Graph Comparison: A Practitioner's Guide
Comparison of graph structure is a ubiquitous task in data analysis and
machine learning, with diverse applications in fields such as neuroscience,
cyber security, social network analysis, and bioinformatics, among others.
Discovery and comparison of structures such as modular communities, rich clubs,
hubs, and trees in data in these fields yields insight into the generative
mechanisms and functional properties of the graph.
Often, two graphs are compared via a pairwise distance measure, with a small
distance indicating structural similarity and vice versa. Common choices
include spectral distances (also known as distances) and distances
based on node affinities. However, there has of yet been no comparative study
of the efficacy of these distance measures in discerning between common graph
topologies and different structural scales.
In this work, we compare commonly used graph metrics and distance measures,
and demonstrate their ability to discern between common topological features
found in both random graph models and empirical datasets. We put forward a
multi-scale picture of graph structure, in which the effect of global and local
structure upon the distance measures is considered. We make recommendations on
the applicability of different distance measures to empirical graph data
problem based on this multi-scale view. Finally, we introduce the Python
library NetComp which implements the graph distances used in this work
A morphospace of functional configuration to assess configural breadth based on brain functional networks
The best approach to quantify human brain functional reconfigurations in
response to varying cognitive demands remains an unresolved topic in network
neuroscience. We propose that such functional reconfigurations may be
categorized into three different types: i) Network Configural Breadth, ii)
Task-to-Task transitional reconfiguration, and iii) Within-Task
reconfiguration. In order to quantify these reconfigurations, we propose a
mesoscopic framework focused on functional networks (FNs) or communities. To do
so, we introduce a 2D network morphospace that relies on two novel mesoscopic
metrics, Trapping Efficiency (TE) and Exit Entropy (EE), which capture topology
and integration of information within and between a reference set of FNs. In
this study, we use this framework to quantify the Network Configural Breadth
across different tasks. We show that the metrics defining this morphospace can
differentiate FNs, cognitive tasks and subjects. We also show that network
configural breadth significantly predicts behavioral measures, such as episodic
memory, verbal episodic memory, fluid intelligence and general intelligence. In
essence, we put forth a framework to explore the cognitive space in a
comprehensive manner, for each individual separately, and at different levels
of granularity. This tool that can also quantify the FN reconfigurations that
result from the brain switching between mental states.Comment: main article: 24 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables. supporting information:
11 pages, 5 figure
The specificity and robustness of long-distance connections in weighted, interareal connectomes
Brain areas' functional repertoires are shaped by their incoming and outgoing
structural connections. In empirically measured networks, most connections are
short, reflecting spatial and energetic constraints. Nonetheless, a small
number of connections span long distances, consistent with the notion that the
functionality of these connections must outweigh their cost. While the precise
function of these long-distance connections is not known, the leading
hypothesis is that they act to reduce the topological distance between brain
areas and facilitate efficient interareal communication. However, this
hypothesis implies a non-specificity of long-distance connections that we
contend is unlikely. Instead, we propose that long-distance connections serve
to diversify brain areas' inputs and outputs, thereby promoting complex
dynamics. Through analysis of five interareal network datasets, we show that
long-distance connections play only minor roles in reducing average interareal
topological distance. In contrast, areas' long-distance and short-range
neighbors exhibit marked differences in their connectivity profiles, suggesting
that long-distance connections enhance dissimilarity between regional inputs
and outputs. Next, we show that -- in isolation -- areas' long-distance
connectivity profiles exhibit non-random levels of similarity, suggesting that
the communication pathways formed by long connections exhibit redundancies that
may serve to promote robustness. Finally, we use a linearization of
Wilson-Cowan dynamics to simulate the covariance structure of neural activity
and show that in the absence of long-distance connections, a common measure of
functional diversity decreases. Collectively, our findings suggest that
long-distance connections are necessary for supporting diverse and complex
brain dynamics.Comment: 18 pages, 8 figure
- …