472,297 research outputs found

    Speed-scaling with no Preemptions

    Full text link
    We revisit the non-preemptive speed-scaling problem, in which a set of jobs have to be executed on a single or a set of parallel speed-scalable processor(s) between their release dates and deadlines so that the energy consumption to be minimized. We adopt the speed-scaling mechanism first introduced in [Yao et al., FOCS 1995] according to which the power dissipated is a convex function of the processor's speed. Intuitively, the higher is the speed of a processor, the higher is the energy consumption. For the single-processor case, we improve the best known approximation algorithm by providing a (1+ϵ)αB~α(1+\epsilon)^{\alpha}\tilde{B}_{\alpha}-approximation algorithm, where B~α\tilde{B}_{\alpha} is a generalization of the Bell number. For the multiprocessor case, we present an approximation algorithm of ratio B~α((1+ϵ)(1+wmaxwmin))α\tilde{B}_{\alpha}((1+\epsilon)(1+\frac{w_{\max}}{w_{\min}}))^{\alpha} improving the best known result by a factor of (52)α1(wmaxwmin)α(\frac{5}{2})^{\alpha-1}(\frac{w_{\max}}{w_{\min}})^{\alpha}. Notice that our result holds for the fully heterogeneous environment while the previous known result holds only in the more restricted case of parallel processors with identical power functions

    Power-Aware Speed Scaling in Processor Sharing Systems

    Get PDF
    Energy use of computer communication systems has quickly become a vital design consideration. One effective method for reducing energy consumption is dynamic speed scaling, which adapts the processing speed to the current load. This paper studies how to optimally scale speed to balance mean response time and mean energy consumption under processor sharing scheduling. Both bounds and asymptotics for the optimal speed scaling scheme are provided. These results show that a simple scheme that halts when the system is idle and uses a static rate while the system is busy provides nearly the same performance as the optimal dynamic speed scaling. However, the results also highlight that dynamic speed scaling provides at least one key benefit - significantly improved robustness to bursty traffic and mis-estimation of workload parameters

    Stochastic Analysis of Power-Aware Scheduling

    Get PDF
    Energy consumption in a computer system can be reduced by dynamic speed scaling, which adapts the processing speed to the current load. This paper studies the optimal way to adjust speed to balance mean response time and mean energy consumption, when jobs arrive as a Poisson process and processor sharing scheduling is used. Both bounds and asymptotics for the optimal speeds are provided. Interestingly, a simple scheme that halts when the system is idle and uses a static rate while the system is busy provides nearly the same performance as the optimal dynamic speed scaling. However, dynamic speed scaling which allocates a higher speed when more jobs are present significantly improves robustness to bursty traffic and mis-estimation of workload parameters

    Throughput Maximization in Multiprocessor Speed-Scaling

    Full text link
    We are given a set of nn jobs that have to be executed on a set of mm speed-scalable machines that can vary their speeds dynamically using the energy model introduced in [Yao et al., FOCS'95]. Every job jj is characterized by its release date rjr_j, its deadline djd_j, its processing volume pi,jp_{i,j} if jj is executed on machine ii and its weight wjw_j. We are also given a budget of energy EE and our objective is to maximize the weighted throughput, i.e. the total weight of jobs that are completed between their respective release dates and deadlines. We propose a polynomial-time approximation algorithm where the preemption of the jobs is allowed but not their migration. Our algorithm uses a primal-dual approach on a linearized version of a convex program with linear constraints. Furthermore, we present two optimal algorithms for the non-preemptive case where the number of machines is bounded by a fixed constant. More specifically, we consider: {\em (a)} the case of identical processing volumes, i.e. pi,j=pp_{i,j}=p for every ii and jj, for which we present a polynomial-time algorithm for the unweighted version, which becomes a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm for the weighted throughput version, and {\em (b)} the case of agreeable instances, i.e. for which rirjr_i \le r_j if and only if didjd_i \le d_j, for which we present a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm. Both algorithms are based on a discretization of the problem and the use of dynamic programming

    Throughput Maximization in the Speed-Scaling Setting

    Get PDF
    We are given a set of nn jobs and a single processor that can vary its speed dynamically. Each job JjJ_j is characterized by its processing requirement (work) pjp_j, its release date rjr_j and its deadline djd_j. We are also given a budget of energy EE and we study the scheduling problem of maximizing the throughput (i.e. the number of jobs which are completed on time). We propose a dynamic programming algorithm that solves the preemptive case of the problem, i.e. when the execution of the jobs may be interrupted and resumed later, in pseudo-polynomial time. Our algorithm can be adapted for solving the weighted version of the problem where every job is associated with a weight wjw_j and the objective is the maximization of the sum of the weights of the jobs that are completed on time. Moreover, we provide a strongly polynomial time algorithm to solve the non-preemptive unweighed case when the jobs have the same processing requirements. For the weighted case, our algorithm can be adapted for solving the non-preemptive version of the problem in pseudo-polynomial time.Comment: submitted to SODA 201

    Morphology Scaling of Drop Impact onto a Granular Layer

    Full text link
    We investigate the impact of a free-falling water drop onto a granular layer. First, we constructed a phase diagram of crater shapes with two control parameters, impact speed and grain size. A low-speed impact makes a deeper cylindrical crater in a fluffy granular target. After high-speed impacts, we observed a convex bump higher than the initial surface level instead of a crater. The inner ring can be also observed in medium impact speed regime. Quantitatively, we found a scaling law for crater radius with a dimensionless number consisting of impact speed and density ratio between the bulk granular layer and water drop. This scaling demonstrates that the water drop deformation is crucial to understand the crater morphology.Comment: 4 pages, 4 figure

    Energy-efficient algorithms for non-preemptive speed-scaling

    Full text link
    We improve complexity bounds for energy-efficient speed scheduling problems for both the single processor and multi-processor cases. Energy conservation has become a major concern, so revisiting traditional scheduling problems to take into account the energy consumption has been part of the agenda of the scheduling community for the past few years. We consider the energy minimizing speed scaling problem introduced by Yao et al. where we wish to schedule a set of jobs, each with a release date, deadline and work volume, on a set of identical processors. The processors may change speed as a function of time and the energy they consume is the α\alphath power of its speed. The objective is then to find a feasible schedule which minimizes the total energy used. We show that in the setting with an arbitrary number of processors where all work volumes are equal, there is a 2(1+ε)(5(1+ε))α1B~α=Oα(1)2(1+\varepsilon)(5(1+\varepsilon))^{\alpha -1}\tilde{B}_{\alpha}=O_{\alpha}(1) approximation algorithm, where B~α\tilde{B}_{\alpha} is the generalized Bell number. This is the first constant factor algorithm for this problem. This algorithm extends to general unequal processor-dependent work volumes, up to losing a factor of ((1+r)r2)α(\frac{(1+r)r}{2})^{\alpha} in the approximation, where rr is the maximum ratio between two work volumes. We then show this latter problem is APX-hard, even in the special case when all release dates and deadlines are equal and rr is 4. In the single processor case, we introduce a new linear programming formulation of speed scaling and prove that its integrality gap is at most 12α112^{\alpha -1}. As a corollary, we obtain a (12(1+ε))α1(12(1+\varepsilon))^{\alpha -1} approximation algorithm where there is a single processor, improving on the previous best bound of 2α1(1+ε)αB~α2^{\alpha-1}(1+\varepsilon)^{\alpha}\tilde{B}_{\alpha} when α25\alpha \ge 25
    corecore