Mightyl: A compositional translation from mitl to timed automata

Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL) was first proposed in the early 1990s as a specification formalism for real-time systems. Apart from its appealing intuitive syntax, there are also theoretical evidences that make MITL a prime real-time counterpart of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). Unfortunately, the tool support for MITL verification is still lacking to this day. In this paper, we propose a new construction from MITL to timed automata via very-weak one-clock alternating timed automata. Our construction subsumes the well-known construction from LTL to Büchi automata by Gastin and Oddoux and yet has the additional benefits of being compositional and integrating easily with existing tools. We implement the construction in our new tool MightyL and report on experiments using Uppaal and LTSmin as back-ends

Constructing an Interval Temporal Logic for Real-Time Systems

A real-time system is one that involves control of one or more physical devices with essential timing requirements. Examples of these systems are command and control systems, process control systems, flight control systems, and the space shuttle avionics systems. The characteristics of these systems are that severe consequences will occur if the logical and physical timing specifications of the systems are not met. Formal specification and verification are among the techniques to achieve reliable software for real-time systems, in which testing may be impossible or too dangerous to perform. This paper presents a modal logic, Interval Temporal , built upon a classical predicate logic In this logic system, we consider formulas that can be used to reason about timing properties of systems, in particular, responsiveness assertions. A responsiveness assertion describes constraints that a program must satisfy within an interval. Thus, it can be utilized to characterize behaviors of life-critical systems. We assume that a program P can be identified with a theory, a collection of formulas characterizing sequences of states of P with arbitrary initial states. In the following, we describe syntax and semantics of the logic, present a proof rule for responsiveness assertions, and show soundness and relative completeness of responsiveness assertions that we consider. There are other approaches to build temporal logics for real-time systems, which are included in bibliography

Ensuring the Satisfaction of a Temporal Specification at Run-Time

A responsive computing system is a hybrid of real-time, distributed and fault-tolerant systems. In such a system, severe consequences can occur if the run-time behavior does not conform to the expected behavior or specifications. In this paper, we present a formal approach to ensure satisfaction of the specifications in the operational environment as follows. First we specify behavior of the systems using Interval Temporal Logic (ITL). Next we give algorithms for trace checking of programs in such systems. Finally, we present a fully distributed run-time evaluation system which causally orders the events of the system during its execution and checks this run-time behavior against its ITL specification. The approach is illustrated using a train-set example

Temporalized logics and automata for time granularity

Suitable extensions of the monadic second-order theory of k successors have been proposed in the literature to capture the notion of time granularity. In this paper, we provide the monadic second-order theories of downward unbounded layered structures, which are infinitely refinable structures consisting of a coarsest domain and an infinite number of finer and finer domains, and of upward unbounded layered structures, which consist of a finest domain and an infinite number of coarser and coarser domains, with expressively complete and elementarily decidable temporal logic counterparts. We obtain such a result in two steps. First, we define a new class of combined automata, called temporalized automata, which can be proved to be the automata-theoretic counterpart of temporalized logics, and show that relevant properties, such as closure under Boolean operations, decidability, and expressive equivalence with respect to temporal logics, transfer from component automata to temporalized ones. Then, we exploit the correspondence between temporalized logics and automata to reduce the task of finding the temporal logic counterparts of the given theories of time granularity to the easier one of finding temporalized automata counterparts of them.Comment: Journal: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Journal Acronym: TPLP Category: Paper for Special Issue (Verification and Computational Logic) Submitted: 18 March 2002, revised: 14 Januari 2003, accepted: 5 September 200