축차 비교형 아날로그-디지털 변환기의 성능 향상을 위한 기법에 대한 연구

학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 전기·컴퓨터공학부, 2016. 8. 김수환.This thesis is written about a performance enhancement technique for the successive-approximation-register analog-to-digital converter (SAR ADC). More specifically, it focuses on improving the resolution of the SAR ADC. The basic operation principles and the architecture of the conventional SAR ADC is examined. To gain insight on areas of improvement, a deeper look is taken at the building components of the SAR ADC. Design considerations of these components are discussed, along with the performance limiting factors in the resolution and bandwidth domains. Prior works which challenge these problems in order to improve the performance of the SAR ADC are presented. To design SAR ADCs, a high-level modeling is presented. This model includes various non-ideal effects that occur in the design and operation. Simulation examples are shown how the model is efficient and useful in the initial top-level designing of the SAR ADC. Then, the thesis proposes a technique that can enhance the resolution. The SAR ADC using integer-based capacitor digital-to-analog converter (CDAC) exploiting redundancy is presented. This technique improves the mismatch problem that arises with the widely used split-capacitor structure in the CDAC of the SAR ADC. Unlike prior works, there is no additional overhead of additional calibration circuits or reference voltages. A prototype SAR ADC which uses the integer-based CDAC exploiting redundancy is designed for automotive applications. Measurement results show a resolution level of 12 bits even without any form of calibration. Finally, the conclusion about the operation and effectiveness on the proposed technique is drawn.CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 MOTIVATION 1 1.2 THESIS ORGANIZATION 5 CHAPTER 2 CONVENTIONAL SUCCESSIVE-APPROXIMATION-REGISTER ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTERS 7 2.1 INTRODUCTION 7 2.2 OPERATION PRINCIPLE OF THE CONVENTIONAL SAR ADC 8 2.2.1. OVERVIEW OF THE OPERATION 8 2.2.2. SAMPLING PHASE 10 2.2.3. CONVERSION PHASE 11 2.3 STRUCTURE OF THE CONVENTIONAL SAR ADC 15 2.3.1. FULL STRUCTURE OF THE CONVENTIONAL SAR ADC 15 2.3.2. CAPACITOR DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER (CDAC) 17 2.3.3. COMPARATOR 21 2.3.4. CONTROL LOGIC 23 2.4 PERFORMANCE LIMITING FACTORS 24 2.4.1. RESOLUTION LIMITING FACTORS 24 2.4.2. OPERATION BANDWIDTH LIMITING FACTORS 28 2.5 PRIOR WORK 30 2.5.1. INTRODUCTION 30 2.5.2. SPLIT-CAPACITOR STRUCTURE OF THE CDAC 31 2.5.3. REDUNDANCY AND CDAC WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION 33 2.5.4. ASYNCHRONOUS CONTROL LOGIC 36 2.5.5. CALIBRATION TECHNIQUES 37 2.5.4. DOUBLE-SAMPLING TECHNIQUE FOR SAMPLING TIME REDUCTION 38 2.5.6. TWO-COMPARATOR ARCHITECTURE FOR COMPARATOR DECISION TIME REDUCTION 40 2.5.7. MAJORITY VOTING FOR RESOLUTION ENHANCEMENT 41 CHAPTER 3 MODELING OF THE SAR ADC 43 3.1 INTRODUCTION 43 3.2 WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF THE CAPACITOR DAC AND REDUNDANCY 44 3.3 SPLIT-CAPACITOR ARRAY TECHNIQUE 47 3.4 PARASITIC EFFECTS OF THE CAPACITOR DAC 48 3.5 MISMATCH MODEL OF THE CAPACITOR DAC 51 3.6 SETTLING ERROR OF THE DAC 53 3.7 COMPARATOR DECISION ERROR 58 3.8 DIGITAL ERROR CORRECTION 59 CHAPTER 4 SAR ADC WITH INTEGER-BASED SPLIT-CDAC EXPLOITING REDUNDANCY FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS 60 4.1 INTRODUCTION 60 4.2 MOTIVATION 61 4.3 PRIOR WORK ON RESOLVING THE SPLIT-CAPACITOR CDAC MISMATCH FOR THE SAR ADC 64 4.3.1. CONVENTIONAL SPLIT-CAPACITOR CDAC FOR THE SAR ADC 64 4.3.2. SPLITTING THE LAST STAGE OF THE LSB-SIDE OF THE CDAC 66 4.3.3. CALIBRATION OF THE NON-INTEGER MULTIPLE BRIDGE CAPACITOR 67 4.3.4. INTEGER-MULTIPLE BRIDGE CAPACITOR WITH LSB-SIDE CAPACITOR ARRAY CALIBRATION 68 4.3.5. OVERSIZED BRIDGE CAPACITOR WITH ADDITIONAL FRACTIONAL REFERENCE VOLTAGE 69 4.4 PROPOSED INTEGER-BASED CDAC EXPLOITING REDUNDANCY FOR THE SAR ADC 70 4.5 CIRCUIT DESIGN 72 4.5.1. PROPOSED INTEGER-BASED CDAC EXPLOITING REDUNDANCY FOR SAR ADC 72 4.5.2. COMPARATOR 74 4.5.3. CONTROL LOGIC 75 4.6 IMPLEMENTATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 76 4.6.1. LAYOUT 76 4.6.2. MEASUREMENT RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 82 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK 86 5.1 CONCLUSION 86 5.2 FUTURE WORK 87 APPENDIX. SAR ADC USING THRESHOLD-CONFIGURING COMPARATOR FOR ULTRASOUND IMAGING SYSTEMS 89 BIBLIOGRAPHY 120Docto

Exploiting smallest error to calibrate non-linearity in SAR ADCs

This paper presents a statistics-optimised organisation technique to achieve better element matching in Successive Approximation Register (SAR) Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) in smart sensor systems. We demonstrate the proposed technique ability to achieve a significant improvement of around 23 dB on Spurious Free Dynamic Range (SFDR) of the ADC than the conventional, testing with a capacitor mismatch σu = 0.2% in a 14 bit SAR ADC system. For the static performance, the max root mean square (rms) value of differential nonlinearity (DNL) reduces from 1.63 to 0.20 LSB and the max rms value of integral nonlinearity (INL) reduces from 2.10 to 0.21 LSB. In addition, it is demonstrated that by applying grouping optimisation and strategy optimisation, the performance boosting on SFDR can be effectively achieved. Such great improvement on the resolution of the ADC only requires an off-line pre-processing digital part

Fundamental Power Limits of SAR and ΔΣ Analog-to-Digital Converters

This work aims at estimating and comparing the power limits of ΔΣ and charge-redistribution successiveapproximation register (CR-SAR) analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), in order to identify which topology is the most powerefficient for a target resolution. A power consumption model for mismatch-limited SAR ADCs and for discrete-time (DT) ΔΣ modulators is presented and validated against experimental data. SAR ADCs are found to be the best choice for low-to-medium resolutions, up to roughly 80 dB of dynamic range (DR). At high resolutions, on the other hand, ΔΣ modulators become more power-efficient. This is due to the intrinsic robustness of the ΔΣ modulation principle against circuit imperfections and nonidealities. Furthermore, a comparison of the area occupation of such topologies reveals that, at high resolutions and for a given dynamic range, ΔΣ ADCs result more area-efficient as well