9,293 research outputs found

    Note on the upper bound of the rainbow index of a graph

    Full text link
    A path in an edge-colored graph GG, where adjacent edges may be colored the same, is a rainbow path if every two edges of it receive distinct colors. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph GG, denoted by rc(G)rc(G), is the minimum number of colors that are needed to color the edges of GG such that there exists a rainbow path connecting every two vertices of GG. Similarly, a tree in GG is a rainbow~tree if no two edges of it receive the same color. The minimum number of colors that are needed in an edge-coloring of GG such that there is a rainbow tree connecting SS for each kk-subset SS of V(G)V(G) is called the kk-rainbow index of GG, denoted by rxk(G)rx_k(G), where kk is an integer such that 2kn2\leq k\leq n. Chakraborty et al. got the following result: For every ϵ>0\epsilon> 0, a connected graph with minimum degree at least ϵn\epsilon n has bounded rainbow connection, where the bound depends only on ϵ\epsilon. Krivelevich and Yuster proved that if GG has nn vertices and the minimum degree δ(G)\delta(G) then rc(G)<20n/δ(G)rc(G)<20n/\delta(G). This bound was later improved to 3n/(δ(G)+1)+33n/(\delta(G)+1)+3 by Chandran et al. Since rc(G)=rx2(G)rc(G)=rx_2(G), a natural problem arises: for a general kk determining the true behavior of rxk(G)rx_k(G) as a function of the minimum degree δ(G)\delta(G). In this paper, we give upper bounds of rxk(G)rx_k(G) in terms of the minimum degree δ(G)\delta(G) in different ways, namely, via Szemer\'{e}di's Regularity Lemma, connected 22-step dominating sets, connected (k1)(k-1)-dominating sets and kk-dominating sets of GG.Comment: 12 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0902.1255 by other author

    Distributed Connectivity Decomposition

    Full text link
    We present time-efficient distributed algorithms for decomposing graphs with large edge or vertex connectivity into multiple spanning or dominating trees, respectively. As their primary applications, these decompositions allow us to achieve information flow with size close to the connectivity by parallelizing it along the trees. More specifically, our distributed decomposition algorithms are as follows: (I) A decomposition of each undirected graph with vertex-connectivity kk into (fractionally) vertex-disjoint weighted dominating trees with total weight Ω(klogn)\Omega(\frac{k}{\log n}), in O~(D+n)\widetilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n}) rounds. (II) A decomposition of each undirected graph with edge-connectivity λ\lambda into (fractionally) edge-disjoint weighted spanning trees with total weight λ12(1ε)\lceil\frac{\lambda-1}{2}\rceil(1-\varepsilon), in O~(D+nλ)\widetilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n\lambda}) rounds. We also show round complexity lower bounds of Ω~(D+nk)\tilde{\Omega}(D+\sqrt{\frac{n}{k}}) and Ω~(D+nλ)\tilde{\Omega}(D+\sqrt{\frac{n}{\lambda}}) for the above two decompositions, using techniques of [Das Sarma et al., STOC'11]. Moreover, our vertex-connectivity decomposition extends to centralized algorithms and improves the time complexity of [Censor-Hillel et al., SODA'14] from O(n3)O(n^3) to near-optimal O~(m)\tilde{O}(m). As corollaries, we also get distributed oblivious routing broadcast with O(1)O(1)-competitive edge-congestion and O(logn)O(\log n)-competitive vertex-congestion. Furthermore, the vertex connectivity decomposition leads to near-time-optimal O(logn)O(\log n)-approximation of vertex connectivity: centralized O~(m)\widetilde{O}(m) and distributed O~(D+n)\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n}). The former moves toward the 1974 conjecture of Aho, Hopcroft, and Ullman postulating an O(m)O(m) centralized exact algorithm while the latter is the first distributed vertex connectivity approximation

    Disjoint Dominating Sets with a Perfect Matching

    Full text link
    In this paper, we consider dominating sets DD and DD' such that DD and DD' are disjoint and there exists a perfect matching between them. Let DDm(G)DD_{\textrm{m}}(G) denote the cardinality of smallest such sets D,DD, D' in GG (provided they exist, otherwise DDm(G)=DD_{\textrm{m}}(G) = \infty). This concept was introduced in [Klostermeyer et al., Theory and Application of Graphs, 2017] in the context of studying a certain graph protection problem. We characterize the trees TT for which DDm(T)DD_{\textrm{m}}(T) equals a certain graph protection parameter and for which DDm(T)=α(T)DD_{\textrm{m}}(T) = \alpha(T), where α(G)\alpha(G) is the independence number of GG. We also further study this parameter in graph products, e.g., by giving bounds for grid graphs, and in graphs of small independence number

    Proof of a tournament partition conjecture and an application to 1-factors with prescribed cycle lengths

    Get PDF
    In 1982 Thomassen asked whether there exists an integer f(k,t) such that every strongly f(k,t)-connected tournament T admits a partition of its vertex set into t vertex classes V_1,...,V_t such that for all i the subtournament T[V_i] induced on T by V_i is strongly k-connected. Our main result implies an affirmative answer to this question. In particular we show that f(k,t) = O(k^7 t^4) suffices. As another application of our main result we give an affirmative answer to a question of Song as to whether, for any integer t, there exists an integer h(t) such that every strongly h(t)-connected tournament has a 1-factor consisting of t vertex-disjoint cycles of prescribed lengths. We show that h(t) = O(t^5) suffices.Comment: final version, to appear in Combinatoric
    corecore