27 research outputs found

    Golden gaskets: variations on the Sierpi\'nski sieve

    Full text link
    We consider the iterated function systems (IFSs) that consist of three general similitudes in the plane with centres at three non-collinear points, and with a common contraction factor \la\in(0,1). As is well known, for \la=1/2 the invariant set, \S_\la, is a fractal called the Sierpi\'nski sieve, and for \la<1/2 it is also a fractal. Our goal is to study \S_\la for this IFS for 1/2<\la<2/3, i.e., when there are "overlaps" in \S_\la as well as "holes". In this introductory paper we show that despite the overlaps (i.e., the Open Set Condition breaking down completely), the attractor can still be a totally self-similar fractal, although this happens only for a very special family of algebraic \la's (so-called "multinacci numbers"). We evaluate \dim_H(\S_\la) for these special values by showing that \S_\la is essentially the attractor for an infinite IFS which does satisfy the Open Set Condition. We also show that the set of points in the attractor with a unique ``address'' is self-similar, and compute its dimension. For ``non-multinacci'' values of \la we show that if \la is close to 2/3, then \S_\la has a nonempty interior and that if \la<1/\sqrt{3} then \S_\la$ has zero Lebesgue measure. Finally we discuss higher-dimensional analogues of the model in question.Comment: 27 pages, 10 figure

    Dynamical degrees of birational transformations of projective surfaces

    Get PDF
    The dynamical degree λ(f)\lambda(f) of a birational transformation ff measures the exponential growth rate of the degree of the formulae that define the nn-th iterate of ff. We study the set of all dynamical degrees of all birational transformations of projective surfaces, and the relationship between the value of λ(f)\lambda(f) and the structure of the conjugacy class of ff. For instance, the set of all dynamical degrees of birational transformations of the complex projective plane is a closed and well ordered set of algebraic numbers.Comment: 65 page

    Multifractal analysis of Bernoulli convolutions associated with Salem numbers

    Get PDF
    We consider the multifractal structure of the Bernoulli convolution νλ\nu_{\lambda}, where λ1\lambda^{-1} is a Salem number in (1,2)(1,2). Let τ(q)\tau(q) denote the LqL^q spectrum of νλ\nu_\lambda. We show that if α[τ(+),τ(0+)]\alpha \in [\tau'(+\infty), \tau'(0+)], then the level set E(α):=xR:  limr0logνλ([xr,x+r])logr=αE(\alpha):={x\in \R:\; \lim_{r\to 0}\frac{\log \nu_\lambda([x-r, x+r])}{\log r}=\alpha} is non-empty and dimHE(α)=τ(α)\dim_HE(\alpha)=\tau^*(\alpha), where τ\tau^* denotes the Legendre transform of τ\tau. This result extends to all self-conformal measures satisfying the asymptotically weak separation condition. We point out that the interval [τ(+),τ(0+)][\tau'(+\infty), \tau'(0+)] is not a singleton when λ1\lambda^{-1} is the largest real root of the polynomial xnxn1...x+1x^{n}-x^{n-1}-... -x+1, n4n\geq 4. An example is constructed to show that absolutely continuous self-similar measures may also have rich multifractal structures.Comment: 26 pages. Accepted by Adv. Mat

    A classification of all 1-Salem graphs

    Get PDF
    Abstract. One way to study certain classes of polynomials is by considering examples that are attached to combinatorial objects. Any graph G has an asso-ciated reciprocal polynomial RG, and with two particular classes of reciprocal polynomials in mind one can ask the questions: (a) when is RG a product of cy-clotomic polynomials (giving the cyclotomic graphs)? (b) when does RG have the minimal polynomial of a Salem number as its only non-cyclotomic factor (the non-trival Salem graphs)? Cyclotomic graphs were classified by Smith in 1970; the maximal connected ones are known as Smith graphs. Salem graphs are ‘spectrally close ’ to being cyclotomic, in that nearly all their eigenvalues are in the critical interval [−2, 2]. On the other hand Salem graphs do not need to be ‘combinatorially close ’ to being cyclotomic: the largest cyclotomic induced subgraph might be comparatively tiny. We define an m-Salem graph to be a connected Salem graph G for which m is minimal such that there exists an induced cyclotomic subgraph of G that has m fewer vertices than G. The 1-Salem subgraphs are both spectrally close and combinatorially close to being cyclotomic. Moreover, every Salem graph contains a 1-Salem graph as an induced subgraph, so these 1-Salem graphs provide some necessary substructure of all Salem graphs. The main result of this paper is a complete combinatorial description of all 1-Salem graphs: in the non-bipartite case there are 25 infinite families and 383 sporadic examples
    corecore