13,481 research outputs found

    A no-reference optical flow-based quality evaluator for stereoscopic videos in curvelet domain

    Get PDF
    Most of the existing 3D video quality assessment (3D-VQA/SVQA) methods only consider spatial information by directly using an image quality evaluation method. In addition, a few take the motion information of adjacent frames into consideration. In practice, one may assume that a single data-view is unlikely to be sufficient for effectively learning the video quality. Therefore, integration of multi-view information is both valuable and necessary. In this paper, we propose an effective multi-view feature learning metric for blind stereoscopic video quality assessment (BSVQA), which jointly focuses on spatial information, temporal information and inter-frame spatio-temporal information. In our study, a set of local binary patterns (LBP) statistical features extracted from a computed frame curvelet representation are used as spatial and spatio-temporal description, and the local flow statistical features based on the estimation of optical flow are used to describe the temporal distortion. Subsequently, a support vector regression (SVR) is utilized to map the feature vectors of each single view to subjective quality scores. Finally, the scores of multiple views are pooled into the final score according to their contribution rate. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed metric significantly outperforms the existing metrics and can achieve higher consistency with subjective quality assessment

    Comparing apples and oranges: assessment of the relative video quality in the presence of different types of distortions

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Video quality assessment is essential for the performance analysis of visual communication applications. Objective metrics can be used for estimating the relative quality differences, but they typically give reliable results only if the compared videos contain similar types of quality distortion. However, video compression typically produces different kinds of visual artifacts than transmission errors. In this article, we focus on a novel subjective quality assessment method that is suitable for comparing different types of quality distortions. The proposed method has been used to evaluate how well different objective quality metrics estimate the relative subjective quality levels for content with different types of quality distortions. Our conclusion is that none of the studied objective metrics works reliably for assessing the co-impact of compression artifacts and transmission errors on the subjective quality. Nevertheless, we have observed that the objective metrics' tendency to either over- or underestimate the perceived impact of transmission errors has a high correlation with the spatial and temporal activity levels of the content. Therefore, our results can be useful for improving the performance of objective metrics in the presence of both source and channel distortions.</p
    • …
    corecore