1,509 research outputs found

    Uncountable realtime probabilistic classes

    Full text link
    We investigate the minimum cases for realtime probabilistic machines that can define uncountably many languages with bounded error. We show that logarithmic space is enough for realtime PTMs on unary languages. On binary case, we follow the same result for double logarithmic space, which is tight. When replacing the worktape with some limited memories, we can follow uncountable results on unary languages for two counters.Comment: 12 pages. Accepted to DCFS201

    Quantum computation with devices whose contents are never read

    Full text link
    In classical computation, a "write-only memory" (WOM) is little more than an oxymoron, and the addition of WOM to a (deterministic or probabilistic) classical computer brings no advantage. We prove that quantum computers that are augmented with WOM can solve problems that neither a classical computer with WOM nor a quantum computer without WOM can solve, when all other resource bounds are equal. We focus on realtime quantum finite automata, and examine the increase in their power effected by the addition of WOMs with different access modes and capacities. Some problems that are unsolvable by two-way probabilistic Turing machines using sublogarithmic amounts of read/write memory are shown to be solvable by these enhanced automata.Comment: 32 pages, a preliminary version of this work was presented in the 9th International Conference on Unconventional Computation (UC2010

    Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing

    Full text link
    Recently a great deal of attention has focused on quantum computation following a sequence of results suggesting that quantum computers are more powerful than classical probabilistic computers. Following Shor's result that factoring and the extraction of discrete logarithms are both solvable in quantum polynomial time, it is natural to ask whether all of NP can be efficiently solved in quantum polynomial time. In this paper, we address this question by proving that relative to an oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class NP cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time o(2n/2)o(2^{n/2}). We also show that relative to a permutation oracle chosen uniformly at random, with probability 1, the class NPcoNPNP \cap coNP cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine in time o(2n/3)o(2^{n/3}). The former bound is tight since recent work of Grover shows how to accept the class NP relative to any oracle on a quantum computer in time O(2n/2)O(2^{n/2}).Comment: 18 pages, latex, no figures, to appear in SIAM Journal on Computing (special issue on quantum computing
    corecore