Static Scheduling for Barrier MIMD Architectures

Barrier MIMDs are asynchronous Multiple Instruction stream Multiple Data stream architectures capable of parallel execution of variable-execution-time instructions and arbitrary control flow (e.g., w h ile loops and calls); however, they differ from conventional MIMDs in that the need for run-time synchronization is significantly reduced. Whenever a group of processors within a barrier MIMD encounters a synchronization point (barrier), static timing constraints become precise, hence, conceptual synchronizations between the processors often can be statically resolved with zero cost — as in a SIMD or VLIW and using similar compiler technology. Unlike these machines, however, as execution continues past the synchronization point the accuracy within which the compiler can track the relative timing between processors is reduced. Where this imprecision becomes too large, the compiler simply inserts a synchronization barrier to insure that timing imprecision at that point is zero, and again employs static, implicit synchronization. This paper describes new scheduling and barrier placement algorithms for barrier MIMDs that are based loosely on the list scheduling approach employed for VLIWs [Elli85]. In addition, the experimental results from scheduling more than 3500 synthetic benchmark programs for a parameterized barrier MIMD machine are presented

Percolation scheduling for non-VLIW machines

Percolation Scheduling, a technique for compile-time code parallelization, has proven very successful for exploiting fine-grain irregular parallelism in ordinary programs. Currently, this technology is targeted only to VLIW (Very Long Instruction Word) machines, which have the advantages of 'free' synchronization and communication. Shared memory multi-processors can simulate the execution characteristics of VLIW machines with the use of static barriers. Preliminary results show that Percolation Scheduling can be used with good results on this type of architecture by increasing the granularity from operation level to source statement level, removing any redundant synchronization, and providing an efficient implementation of multi-way jumps

Extending Static Synchronization Beyond SIMD and VLIW

A key advantage of SIMD (Single Instruction stream, Multiple Data stream) architectures is that synchronization is effected statically at compile-time, hence the execution-time cost of synchronization between “processes” is essentially zero. VLIW (Very Long Instruction Word) machines are successful in large part because they preserve this property while providing more flexibility in terms of what kinds of operations can be parallelized. In this paper, we propose a new kind of architecture —- the “static barrier MIMD” or SBM — which can be viewed as a further generalization of the parallel execution abilities of static synchronization machines. Barrier MIMDs are asynchronous Multiple Instruction stream Multiple Data stream architectures capable of parallel execution of loops, subprogram calls, and variable execution- time instructions; however, little or no run-time synchronization is needed. When a group of processors within a barrier MIMD has just encountered a barrier, any conceptual synchronizations between the processors are statically accomplished with zero cost — as in a SIMD or VLIW and using similar compiler technology. Unlike these machines, however, as execution continues the relative timing of processors may become less precisely knowable as a static, compile-time, quantity. Where this imprecision becomes too large, the compiler simply inserts a synchronization barrier to insure that timing imprecision at that point is zero, and again employs purely static, implicit, synchronization. Both the architecture and the supporting compiler technology are discussed in detail

Hardware Barrier Synchronization: Static Barrier MIMD (SBM)

In this paper, we give the design, and performance analysis, of a new, highly efficient, synchronization mechanism called “Static Barrier MIMD” or “SBM.” Unlike traditional barrier synchronization, the proposed barriers are designed to facilitate the use of static (compile-time) code scheduling for eliminating some synchronizations. For this reason, our barrier hardware is more general than most hardware barrier mechanisms, allowing any subset of the processors to participate in each barrier. Since code scheduling typically operates on fine-grain parallelism, it is also vital that barriers be able to execute in a small number of clock ticks. The SBM is actually only one of two new classes of barrier machines proposed to facilitate static code scheduling; the other architecture is the “Dynamic Barrier MIMD,” or “DBM,” which is described in a companion paper1. The DBM differs from the SBM in that the DBM employs more complex hardware to make the system less dependent on the precision of the static analysis and code scheduling; for example, an SBM cannot efficiently manage simultaneous execution of independent parallel programs, whereas a DBM can

Loop Coalescing and Scheduling for Barrier MIMD Architectures

Barrier MIMDs are asynchronous Multiple Instruction stream Multiple Data stream architectures capable of parallel execution of variable execution time instructions and arbitrary control flow (e.g., while loops and calls); however, they differ from conventional MlMDs in that the need for run-time synchronization is significantly reduced. This work considers the problem of scheduling nested loop structures on a barrier MIMD. The basic approach employs loop coalescing, a technique for transforming a multiply-nested loop into a single loop. Loop coalescing is extended to nested triangular loops, in which inner loop bounds are functions of outer loop indices. Also, a more efficient scheme to generate the original loop indices from the coalesced index is proposed for the case of constant loop bounds. These results are general, and can be applied to extend previous work using loop coalescing techniques. We concentrate on using loop coalescing for scheduling barrier MIMDs, and show how previous work in loop transformations [Wol89], [Pol88] and linear scheduling theory [ShF88], rShO901 cart be applied to this problem

Architecture independent environment for developing engineering software on MIMD computers

