28,540 research outputs found

    Learning signals of adverse drug-drug interactions from the unstructured text of electronic health records.

    Get PDF
    Drug-drug interactions (DDI) account for 30% of all adverse drug reactions, which are the fourth leading cause of death in the US. Current methods for post marketing surveillance primarily use spontaneous reporting systems for learning DDI signals and validate their signals using the structured portions of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). We demonstrate a fast, annotation-based approach, which uses standard odds ratios for identifying signals of DDIs from the textual portion of EHRs directly and which, to our knowledge, is the first effort of its kind. We developed a gold standard of 1,120 DDIs spanning 14 adverse events and 1,164 drugs. Our evaluations on this gold standard using millions of clinical notes from the Stanford Hospital confirm that identifying DDI signals from clinical text is feasible (AUROC=81.5%). We conclude that the text in EHRs contain valuable information for learning DDI signals and has enormous utility in drug surveillance and clinical decision support

    Chapter Evolving Roles of Spontaneous Reporting Systems to Assess and Monitor Drug Safety

    Get PDF
    This chapter aims to describe current and emerging roles of spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) for assessing and monitoring drug safety. Moreover, it offers a perspective on the near future, which entails the so-called era of Big Data, keeping in mind both regulator and researcher viewpoints. After a panorama on key data sources and analyses of post-marketing data of adverse drug reactions, a critical appraisal of methodological issues and debated future applications of SRSs will be presented, including the exploitation and challenges in evidence integration (i.e., merging and combining heterogeneous sources of data into a unique indicator of risk) and patientโ€™s reporting via social media. Finally, a call for a responsible use of these studies is offered, with a proposal on a set of minimum requirements to assess the quality of disproportionality analysis in terms of study conception, performing and reporting

    Evolving Roles of Spontaneous Reporting Systems to Assess and Monitor Drug Safety

    Get PDF
    This chapter aims to describe current and emerging roles of spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) for assessing and monitoring drug safety. Moreover, it offers a perspective on the near future, which entails the so-called era of Big Data, keeping in mind both regulator and researcher viewpoints. After a panorama on key data sources and analyses of post-marketing data of adverse drug reactions, a critical appraisal of methodological issues and debated future applications of SRSs will be presented, including the exploitation and challenges in evidence integration (i.e., merging and combining heterogeneous sources of data into a unique indicator of risk) and patientโ€™s reporting via social media. Finally, a call for a responsible use of these studies is offered, with a proposal on a set of minimum requirements to assess the quality of disproportionality analysis in terms of study conception, performing and reporting

    Good Signal Detection Practices: Evidence from IMI PROTECT

    Get PDF

    A Simulation-based Comparison of Drug-Drug Interaction Signal Detection Methods

    Get PDF
    Many studies have proposed methods to detect adverse drug reactions induced by taking two drugs together. These suspected adverse drug reactions can be discovered through post-market drug safety surveillance. Post-market drug safety surveillance relies on spontaneous reporting data including ADR reports and prescription information. Most previous studies have applied statistical models to real world data and compared the performance. In this article, we assess the performance of various detection methods by implementing simulations under various conditions. This allows us to determine which situation each of the methods is most useful for. In addition, we summarize and generalize the characteristics of each method. ๋งŽ์€ ์„ ํ–‰์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์„ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋ณต์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์˜์‹ฌ๋˜๋Š” ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ์‹œํŒ ํ›„ ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ฐ์‹œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œํŒ ํ›„ ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ ์•ˆ์ „ ๊ฐ์‹œ๋Š” ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ ๋ณด๊ณ ์™€ ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ์ •๋ณด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋ฐœ์  ๋ณด๊ณ  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์•ฝ๋ฌผ๊ฐ„ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ํƒ์ง€๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์„ ํ–‰ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ž๋ฐœ์  ๋ณด๊ณ  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑดํ•˜์—์„œ ์‹œ๋ฌผ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์š”์•ฝํ•˜๊ณ  ์–ด๋–ค ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ์ง€ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.open์„

    Discovering Drug-Drug Interactions Using Association Rule Mining from Electronic Health Records

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we propose utilising Electronic Health Records (EHR) to discover previously unknown drug-drug interactions (DDI) that may result in high rates of hospital readmissions. We used association rule mining and categorised drug combinations as high or low risk based on the adverse events they caused. We demonstrate that the drug combinations in the high-risk group contain significantly more drug-drug interactions than those in the low-risk group. This approach is efficient for discovering potential drug interactions that lead to negative outcomes, thus should be given priority and evaluated in clinical trials. In fact, severe drug interactions can have life-threatening consequences and result in adverse clinical outcomes. Our findings were achieved using a new association rule metric, which better accounts for the adverse drug events caused by DDI
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore