494 research outputs found
Spanners for Geometric Intersection Graphs
Efficient algorithms are presented for constructing spanners in geometric
intersection graphs. For a unit ball graph in R^k, a (1+\epsilon)-spanner is
obtained using efficient partitioning of the space into hypercubes and solving
bichromatic closest pair problems. The spanner construction has almost
equivalent complexity to the construction of Euclidean minimum spanning trees.
The results are extended to arbitrary ball graphs with a sub-quadratic running
time.
For unit ball graphs, the spanners have a small separator decomposition which
can be used to obtain efficient algorithms for approximating proximity problems
like diameter and distance queries. The results on compressed quadtrees,
geometric graph separators, and diameter approximation might be of independent
interest.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figures, Late
On a family of strong geometric spanners that admit local routing strategies
We introduce a family of directed geometric graphs, denoted \paz, that
depend on two parameters and . For and , the \paz graph is a strong
-spanner, with . The out-degree of a node
in the \paz graph is at most . Moreover, we show that routing can be
achieved locally on \paz. Next, we show that all strong -spanners are also
-spanners of the unit disk graph. Simulations for various values of the
parameters and indicate that for random point sets, the
spanning ratio of \paz is better than the proven theoretical bounds
The Price of Order
We present tight bounds on the spanning ratio of a large family of ordered
-graphs. A -graph partitions the plane around each vertex into
disjoint cones, each having aperture . An ordered
-graph is constructed by inserting the vertices one by one and
connecting each vertex to the closest previously-inserted vertex in each cone.
We show that for any integer , ordered -graphs with
cones have a tight spanning ratio of . We also show that for any integer , ordered
-graphs with cones have a tight spanning ratio of . We provide lower bounds for ordered -graphs with and cones. For ordered -graphs with and
cones these lower bounds are strictly greater than the worst case spanning
ratios of their unordered counterparts. These are the first results showing
that ordered -graphs have worse spanning ratios than unordered
-graphs. Finally, we show that, unlike their unordered counterparts,
the ordered -graphs with 4, 5, and 6 cones are not spanners
- …