Engineers are constantly faced with solving problems of increasing complexity and detail. Multiple Instruction stream Multiple Data stream (MIMD) computers have been developed to overcome the performance limitations of serial computers. The hardware architectures of MIMD computers vary considerably and are much more sophisticated than serial computers. Developing large scale software for a variety of MIMD computers is difficult and expensive. There is a need to provide tools that facilitate programming these machines. First, the issues that must be considered to develop those tools are examined. The two main areas of concern were architecture independence and data management. Architecture independent software facilitates software portability and improves the longevity and utility of the software product. It provides some form of insurance for the investment of time and effort that goes into developing the software. The management of data is a crucial aspect of solving large engineering problems. It must be considered in light of the new hardware organizations that are available. Second, the functional design and implementation of a software environment that facilitates developing architecture independent software for large engineering applications are described. The topics of discussion include: a description of the model that supports the development of architecture independent software; identifying and exploiting concurrency within the application program; data coherence; engineering data base and memory management

Reading list of selected PASM-related publications

Prepared for a chapter to be published in the forthcoming Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing by Springer Publishing Company. The Encyclopedia will contain a broad coverage of the field and will include entries on machine organization, programming, algorithms, and applications. The broad coverage, together with extensive pointers to the literature for in-depth study, is expected to make the Encyclopedia a useful reference tool in parallel computing

Compiler-Driven Reconfiguration of Multiprocessors

Hussmann M, Thies M, Kastens U, Purnaprajna M, Porrmann M, Rückert U. Compiler-Driven Reconfiguration of Multiprocessors. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Application Specific Processors (WASP) 2007. 2007.Multiprocessors enable parallel execution of a single large application to achieve a performance improvement. An application is split at instruction, data or task level (based on the granularity), such that the overhead of partitioning is minimal. Parallelization for multiprocessors is mostly restricted to a fixed granularity. Reconfiguration enables architectural variations to allow multiple granularities of operation within a multiprocessor. This adaptability optimizes resource utilization over a fixed organization. Here, a unified hardware-software approach to design a reconfigurable multiprocessor system called QuadroCore is presented. In our holistic methodology, compiler-driven reconfiguration selects from a fixed set of modes. Each mode relies on matching program analysis to exploit the architecture efficiently. For instance, a multiprocessor may adapt to different parallelization paradigms. The compiler can determine the best execution mode for each piece of code by analyzing the parallelism in a program. A fast, singlecycle, run-time reconfiguration between these predetermined modes is enabled by executing special instructions which switch coarse-grained components like instruction decoders, ALUs and register banks. Performance is evaluated in terms of execution cycles and achieved clock frequency. First results indicate suitability especially in audio and video processing applications

A Massively Parallel MIMD Implemented by SIMD Hardware?

Both conventional wisdom and engineering practice hold that a massively parallel MIMD machine should be constructed using a large number of independent processors and an asynchronous interconnection network. In this paper, we suggest that it may be beneficial to implement a massively parallel MIMD using microcode on a massively parallel SIMD microengine; the synchronous nature of the system allows much higher performance to be obtained with simpler hardware. The primary disadvantage is simply that the SIMD microengine must serialize execution of different types of instructions - but again the static nature of the machine allows various optimizations that can minimize this detrimental effect. In addition to presenting the theory behind construction of efficient MIMD machines using SIMD microengines, this paper discusses how the techniques were applied to create a 16,384- processor shared memory barrier MIMD using a SIMD MasPar MP-1. Both the MIMD structure and benchmark results are presented. Even though the MasPar hardware is not ideal for implementing a MIMD and our microinterpreter was written in a high-level language (MPL), peak MIMD performance was 280 MFLOPS as compared to 1.2 GFLOPS for the native SIMD instruction set. Of course, comparing peak speeds is of dubious value; hence, we have also included a number of more realistic benchmark results

pocl: A Performance-Portable OpenCL Implementation

OpenCL is a standard for parallel programming of heterogeneous systems. The benefits of a common programming standard are clear; multiple vendors can provide support for application descriptions written according to the standard, thus reducing the program porting effort. While the standard brings the obvious benefits of platform portability, the performance portability aspects are largely left to the programmer. The situation is made worse due to multiple proprietary vendor implementations with different characteristics, and, thus, required optimization strategies. In this paper, we propose an OpenCL implementation that is both portable and performance portable. At its core is a kernel compiler that can be used to exploit the data parallelism of OpenCL programs on multiple platforms with different parallel hardware styles. The kernel compiler is modularized to perform target-independent parallel region formation separately from the target-specific parallel mapping of the regions to enable support for various styles of fine-grained parallel resources such as subword SIMD extensions, SIMD datapaths and static multi-issue. Unlike previous similar techniques that work on the source level, the parallel region formation retains the information of the data parallelism using the LLVM IR and its metadata infrastructure. This data can be exploited by the later generic compiler passes for efficient parallelization. The proposed open source implementation of OpenCL is also platform portable, enabling OpenCL on a wide range of architectures, both already commercialized and on those that are still under research. The paper describes how the portability of the implementation is achieved. Our results show that most of the benchmarked applications when compiled using pocl were faster or close to as fast as the best proprietary OpenCL implementation for the platform at hand.Comment: This article was published in 2015; it is now openly accessible via arxi